Am I the only one who would look long and hard at offering Pettersson in an Eichel trade?
Eichel is great, but does he play all 200 feet, like Petey does? I think Eichel might be better suited as a second fiddle instead of the lead. So, I’d want Eichel, but not at the expense of Petey.Am I the only one who would look long and hard at offering Pettersson in an Eichel trade?
No denying he's a talent and a half, but something about his demeanour and comments (about being on a losing team) rub me the wrong way tbh...Am I the only one who would look long and hard at offering Pettersson in an Eichel trade?
Not without some agreement that he wanted to come here and, obviously, what the other pieces are.
It's also interesting how that would continue to shift the team into one that is pretty entirely driven by American players (Miller, Schmidt, Hughes, Boeser, Sutter, Motte, Gaudette, Demko, and even the bit guys like Bailey and Chatfield. Myers, who is Canadian, was born in Texas).
I doubt any team is offering a one for one type trade for him.I mean, obviously you'd want to do your homework. And I wouldn't go much further than 1-for-1 given Buffalo's issues and his potential desire to leave. And of course, you'd first see if you could do the trade with quantity of lesser assets instead of quality.
But if it came down to it ... man. Eichel is absolutely f***ing elite. There wouldn't be more than 3 forwards I'd take over him for the next 5 years (McDavid, Matthews, MacKinnon).
No denying he's a talent and a half, but something about his demeanour and comments (about being on a losing team) rub me the wrong way tbh...
Not convinced he's a' team' guy.
IMO there’s zero chance a rebuilding team, like the ducks, would offer their two star prospects for Eichel. EIchel will go to a team coming out of their rebuild like the Rangers, who have enough young talent to give up two young pieces.I doubt any team is offering a one for one type trade for him.
If Anaheim offers Zegras and Drysdale as the main pieces, that's hard to top from Vancouver's POV. Ducks get a replacement for Getzlaf as their 1C. Buffalo gains a PMD to play the right side with Dahlin on the left. And Zegras is the winger they passed over to take Cozens the C because they couldn't count on Mittlestadt to become their 2C.
Buffalo, could also stipulate that they need to swap Okposo for Kesler in that deal and put Kesler on LTIR and save on cash paying only the insurance for Kesler.
I doubt a package of Horvat, Boeser would be what Buffalo would want given the runway they would have before these 2 above hit UFA and unlikely to extend with them unless they see them truly turn the corner.
Getting really young guys gives them a longer runway to fix things.
Buffalo has to the end of the 21-22 NHL calendar year to be able to trade Eichel anywhere before his NTC clause kicks in for what would be his 8th NHL season. That is their deadline if they need to move him.
What were the comments. Any different than Miller’s outward effort ?No denying he's a talent and a half, but something about his demeanour and comments (about being on a losing team) rub me the wrong way tbh...
Not convinced he's a' team' guy.
I don't know. Like I said, you'd really want to do your homework.
My impression of Eichel is that he's a very competitive guy who wants to win and is frustrated at being stuck in a sad-sack organization. Seems like he's trying to demand improvement and excellence from the people around him. But I'd be lying if I said that Buffalo was one of the teams I followed most closely so I'm not going to say that my take is absolutely correct.
I feel like Pettersson would have similar things to say about multiple years on a losing team, though. Strikes me as a bit of a similar personality.
Trying to figure out what a good fit would be for both sides of a trade in terms of who could pull this deal off to give Buffalo what they need and for that team to be able to compete with Eichel once they got him.I guess the real question is who's the GM and coach here when the hypothetical deal goes down?
Am I the only one who would look long and hard at offering Pettersson in an Eichel trade?
Tough call. Eichel is more sure but likely has higher contract going forward. Canucks would be better now, as Eichel is more proven as a full time center and his relative size is a benefit. Is it enough of a difference to take the risk, probably not.I don't know. Like I said, you'd really want to do your homework.
My impression of Eichel is that he's a very competitive guy who wants to win and is frustrated at being stuck in a sad-sack organization. Seems like he's trying to demand improvement and excellence from the people around him. But I'd be lying if I said that Buffalo was one of the teams I followed most closely so I'm not going to say that my take is absolutely correct.
I feel like Pettersson would have similar things to say about multiple years on a losing team, though. Strikes me as a bit of a similar personality.
Is definitely not cooked, oven isnt preheated yet.Eichel has like 1 ES goal all season. Looks cooked
Id trade anyone on our roster for eichel, and I think there's an argument for keeping horvat as a high end, relatively cheaper 2C behind him but its kind of a win win whether it is horvat or ep staying.Am I the only one who would look long and hard at offering Pettersson in an Eichel trade?
After an off-season of hell, having a new shiny player without the emotional baggage of remembering how shitty the team is without Markstrom and Tanev might be a legitimate way out of this mess.Id trade anyone on our roster for eichel, and I think there's an argument for keeping horvat as a high end, relatively cheaper 2C behind him but its kind of a win win whether it is horvat or ep staying.
I would obviously rather try the hot quantity approach first, Miller 1st Virtanen Pod might look pretty enticing to Buffalo management.
As bad as Jim has been, the emotional baggage of Buffalo for Jack's career has been significantly worse than what Petterson has experienced.After an off-season of hell, having a new shiny player without the emotional baggage of remembering how shitty the team is without Markstrom and Tanev might be a legitimate way out of this mess.
Thats dumb as hellI wouldn't trade Pettersson for Eichel straight up as things stand right now.
They are equitable players but Pettersson is younger and fits our contention window better.
If Pettersson forces a horrendous contract that walks him straight to UFA then maybe I'd reconsider.
I'd rather trade a big package like Horvat+Boeser+ than deal Pettersson 1 for 1.
.
How come?Thats dumb as hell
I'd do Hughes, Miller, and our unprotected 1st.Am I the only one who would look long and hard at offering Pettersson in an Eichel trade?