Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,526
- 50,249
I think its a winner. My preference is 2 forwards 3 and 5 but this would work just fine
NHL Entry Draft 2020 NHL Draft Discussion - PART XII [We got 3-5]
- Thread starter Burrowsaurus
- Start date
- Status
I think its a winner. My preference is 2 forwards 3 and 5 but this would work just fine
Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,526
- 50,249
lol I doubt they base their selection solely on this list or anything resembling it. I doubt they read anything posted here to influence their choice.
Six Assets
Tim Stützle
DJB
Registered User
Very happy. Mostly due to the moving up with the Isles pick. With all those 2nd rounders we need to use some to move back up into the top 10 if possible.
aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 28,621
- 9,133
I hope they make a deal in the first rd for another pick & therefore they could take two forwards & two D. They have a lot of holes to fill & with so many assets & picks in the first three rds, they could fill a number of those holes with some legitimate prospects. I also think they should look to acquire another 1st rd pick for the 2021 draft.
BondraTime
Registered User
Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,526
- 50,249
DraftSim today
3. Stutzle C/LW
5. Rossi C
21. Jarvis RW
33. Gunler LW/RW
49. Grans RD
52. Jarventie LW
55. Weisblatt RW
64. Hunt LD
95. Robins C
152. Uens LD
158. Ottavainen RD
185. Kunz C
What would be really cool is if the NHL teams (other than Ottawa) used the draft list on DraftSim lol
3. Stutzle C/LW
5. Rossi C
21. Jarvis RW
33. Gunler LW/RW
49. Grans RD
52. Jarventie LW
55. Weisblatt RW
64. Hunt LD
95. Robins C
152. Uens LD
158. Ottavainen RD
185. Kunz C
What would be really cool is if the NHL teams (other than Ottawa) used the draft list on DraftSim lol
Just to chime in. I dont see the Quinn > rossi thing. I mean. Is there a single list out there anywhere that has Quinn ahead of rossi. That opinion may only exist here. Which is fair all lists are BS. But it definitely is a hot take.
FormentonTheFuture
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 7,761
- 3,732
Icelevel
During these difficult times...
- Sep 9, 2009
- 24,889
- 5,067
Icelevel
During these difficult times...
- Sep 9, 2009
- 24,889
- 5,067
aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 28,621
- 9,133
While there are a couple of sites I have seen that have him slightly ahead most have Rossi ahead. It could come down to personal preference, as you know Rossi is not my kind of player, but then neither was Pageau & he turned into a pretty good player for this team with the heart of a lion. I think if the Sens target Quinn it will mostly be to sell tickets with the hometown guy, but he also fills a need on RW.
Pageau sold a ton of tickets & had the largest contingent of fans of any Sens player that I can remember right out of the gate & he's the only one I can think of that had his own song. But let's also not sell Quinn short either, he's a pretty dynamic goal scorer in his own right & can & should be talked about in the 4 to 12 range.
Stutzle - Lundell - Quinn would be interesting with the first three picks.
Liver King
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2016
- 7,445
- 5,279
aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 28,621
- 9,133
Top six centre with top line potential depending on the team. Detroit for example could use a good #1 centre IMO & they could use a player like Lundell at centre with Zadina on his wing.
If Ottawa were to draft him I think he would challenge Norris & L. Brown for the top two centre spots. And I think these three would solidify the centre position for Ottawa & probably make White expendable.
More to gauge what it would take to make everyone happy.
Basically if we end up taking a D at 5, I think the consensus is you package something with the NYI pick to move up and take another high-end forward.
I think the initial response of drafting Sanderson will be negative, but fans would get over it if we ended up with someone like Quinn afterwards.
Six Assets
Tim Stützle
middle 6 centre. if he has top line potential, he wouldn't be ranked outside of the top 10.
Liver King
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2016
- 7,445
- 5,279
Being the best center on a team doesnt really make you a true number 1C in the league though. Like does Lundell have 70+ point potential?
aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 28,621
- 9,133
I have no idea, but that seems reachable for him but it could depend who he plays with. 70 pts in the NHL is a lot & how long it takes a prospect with that potential to reach that pinnacle is also unknown.
Outside of Byfield is there another centre in this draft that has that kind of potential? Most would probably say Rossi and/or Perfetti, but who knows if there skillset will translate in the NHL at the same level that they enjoyed in junior? I think Lundell is a safer pick & has the potential to be a very good centre in the NHL because of his size & skillset package especially if he has a player like Stutzle on his wing. How many pts that translate to is anybody's guess.
ReginKarlssonLehner
Let's Win It All
That’s our dream outcome from the 1st round. We could even pick Lundell to ensure we solidify our C position FOR GOOD. I think it’s no brainer for us to trade back into top 10 even if we overpay a bit. This is the draft to do it.
If he improves his skating a bit I bet he is for sure.
He is similar to Mikko Koivu.
aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 28,621
- 9,133
Of course, I also thought that Koteneimi was going to be a pretty good centre for Montreal, he's still young & I expect he will force his way onto the team at some point, but who really knows with young guys.
However, I also think that if L. Brown becomes the #1 centre on this team & Lundell, Norris & White are fighting it out for the next two spots, they could really improve the team as a whole & the centre position for a number of yrs. IMO they need another centreman with size & skill, they already have a number of good young forwards coming to compliment their centremen & top 3 lines.
Tkachuk - L. Brown - Batherson
Stutzle - Lundell - ???
Formenton - Norris - Pinto
Duclair - White - C. Brown
Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,526
- 50,249
aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 28,621
- 9,133
I placed those guys on the bottom line to indicate that Ottawa has some extra forwards who could fill the ranks of the top 3 lines. IMO if Stutzle is the guy they draft & they decide they still need centre help than they have the guys who can fill some forward roles to help a young centreman. Most likely I see Ottawa parting ways with those 3 guys at some future point & they are placeholders until better players force them out.
I think Ottawa has an opportunity in this draft to add two great forwards, but I also think that one of those guys needs to be a centre. I like Lundell over the two smaller centres (Rossi/Perfetti) because I think he is a safe pick who has the abilities to reach his potential & improve our team down the middle. I know that those two guys are both more dynamic players, but I see problems with them that Lundell might not have in the NHL & to me he is a more complete player knowing full well that both could prove me wrong.
bert
Registered User
Ctaig Button and Brock Otten have them neck and neck saying they are interchangeable. I went to over 20 games this year Quinn was more impressive overall. Higher upside in my opinion. Its funny that someone compared him to Hoffman, they play nothing alike. Stylistically he is way closer to Stone. He is on the first pk unit and took matchups against the other teams top players.
L'Aveuglette
つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
I would be upset if we picked Sanderson with our 5th, yes.
- Status
