Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Brodeur, Mar 5, 2018.
Thank God, finally some more Leaf's coverage!
I'm thinking people are misreading what I said... Was referring to the expected different reactions toward different teams
Wow, I’m never buying the hockey news ever again , just unbelieveable
Always a favorite issue of mine, will definitely be getting it.
Distribution is low...time to pander!
I've not logged in or posted here in a long long time.
Maybe I'll start posting more. I feel like I could bring a great deal to this seemingly great community.
I was searching this issue... and I found out it is coming soon thanks to this thread.
I called my local magazine place. Not stocked yet.
welcome back Patty!
The picture itself is fine. The caption leaves something to be desired however.
Who cares who is on the cover? Maybe people should be asking themselves why they even care? Put a pretty girl on the cover. Maybe then no one would complain sheesh!
I only care whether the content inside is good or not.
That headline in the cover means one of the main stories in the issue will be about the imminent Leaf cup dynasty. Honestly the whole magazine is geared around marketing objectives, not providing quality information.
Has THN told HF to specifically not link to their stuff? I didn’t know their content was that bad.
Nah it just gives everyone a good laugh
Yah all you need is 2 of the best 3 centers in the game...does Toronto have that?
I live in Ontario and I'm not a Leafs fan. You can't turn on a sports TV or radio station without hearing the name Matthews.
I go to Montreal for work often and all I hear is how the habs and Bergeron suck... what’s your point?
You mean when you turn on a Toronto sports radio station you actually have to hear Toronto sports news?
I bet you’re the type that goes to the Keg and then complains there’s not enough vegan options available on the menu
Your conflation of Ontario with Toronto pretty much proves the point.
Ranking anyone 21-and-under as a prospect is a stupid criteria. David Pastrnak has played almost 4 full years in the NHL, he's not a prospect.
If I pick up a magazine called 'Future Watch' I want to know about guys who aren't NHL regulars.
Depends on what they are mean when they say future watch. If they are talking about the future of the organization then they should include players under 21 (arguably anyone under 25 for that matter). That's a much better gauge of the team's ability to complete over the next several years than the guys that haven't played at all.
Bulk of the magazine will be about non-NHLers; Namely the top 100 which many of us will put entirely too much stock into. The 21 and under NHLers just contribute to the overall team grade by their criteria. There's always some confusion every year when this ranking comes out when a team with fewer prospects in the top 50/100 gets a higher grade than a team with more prospects in the ranking.
When is this going on shelves in Canada?? I look forward to this every year!
Separate names with a comma.