Bleach Clean
Registered User
- Aug 9, 2006
- 27,063
- 6,639
I think Wood will be gone by 11 as at least one team will prioritize size and take him over the smaller forwards like Moore, Perreault, Yager, etc. He could very well be that guy who will be considered a top 5 player in their draft when all is said and done but this draft is loaded with high upside forwards and will take years to sort out who the best ones are.
We obviously like to project the best outcomes for every pick (especially those we favour), but where it gets wonky is that we project a top offensive outcome for 'rounded' talents while at the same time giving those same players a high floor edge. Example: Wood could be top5 producer/player or 'fail' on his way to middle6 utility.
While this may be the case, it is unlikely to be the case. The players around Wood are more talented and smarter (Benson/Perreault). If we say that Wood is likely to hit his ceiling and become Thompson, then we have to say Benson becomes Point. Ordinarily, we would give the better skilled player a higher chance to hit his offensive ceiling, but here Wood is the best of both (he's not).
It would be different if Wood was seen as a Tkachuk level producer and talent, given his draft class comparable players. Tkachuk compared favourably to Keller in terms of skill and IQ. Wood's context is more Pettersson/Vilardi, where there is a clear trade off between production and versatility amongst his peers.
As an aside, Keller's production in his first year (his only year, similar to Wood) at Boston was stellar. NHLe was 46.77. NHLe for Tkachuk was 49.71 in London.
Last edited: