LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
For every Chicago there’s multiple teams like the Flyers & Canucks that absolutely refuse to strip their teams down in spite of themselves.
Why is it that hockey is the only sport so afraid of tanking? Oh right. HockeyGuys
Even then, they only attached truly significant penalties to tanking when the Sixers did it.The NBA is really the only other sport that fans & media whine about tanking on a somewhat similar level as NHL fans & media.
A few years ago there was a like an unemployed dude in like the Midwest I think that somehow like hacked into his state’s lottery system with an iPad to produce the number on his ticket.
Unless it's the Knicks then it's fine.The NBA is really the only other sport that fans & media whine about tanking on a somewhat similar level as NHL fans & media.
For every Chicago there’s multiple teams like the Flyers & Canucks that absolutely refuse to strip their teams down in spite of themselves.
Same reason players don't like to tank and it can poison a team - I'm gonna destroy my future contract value so the team can draft a player who'll help them win after I'm long gone?Imagine being stupid enough to think that NHL players are going to go all-out in a tournament for a teenager that will take one of their jobs lol.
Same reason players don't like to tank and it can poison a team - I'm gonna destroy my future contract value so the team can draft a player who'll help them win after I'm long gone?
No thank you, I'm gonna try and make plays and win games and draft position be damned - because you're gonna trade my ass in any case. I want good film out there.
Yeah, if we want a stupid idea that's actually fun, and doesn't involve teams actively trying to either a) tank or b) have to win meaningless games in a tournament where their players won't care, we might as well implement Sean McIndoe's Partner Draft system. Just have each non-playoff team, in reverse points order, draft a playoff team to be their partner. Whoever drafts the eventual Cup winner gets #1, runner up's partner gets #2, then each round's losers are sorted: in his original version, by when each partner team is eliminated, exactly; my modification, which I think is cleaner, is in reverse points order amongst those teams. So, with the record-setting Bruins almost certainly the partner of the #32 Ducks, the Ducks would get the 9th pick, as the worst team whose partner was eliminated in the first round. Tanking just means you get to draft a more impressive team, but as we've already seen, that guarantees exactly nothing.Imagine being stupid enough to think that NHL players are going to go all-out in a tournament for a teenager that will take one of their jobs lol.
Benson is 5’9” and 160, yes, but..You all know in 1974 by the playoffs, Clarke maybe weighed 165. If Benson has half the moxie of Clarke and half the skill of Briere, I’m good. Clarke took the shortest route from A to B and Benson does also.
Yeah, if we want a stupid idea that's actually fun, and doesn't involve teams actively trying to either a) tank or b) have to win meaningless games in a tournament where their players won't care, we might as well implement Sean McIndoe's Partner Draft system. Just have each non-playoff team, in reverse points order, draft a playoff team to be their partner. Whoever drafts the eventual Cup winner gets #1, runner up's partner gets #2, then each round's losers are sorted: in his original version, by when each partner team is eliminated, exactly; my modification, which I think is cleaner, is in reverse points order amongst those teams. So, with the record-setting Bruins almost certainly the partner of the #32 Ducks, the Ducks would get the 9th pick, as the worst team whose partner was eliminated in the first round. Tanking just means you get to draft a more impressive team, but as we've already seen, that guarantees exactly nothing.
God I'd kill to have someone under 5"10 and diabetes on this squad.
That'll do it.
For every Chicago there’s multiple teams like the Flyers & Canucks that absolutely refuse to strip their teams down in spite of themselves.
He’s so, so good. When it’s hard to zero-in on a player’s flaws, ya know ya got a good player on your hands. This applies to Benson 100%. He attacks in a variety of hard to decipher/diagnose ways, processes the game at light speed, and forces the opposition into problematic situations. He’s my favorite player in this draft after Bedard and Fantilli.
This from Charlie O’Connor nearly made me spit out my morning coffee (from The Athletic’s beat writer Mock Draft: “Benson is the player available here who best fits the bill, even if his risk profile is a bit higher than some of the other available forwards.”
Benson is easily the least risky player that could be available at 7. Dvorsky would be the riskiest because he genuinely doesn’t have high-end skills.
For every Chicago there’s multiple teams like the Flyers & Canucks that absolutely refuse to strip their teams down in spite of themselves.
As I said, I like Benson.Benson is 5’9” and 160, yes, but..You all know in 1974 by the playoffs, Clarke maybe weighed 165. If Benson has half the moxie of Clarke and half the skill of Briere, I’m good. Clarke took the shortest route from A to B and Benson does also.
It may stop GMs from actively tanking, but what reasons do players have to spend weeks playing for a draft pick after a long frustrating season?I've floated this idea many times... as a fan, I would have a reason to watch my non-playoff team fight for 1st overall.
I dunno, I see it as a win for the fanbases, win for the league (more revenue), and win for the teams (actively keeping good players and fighting other bottom 8 teams for 1st overall).
Sure beats the hell out of whatever it is they're doing now.
Thanks. Always appreciate reading these detailed takes on these guys.You know this, but O'Connor doesn't watch prospects and is generally bad with young talent in general. I had a hunch who he was parroting in his go-to scouting source, Pronman. Sure enough, here's Pronman from March (had Benson 13): "His frame, combined with a lack of separation speed, is a concern, though, for his NHL projection even though he’s got good quickness in tight. There is a fair amount of risk on his projection, but his strong compete and tremendous skill plus track record of scoring, makes you think there is still a very good chance he can become a quality top-six wing in the NHL." I had to scroll past Danielson, But, Barlow, Yager to get to him.
There's no risk to his game; that's a load of crap. Also my favorite watch after the top 2 -- there's a more-than-the-sum, it factor there. Truly, a do-it-all player that just makes me smile because he chains so much good shit together on the regular. A 5'9 winger shouldn't be the best defensive player and puck battler/forechecker and offensive player on the ice every f***ing shift.......and yet.
His passing isn't as flashy as Smith, but I don't think his touch or effectiveness as a playmaker is any less. Does he have a pure separation gear? It's more fine than great (it's better than some others in his range), but that feels like missing the forest for the trees. He's got a great low stride to build from, and I've never seen him caught or angled off. He just disguises his gear changes and top end very well, finding a bit more any time someone closes, along with a lot of patience with guys on his hip or defenders in front. And his footwork/edge work is fantastic in tight, going heel-to-heel, darting in and out of traffic, curling on entries, whatever. He finds a way to be a great exit/entry generator.