The Zetterberg Era
Ball Hockey Sucks
Edvinsson is a very good defensive player, so you're looking at a solid second pairing floor in my opinion. I have been kind of all over the map on him at times this year, he started as my #2. He does things at times offensively that I just don't really care for, but is it something you believe you can develop out of him? The tools on Edvinsson are pretty out of this world and in a lot of ways you could have a big hammer pairing there where you free up Seider to play more offensively and play more engaged physically. That has best pairing in the league potential, or when (let's be hopeful on this one) we get Werenski you have your ability to split a big three in leverage ways. I think this draft might tip our hand on what we believe on Werenski because we are only a couple years away from that being a reality. It might be why the defensive depth articles are starting to run in the Detroit press and those around the team are pushing they like the forwards in this draft too.
But I would be pretty ecstatic to land a talent of Edvinsson's abilities. It is hard to get away from how good the tools are here, it is on your team to develop that and we are eventually going to need to start winning on these, like we have with Seider thus far. That is how you get a lot better. I have him at #4 and a lot of that is on potential, but I believe defensively this guy is very good and has good instincts, what he becomes offensively is up to simplifying his game and getting better shooting selection. I don't think any of his flaws are fatal and I believe in the package of the player athletically that if Hakan says yes I will be very excited. He is kind of an upgraded Wallinder and I had him top 15 last year and we did like him. I hope if he slides we really consider it.
But I would be pretty ecstatic to land a talent of Edvinsson's abilities. It is hard to get away from how good the tools are here, it is on your team to develop that and we are eventually going to need to start winning on these, like we have with Seider thus far. That is how you get a lot better. I have him at #4 and a lot of that is on potential, but I believe defensively this guy is very good and has good instincts, what he becomes offensively is up to simplifying his game and getting better shooting selection. I don't think any of his flaws are fatal and I believe in the package of the player athletically that if Hakan says yes I will be very excited. He is kind of an upgraded Wallinder and I had him top 15 last year and we did like him. I hope if he slides we really consider it.