can anyone with better math skills than me parse the comments from mckenzie link quoted below as a math problem? they seem to suggest there must be near unanimous consensus among his scouts on the top 8 but differences on order. there is almost no way hughes could be 8th with votes as described unless everyone ranked higher than him was ranked in the top 8 by nearly every scout. it suggests johnson is in a different tier with only a very few votes above 9 and some votes higher than 9.
"There’s not much at all separating Beniers, Edvinsson, Eklund, McTavish and Guenther. Any one of them may be worthy of No. 2 honours depending upon the preference of the individual teams ranking them.
And here’s where it gets even more interesting and/or confusing. While no other prospect than the five listed above got a vote at No. 2, the Nos. 7, 8 and 9 players on the TSN list also received notable support as top 3 to 5 picks."
"University of Michigan recruit Luke Hughes, who played this season for the U.S. Under-18 program, is No. 8 on our list but he also received multiple Top 5 votes and none lower than No. 9."