Trading Krug for Athanasiou?
Nope. This thread is ridiculous. Heinen for picks and we keep Backes? Ew.
First....who is taking Backes?
If you want to suggest trading him and keeping Heinen...fine. But IMO we’d need to add to any deal just to move him at his age and contract. And that makes the top 9 very soft. No problem if it’s him instead of Heinen, as long as the price to move Backes isn’t too much.
Second, the Krug for AA (a 30 goal scorer on a crap team, BTW) and Heinen for picks trades were suggested in order to allow the Bruins to resign Johansson.
People can crap on the idea all day long, but I find it funny how soon people forget how weak the forward group was prior to the Coyle and Johansson additions, even with Teflon Dan and his amazing CORSI and whopping 13 points between October and January.
In the end which lineup is better?
With Krug and Heinen:
Marchand - Bergeron - Pasta
DeBrusk - Krejci - Backes
????? - Coyle - Heinen
Blidh/Kuraly/Nordstrom/ Wagner
Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
Moore, Grizz, Clifton, Vaak, Lauzon
Or
Marchand - Bergeron - Pasta
DeBrusk - Krejci - Athanasiou
Johansson - Coyle - Backes
Fourth Line
Chara - McAvoy
Grizz - Carlo
Moore, Clifton, Vaak, Lauzon
IMO the lineup without Johansson looks a lot more concerning than the one without Krug. Especially when you consider the quality of prospects at each position.
I think that there’s a much better chance that Vaakanainen or Lauzon (espy. Vaakanainen) become legit difference makers on defense to replace Krug than the forwards do in replacing Johansson.
Bash away.