Gecklund
Registered User
Simek I disagree because he’s looked good in like 90% of the games he’s played. Doesn’t really matter though because doubt that one will happen. I did forget to mention that the expansion eligible D would be a cap dump-ish player.Few things in here. I don't think Simek is worth near a 2nd rounder given his injury history, contract, and overall small sample size of NHL games. Would also keep Marleau if he is willing to stick around as the games played record likely means more this year than a 4th or 5th round lottery ticket.
I am not really interested in giving up a 2nd for Bennett. Don't need a 3C that can't score that is going to command $3 mil a year on his next deal. At some point you can't let draft position cause you to overpay for what a player is now. Bennett will be 25 next season with 6 seasons in the league. Not going to magically turn into a good NHLer imo.
As it relates to moving forward, you have to find a way to clear salary and acquire a young top 6 forward. I would be willing to entertain trade offers for basically anyone in the organization not named Mario Ferraro at this juncture. If you get a good offer for Meier, Hertl, etc. you make the move based on where we are right now and likely going to be unless we find a way to offload the contracts of guys like Vlasic, Jones, etc.
Bennett has never been given the chance. When he’s not with pylons, he’s looked good. He played a few games with Gaudreau/Monahan when Elias Lindholm was injured or out (don’t remember) and looked really good. It’s not draft stock, it’s giving a 2nd because he obviously has the skill and I could see him taking over as 2C when Couture/Hertl get traded.
Agreed for the most part on the last part. I’d add a few names into the untouchables (Merkley, Wiesblatt, Bordeleau, Leonard) everyone else can go for the right deal.