dracom
Registered User
that's one thing I can agree with Eakins on, diving shouldn't be in the league.
we aren't getting calls anyway, we get less calls than any other team. refs have no interest in giving us calls so might as well establish some moral high ground.No-diving would be great but it's totally aspirational. Refs still commonly make tripping calls on dives. While this is ethical messaging on Eakins' part, the fact is it will probably lead to the Ducks not getting calls if they aren't diving.
I'd prefer if the league banned diving and suspended players who dive and do post game video review of diving like they do with illegal hits to the head.No-diving would be great but it's totally aspirational. Refs still commonly make tripping calls on dives. While this is ethical messaging on Eakins' part, the fact is it will probably lead to the Ducks not getting calls if they aren't diving.
I checked this awhile back and I think I found that in the last 20 years we've been bottom 10 in net penalty calls all but 4 of those, and we're usually bottom 3. Good team, bad team, different coaches, totally different roster, same result.we aren't getting calls anyway, we get less calls than any other team. refs have no interest in giving us calls so might as well establish some moral high ground.
Captain Getzlaf is part of the reason for that. The Ducks under captain Niedermayer in 2006-07 were able to draw more penalties than the Ducks were penalized.I checked this awhile back and I think I found that in the last 20 years we've been bottom 10 in net penalty calls all but 4 of those, and we're usually bottom 3. Good team, bad team, different coaches, totally different roster, same result.
My reason for wanting to see Mahura over Larsson is only because i want a different player to complain about lol.Mahura Shattenkirk would be in contention for worst DEFENSIVE pairing in Ducks history. I am serious too, Mahura would be getting pushed around/on the ice half the time and Shattenkirk would be puck watching with a finger up his butt.
If Mahura is playing you better put him with Manson.....
Right, they definitely aren't always easy calls to make. I think Eakins is intimating no diving under any circumstances and if we're talking about the first scenario you mentioned, we probably would lose out over the course of a season. the 2nd type you could argue you risk getting an embellishing call as well. Basically i kinda agree with him in an aspirational sense but maybe not in practice?I'd prefer if the league banned diving and suspended players who dive and do post game video review of diving like they do with illegal hits to the head.
The refs probably think that less penalties are commited against the Ducks because from their point of view they are less likely to notice as many because the Ducks are 0% diving.
Either the league bans diving altogether or the Ducks are missing out in an increase in PP time that could help players like Zegras break out.
Maybe there is 2 types of diving. One where there really is a penalty but the player dives so that the refs have an easier time spotting it because refs eyes can't be everywhere perfectly. The other being where a player dives when a penalty wasn't commited and thats the kind of diving i hate the most.
I wouldn’t be optimistic about that. Nashville historically has had a bunch of known divers on their team, and although I didn’t look it up, I’d bet they are top 10 in penalties drawn almost every season over the last 5-6 years. Colorado probably is starting to fall under that category now. Most of their skill guys are a bunch of embellishers.When you’re known in the league as a team that won’t tolerate your guys diving . That bodes well for not being picked on by refs anymore . Also when we do get hooked, we will get those calls more.
Steel over Milano? God, please no.I do not expect to see this but this is what I’d like:
Comtois-Zegras-Terry
Jones-Getzlaf-Rakell
Steel-Rico-Silfverberg
Grant-Lundy-Volkov
Steel over Milano? God, please no.
I'm so confused, so will the Bally Sports games NOT be available on ESPN+? It says we have 8 games that will be available nationally on ESPN, ESPN+, and Hulu. That makes no sense considering you're supposed to get over 1000 out of market games or whatever they said.
Plenty of ways to watch......I'm so confused, so will the Bally Sports games NOT be available on ESPN+? It says we have 8 games that will be available nationally on ESPN, ESPN+, and Hulu. That makes no sense considering you're supposed to get over 1000 out of market games or whatever they said.
I'm so confused, so will the Bally Sports games NOT be available on ESPN+? It says we have 8 games that will be available nationally on ESPN, ESPN+, and Hulu. That makes no sense considering you're supposed to get over 1000 out of market games or whatever they said.
I'm so confused, so will the Bally Sports games NOT be available on ESPN+? It says we have 8 games that will be available nationally on ESPN, ESPN+, and Hulu. That makes no sense considering you're supposed to get over 1000 out of market games or whatever they said.