Doesn't mean Byfield is a bad player or anything. Also keep in mind he's about a full year younger than Laf.
The last three drafts have not been good for the Number 1 overall. 2017 numbers 3, 4, 5 are better players than the top 2 picks. 2018 numbers 2, 4 ,7 are equal if not better than #1. 2019 looks to be a lost year for the draft. Lafreniere could be a Turgeon type player but he could also be a Daigle. If the Coyotes get the #1 pick you could always trade it along with other players to get cap relief and good quality pros but I do not trust Chayka to make that deal.
Every year the draft is a crap shoot, but less of a risk if you are picking #1. There is no way Chayka should trade this pick if we are so lucky to get it.The last three drafts have not been good for the Number 1 overall. 2017 numbers 3, 4, 5 are better players than the top 2 picks. 2018 numbers 2, 4 ,7 are equal if not better than #1. 2019 looks to be a lost year for the draft. Lafreniere could be a Turgeon type player but he could also be a Daigle. If the Coyotes get the #1 pick you could always trade it along with other players to get cap relief and good quality pros but I do not trust Chayka to make that deal.
If after winning the 1st overall (FINALLY!) if the Coyotes do anything other than simply draft Alexis Lafrenière with that pick, it will easily be the stupidest thing the Coyotes have ever done, in their 25 years of stupidity. It would be the absolute shit cherry on top of a complete shit sundae.Every year the draft is a crap shoot, but less of a risk if you are picking #1. There is no way Chayka should trade this pick if we are so lucky to get it.
Would you deal 1OV for 3OV and 5OV? We’d likely have to include 41OV as well or possibly a contract like Grabner or Goligoski and maybe Hinostroza. Create cap room to sign Hall....If after winning the 1st overall (FINALLY!) if the Coyotes do anything other than simply draft Alexis Lafrenière with that pick, it will easily be the stupidest thing the Coyotes have ever done, in their 25 years of stupidity. It would be the absolute shit cherry on top of a complete shit sundae.
No. Raanta and Goligoski can easily be dealt independently. Same for Hinostroza. I would guess we could get a late 2nd for Raanta, a late 3rd or early 4th for Goligoski and a 6th for Hinostroza.Would you deal 1OV for 3OV and 5OV? We’d likely have to include 41OV as well or possibly a contract like Grabner or Goligoski and maybe Hinostroza. Create cap room to sign Hall....
1OV
Hinostroza
Raanta
Goligoski
for
3OV
5OV
Logan Brown
^Keller and Schmaltz on the third line?
If the Coyotes end up with 1st overall I could be tempted to trade down a pick or 2 but no way Ottawa deals 3rd AND 5th, right?
Winning Lafreniere and signing Hall likely means one of the perimeter type forwards has to be moved for a little more size and grit to balance the lineup. And the CAP is still a thing so some salary has to go.
Sens GM have a no comment to that question on 31 thoughts podcast.^Keller and Schmaltz on the third line?
If the Coyotes end up with 1st overall I could be tempted to trade down a pick or 2 but no way Ottawa deals 3rd AND 5th, right?
Winning Lafreniere and signing Hall likely means one of the perimeter type forwards has to be moved for a little more size and grit to balance the lineup. And the CAP is still a thing so some salary has to go.
No thanks.Thinking through possible scenarios here:
Highly unlikely that Hall re-signs if we lose in the QR, but I would maybe put a 2% chance on it happening where we lost a close series to Nashville in OT each game, type of scenario.
The remaining time, Hall does not re-sign. So if we lose a 1st round pick in 2021, regardless, maybe the idea of trading 1 for 3 and 5 is not bad. We basically get a half year of Hall for the prospects and a 3rd round pick, as I would consider the #3 or 5 pick to be a better pick than what we would give to NJ the next year.
We could sell Hall on either Lafreniere or adding two very good players. Stutzle and Holtz could be our adds.
Just adding to an interesting discussion, but by winning #1 and losing the 2021 1st round pick, if we are certain Hall is not re-signing, maybe we look in that direction and use #1 to fill the loss of Hall and add another player as well by trading back.
All comes down to me on Hall resigning. If yes I’d seriously consider it.No. Raanta and Goligoski can easily be dealt independently. Same for Hinostroza. I would guess we could get a late 2nd for Raanta, a late 3rd or early 4th for Goligoski and a 6th for Hinostroza.
I would NOT trade 1st overall, a late 2nd, a late 3rd, and a 6th for 3rd overall, 5th overall, Logan Brown and a bunch of cap-space.
No thanks. If you can re-sign Hall and have a shot at Lafrenière, the easiest decision is to make secondary trades.All comes down to me on Hall resigning. If yes I’d seriously consider it.
Would you deal 1OV for 3OV and 5OV? We’d likely have to include 41OV as well or possibly a contract like Grabner or Goligoski and maybe Hinostroza. Create cap room to sign Hall....
1OV
Hinostroza
Raanta
Goligoski
for
3OV
5OV
Logan Brown
Makes sense for them. They probably think with Kopitar and Doughty not going anywhere and their prospect pool maturing, they might get their window opened back up for a quick minute. Stutzle could probably play next year, and be an impact player the year after. It seems to me that Byfield is going to be a very long-term project.Sam constantino (31 thoughts) confident kings taking Stutzle.
As a Soo Greyhound fan, I love the skill and creativity of Morgan Frost, but he’s too high-risk to see any ice under Toccet.Yes I would trade it back for 3 and 5 but I wouldn't want to do all that other stuff with Ottawa. I'd then trade the cursed #3 for Philadelphia's 1st, Frost and Ratcliffe and draft Drysdale at #5. Adding a power forward like Ratcliffe could be huge for us. He's probably pretty close to NHL ready now and getting someone like that at a very early age with lots of years left to dominate would be awesome. Frost is a previous teammate of Hayton and could be a great addition to his line in addition to being a center/wing which is a quality Chayka seems to look for.
Chayka admitted on day two of the 2017 draft that they would have taken Ratcliffe at that spot, if they hadn’t made the deal to trade back with Philadelphia. We instead ended up with Westerlund (bust), Schnarr (traded) and Hoefenmayer (chose not to retain).Yes I would trade it back for 3 and 5 but I wouldn't want to do all that other stuff with Ottawa. I'd then trade the cursed #3 for Philadelphia's 1st, Frost and Ratcliffe and draft Drysdale at #5. Adding a power forward like Ratcliffe could be huge for us. He's probably pretty close to NHL ready now and getting someone like that at a very early age with lots of years left to dominate would be awesome. Frost is a previous teammate of Hayton and could be a great addition to his line in addition to being a center/wing which is a quality Chayka seems to look for.
Just interesting that we have a source saying it’s:Makes sense for them. They probably think with Kopitar and Doughty not going anywhere and their prospect pool maturing, they might get their window opened back up for a quick minute. Stutzle could probably play next year, and be an impact player the year after. It seems to me that Byfield is going to be a very long-term project.
Hadn’t seen the Perfetti thing RE Detroit. You have a link? I’d be curious to read that.Just interesting that we have a source saying it’s:
1) Lafrenniere
2) Stutzle
3)
4) Perfetti
5)
so that would mean for Sens they would be looking at Byfield and likely Drysdale or possibly Rossi.