GloryDaze4877
Barely Irrelevant
Where did you get this from. For some reason my phone won’t let me scroll down and I’d like to see it
Here’s the link to the website:
Projecting NHL Skater Contracts for the 2019 Offseason
Where did you get this from. For some reason my phone won’t let me scroll down and I’d like to see it
Dumping the on and off again Miller and shedding his cap hit might be a better way of doing it. Some team will bite on it. They always bite on D- men. But it’s a great post.First....who is taking Backes?
If you want to suggest trading him and keeping Heinen...fine. But IMO we’d need to add to any deal just to move him at his age and contract. And that makes the top 9 very soft. No problem if it’s him instead of Heinen, as long as the price to move Backes isn’t too much.
Second, the Krug for AA (a 30 goal scorer on a crap team, BTW) and Heinen for picks trades were suggested in order to allow the Bruins to resign Johansson.
People can crap on the idea all day long, but I find it funny how soon people forget how weak the forward group was prior to the Coyle and Johansson additions, even with Teflon Dan and his amazing CORSI and whopping 13 points between October and January.
In the end which lineup is better?
With Krug and Heinen:
Marchand - Bergeron - Pasta
DeBrusk - Krejci - Backes
????? - Coyle - Heinen
Blidh/Kuraly/Nordstrom/ Wagner
Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
Moore, Miller, Grizz, Clifton, Vaak, Lauzon
Or
Marchand - Bergeron - Pasta
DeBrusk - Krejci - Athanasiou
Johansson - Coyle - Backes
Fourth Line
Chara - McAvoy
Grizz - Carlo
Moore, Miller, Clifton, Vaak, Lauzon
IMO the lineup without Johansson looks a lot more concerning than the one without Krug. Especially when you consider the quality of prospects at each position.
I think that there’s a much better chance that Vaakanainen or Lauzon (espy. Vaakanainen) become legit difference makers on defense to replace Krug than the forwards do in replacing Johansson.
Bash away.
Dumping the on and off again Miller and shedding his cap hit might be a better way of doing it. Some team will bite on it. They always bite on D- men. But it’s a great post.
Saw something on Twitter today pertaining to the offseason. There is a site than takes all the salary info from CapFriendly and point production and tries to project what FA’s will get this summer.
Interesting stuff:
Ideal offseason with capfriendlys estimate of $83 cap giving the bruins $15.778m in space.
Outgoing contracts:
- Trade Kevan Miller for a 3rd round pick, frees up $2.5m towards the cap
- Trade Backes and attach a 2nd round pick in a salary dump, frees up $6m
New cap space after trades: $24.778m
RFA/UFA’s retained:
-sign McAvoy 6y/$36m ($6m AAV)
- sign Carlo 4y/$ 19.6m (4.9 AAV)
-sign heinen 4yr/$12.5m (3.125 AAV)
- sign Johansson 3y/$13.5m (4.5 AAV)
New cap space: $6.25m
Free Agent signings:
- sign Michael Ferlund 4y/$17m (4.25 AAV)
New cap space: $2.03m
Marchand-bergy-pasta
Debrusk-krejci-Johansson
Ferlund- coyle-heinen
Wagner-kuraly-Nordstrom/acciari
Chara-McAvoy
Krug-Carlo
Gryz-Clifton
Rask
Halak
I’d stay far away from Ferland. Generally speaking he’s the type of player I like, but I can’t shake the feeling that he’d be another Beleskey.
Ferlund has back to back 40+ Point seasons. Beleskeys top two seasons were 37 and 32
There's something really broken in the game if Cody Ceci gets a better contract than Brandon Carlo
This can’t wait until the offseason?
I looked at the 3 yr. projections and it’s interesting/intriguing in many cases.
The following group of UFA at 3 yrs.
Anders Lee @ 5.51
Zuccarello @ 5.64
Kevin Hayes @ 5.62 (absurd to me)
Johansson @ only 4.4
Ferland @ 4.1 (wouldn’t touch it)
To me, Johansson is much better than Ferland and Hayes.
Surprised Zuccarello comes in higher than Lee as well.
At the next lockoutit almost turns me off to see some of these numbers associated with some of these players... and then the teams come to the taxpayers and tell us they cant be competitive without handouts and new arenas.
I wonder where the breaking point comes
Signing Johansson would be my first choiceI looked at the 3 yr. projections and it’s interesting/intriguing in many cases.
The following group of UFA at 3 yrs.
Anders Lee @ 5.51
Zuccarello @ 5.64
Kevin Hayes @ 5.62 (absurd to me)
Johansson @ only 4.4
Ferland @ 4.1 (wouldn’t touch it)
To me, Johansson is much better than Ferland and Hayes.
Surprised Zuccarello comes in higher than Lee as well.
I imagine some posters who find no fun in this sort of stuff probably could wait till offseason or even longer. I suspect a few will pass a harsh judgement on those of us that do have fun with it and will try to belittle it without offering anything of value or will even go further to try to shut it up.
but... honestly I can have fun watching hockey games when they are on and spending hours every day just thinking about the team I love and what it might do in the future.
I assume some other fans are like me and I am happy they are having some fun here too.
we dont want to make anyone miserable... so for those of you who cant have fun, I suggest they all wait until the offseason or whenever they feel they might have something to add to the discussion
This can’t wait until the offseason?
There's something really broken in the game if Cody Ceci gets a better contract than Brandon Carlo
I’m not being sarcastic, but how often do you watch Ceci play outside of when the B’s face the Sens?
I love Carlo’s game and how he has improved this year, but it appears that he will never put up much in the way of points, particularly when he is paired with a PMD like Krug. That will keep his salary lower than more offensive minded D, even if he’s better overall.
I would not categorize Ceci as an “offensive guy”, but he puts up better numbers than Carlo. Also, he has played on a dumpster fire of a team the last couple of seasons, which doesn’t do much for the stats. He has averaged 23+ minutes a game for the last three years, which is 1st pair D TOI, even if it is a bad team.
In addition, this is Ceci’s 4th contract and he’s 25/26 years old. Carlo is 22/23 and just coming off his ELC, so that’s not really a comparable situation at all.
I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Ceci got a little more than Carlo, when you look at everything.
krug will turn 29 before his next contract starts... can you name a single undersized offensive dman that didnt see his production levels drop in half between age 29 and 33?
theres been a couple undersized dmen like brian ralfalski and the guy that was just finishing up in Winnipeg last year who were good enough defensively that their teams were still playing them at 33-34 years of age... but most guys are finished by this time
I dont think krug has the defensive skill to be useful if his point totals drop in half... and if his new contract calls for a raise its going to be tough. my plan would be to offer him more money on a shorter term. im not sure how he and his agent will want to proceed.
I know. Just going with my gut and based on what I saw vs. Carolina last week.
He was pretty invisible, IMO.
Snapshot of course, but I’d have liked to have seen him do something in the biggest games of his season.