2019 Draft Thread: We Already Got a Kaapo

Status
Not open for further replies.

Digitalbooya

By order of the Peaky Blinders
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2010
26,440
7,319
Wisconsin
I've seen Cole Caufield anywhere from 10th-30th in NHL mock drafts. Will likely fall due to his size but he has the skill, abilities and handedness that the Wild could really use.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,012
19,730
MN
forwards with skill. Might be possible to pick up local boy, LHD Ben Brinkman in the 2nd, but it all depends on how his year with the Gophers go. A couple of years ago I would've said he was a surefire 1st rounder...we'll see.
 

AJ Thelen

Registered User
Nov 19, 2010
2,490
308
Pontypandy
I really like Alex Turcotte. Competing center with speed. He might go a bit high for us tho.

Guskov looks good as well. Very skilled, but he is not a very speedy one.

Fenton will probably draft a defenseman anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mancini79

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,252
1,617
We all know Minnesota is going to go a) size b) hockey sense and c) character. They are going to convince everyone that they know better than everyone else in the draft and we're going to reach for a questionable prospect with a safe floor, but no ceiling that'll muck around the bottom 6/bottom pairing for a few years.
 

AJ Thelen

Registered User
Nov 19, 2010
2,490
308
Pontypandy
We all know Minnesota is going to go a) size b) hockey sense and c) character. They are going to convince everyone that they know better than everyone else in the draft and we're going to reach for a questionable prospect with a safe floor, but no ceiling that'll muck around the bottom 6/bottom pairing for a few years.

This is a scenario that scares me. Why can't we draft a high risk high reward type of player?
 

Bazeek

Registered Lurker
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2011
17,883
11,253
Exiled in Madison
We all know Minnesota is going to go a) size b) hockey sense and c) character. They are going to convince everyone that they know better than everyone else in the draft and we're going to reach for a questionable prospect with a safe floor, but no ceiling that'll muck around the bottom 6/bottom pairing for a few years.
We should probably give Fenton a full year at the helm before deciding he's been completely possessed by the franchise egregore.
 

Wabit

Registered User
May 23, 2016
19,268
4,417
We all know Minnesota is going to go a) size b) hockey sense and c) character. They are going to convince everyone that they know better than everyone else in the draft and we're going to reach for a questionable prospect with a safe floor, but no ceiling that'll muck around the bottom 6/bottom pairing for a few years.

MN doesn't really draft for size, most of their draftees the last few years have been 6'0" or smaller.
 

chchelseII

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
1,332
378
We should probably give Fenton a full year at the helm before deciding he's been completely possessed by the franchise egregore.

Egregore, nice! Where how did this word become part of your vocabulary, if I may ask?
 

Saga of the Elk

Honoured Person
May 31, 2008
3,145
948
MN doesn't really draft for size, most of their draftees the last few years have been 6'0" or smaller.

It's about half and half for 2018. I hope the days of drafting guys purely for size (Gabriel, Chizen, Faith) are over. But of course it's no accident that Jordan Greenway and Marcus Foligno are in the NHL while Kyle Rau and Sam Anas are not.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,012
19,730
MN
I don't even know what that word means, and I'm not going to look it up, for fear it means something icky that is advertised in the back of City Pages.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,012
19,730
MN
It's about half and half for 2018. I hope the days of drafting guys purely for size (Gabriel, Chizen, Faith) are over. But of course it's no accident that Jordan Greenway and Marcus Foligno are in the NHL while Kyle Rau and Sam Anas are not.
Hey, it's not like character and size have to be avoided.
 

Saga of the Elk

Honoured Person
May 31, 2008
3,145
948
Hey, it's not like character and size have to be avoided.

If you can play, you can play. I think it's fair to assume that the Wild have avoided drafting guys like Point, Debrincat, and Gaudreau. The Preds took a chance on Arvidsson though.
 

Victorious Secret

2024 Lottery Winner
Jul 18, 2011
14,869
455
Matt's Meat Market
Why make a point of taking high character guys if you aren't gonna take a chance on someone risky? If you have a room with 'high character' guys then you should be able to mold the ones that need it every once in a while.

At the same time, if these guys were such high character, then they wouldn't have made such a rift with the young guys.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,012
19,730
MN
Why make a point of taking high character guys if you aren't gonna take a chance on someone risky? If you have a room with 'high character' guys then you should be able to mold the ones that need it every once in a while.

At the same time, if these guys were such high character, then they wouldn't have made such a rift with the young guys.
Well, to be fair to the Wild, Nino, Heatley, Sokolov, and Kaprizov were all considered risky acquisitions due to character(maybe not KK..). One just has to go back to the drama when Havlat was on the team, or, to a lesser extent, Quincey, to remember what turmoil problem players can create around a team.

Sokolov and KK ...nobody was picking them besides us. From what I've read about Ho-Sang, he seems to be an entitled guy with skills that match his opinion of himself. DeAngelo? Meh, rather have Belpedio.

Duclair? I would have gone for him. Seemed to be a low risk, high reward situation. He doesn't seem to be setting the world on fire, but would add some skill to a bottom six.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,012
19,730
MN
If you can play, you can play. I think it's fair to assume that the Wild have avoided drafting guys like Point, Debrincat, and Gaudreau. The Preds took a chance on Arvidsson though.

All those guys are nutz. Arvidsson is fantastic. Point and Debrincat just have that scoring knack...Point has crazy speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mancini79

Wabit

Registered User
May 23, 2016
19,268
4,417
If you can play, you can play. I think it's fair to assume that the Wild have avoided drafting guys like Point, Debrincat, and Gaudreau. The Preds took a chance on Arvidsson though.

To be fair:
-Gaudreau was a 4th round pick, every team avoided him at least once. The Wild could have picked him up with the laste 1st (Phillips) or late 2nd (Lucia) picks I guess
-Debrincat went mid 2nd; they could have used their mid 1st (Kunin) pick on him.
-Point went 1 pick before Belpedio in the mid 3rd; they could have used the mid 1st (Tuch) to pick him.
- At the time all of these picks would have been considered reaches similar to the one they took with FJ this last year. Hindsight really helps a lot for these guys. They all could have turned out like a Schroeder (mid 1st) and then the pick is considered a bust.

Blame the GM for not having the draft picks in whatever years to possibly take these players, but using 1st's on guys that go in the 3rd round or later means you're a genius or an idiot (depending on how they turn out). They've also had their own bad picks (Gabriel, Lucia, Phillips).
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,012
19,730
MN
To be fair:
-Gaudreau was a 4th round pick, every team avoided him at least once. The Wild could have picked him up with the laste 1st (Phillips) or late 2nd (Lucia) picks I guess
-Debrincat went mid 2nd; they could have used their mid 1st (Kunin) pick on him.
-Point went 1 pick before Belpedio in the mid 3rd; they could have used the mid 1st (Tuch) to pick him.
- At the time all of these picks would have been considered reaches similar to the one they took with FJ this last year. Hindsight really helps a lot for these guys. They all could have turned out like a Schroeder (mid 1st) and then the pick is considered a bust.

Blame the GM for not having the draft picks in whatever years to possibly take these players, but using 1st's on guys that go in the 3rd round or later means you're a genius or an idiot (depending on how they turn out). They've also had their own bad picks (Gabriel, Lucia, Phillips).
I think your point that the Wild didn't have the mid round picks to use on "risks" is the most telling. I think part of good drafting is just accumulating enough lottery tickets(picks), and getting lucky on one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad