In all honesty do we actually think we will recoup anymore picks tomorrow?
In all honesty do we actually think we will recoup anymore picks tomorrow?
I would be shocked if we get something in rounds 2-4.
Also whoever we choose tomorrow(if we even make a pick) will be the steal of the draft.
I don't really know the specifics past he leaked video of a woman performing a sexual act on him, but I feel from a moral standpoint Mitch Miller's situation is much worse. You can make an argument based on what the climate is though.
Guaranteed whoever we pick with #41 will be followed-up with a quote of “we had him ranked in the first round.”
I could also see them slide back from #41 and pick up another pick. Maybe slide back a second time, too. This draft is so underscouted and volatile that there may yet be hidden quality in the later rounds. Pick volume might be the better call than pick position from here on out.
I mean, there's a chance he did change as a result of this. Or at least started the transformation.This guy is 18. He's an adult. And it just happened. There is no path for redemption that has been travelled. He hasn't changed. He's still the same shit person that he was when he did this a couple months ago. By selecting him, Montreal is endorsing the person he is in the here and now, and that's revolting. This is what makes it worse to me.
Over the last eight years, you'd need a forensic accountant to figure out how many picks have been flushed.Can anyone summarize all the picks that Benning have traded away?
I mean, there's a chance he did change as a result of this. Or at least started the transformation.
I always believe people can change and better themselves. But yes, I have no idea if any of that has happened here. The all-too-common frat bro culture you see here that got Mailloux into big trouble is just nuclear toxicity, and you can never tell how serious these young men are with their "reform". Or are the just saying the right things to get out of trouble? Because a true betterment requires a completely different mindset, attitude and way of thinking which is never easy to do especially at that age/stature (18 year old hot shot prospect).
There's no easy answer to this. I guess what you can hope is the NHL team can support and help him now.
Can anyone summarize all the picks that Benning have traded away?
As we currently stand only actually making picks including next year - so 9 draftpick allotments
We are:
Minus 1 - first round
Minus 3 - second round
Minus 3 - third round
Minus 4 - fourth round
Plus 2 - fifth round
Plus 3 - sixth round
Plus 2 - seventh round
1st and 3rd for miller
1st, 2nd, 7th for ekman larsson and garland
2nd for vey
2nd for baertschi
2nd and 4th (forgot mccann) for gudbranson and 5th
2nd and Bonino for sutter and 3rd
2nd and madden for toffoli
3rd for pedan
3rd for dickinson
3rd for dorsett
4th for bowey and 5th
4th and pedan for pouliot
5th for larsen
5th and kassian for prust
6th and jensen for etem
Dont recall any others
I'll drop this conversation, I'm not really educated enough to quantify the differences of the two cases and two schmoes discussing it on the internet seems trite when the reality is both situations are unacceptable. I will say this is hella bad PR for the Canadiens.
It would just be your second incorrect statement... If you instead said that they are both highly talented and KJ has more issues he has to work on outside of that base, that would be accurate.
Oh, and it’s likely that Eklund is the better overall player, while Johnson has the higher ceiling. In other words, Eklund is the safer pick. (I believe I said I had both in my top9 yesterday)
You are really grasping at straws. I am not a fan of KJ, I dont know what else to tell you, also not sure how my "opinion" is an incorrect statement because I think william eklund is highly talented and I dont feel the same way about KJ. You clearly disagree. Time to let this go. And I dont agree johnson has the higher ceiling then eklund, we simply disagree.
Nobody is right or wrong at the moment, nobody is making incorrect statements having an opinion. Lets see how this pans out.
No, you're wrong at exactly this moment. Right now. I don't care a bit that you dislike Johnson. That doesn't matter. But to say he's not highly talented... Like what are you even watching? That opinion in of itself is absurd.
How is Johnson even highly touted, with all the warts in his game, if he's not talented? What else does he bring? A 2way game? It's because he's talented that he's rated in the top10 at all. That's the one attribute that he does have.
And sure, we can disagree that Johnson has the higher ceiling. I'm fine with that, but to say he's not highly talented... Wow. Understand what you're saying. We're not arguing who is better, we're relaying our perception of/the presence of talent in these players.
Lol @ Montreal and Edmonton.... talk about absolutely dropping the ball. Edmonton had Wallstedt fall to their lap and they somehow trade back for an extra 3rd rounder?? Brutal.