Assume the Bozak and Beagle rumours are true, and adding Reaves for some semblance of grit:
Baertschi-Horvat(C)-Boeser
Pettersson-Bozak-Eriksson
Granlund-Sutter(A)-Virtanen
Gagner-Beagle-Reaves
Motte
Edler(A)-Gudbranson
Del Zotto-Tanev(A)
Pouliot-Biega
Hughes-Stetcher
Markstrom
Nilsson
- I think only one of Baertschi or Goldobin make it to training camp. I see them going in a package for a decent 2019 pick or prospect in return for taking on some salary (Hossa? Spezza?). I see Baertschi getting the edge due to some chemistry with Bo.
- I see Gaunce and Hutton being moved as well
- Gaudette, Dahlen, Juolevi, Demko start in Utica; will all appear by December
All in all, this roster is similar to the one from last year, albeit without the security of the Sedins eating up minutes, it also can afford to be a bit quicker. They will live and die playing a transition game which is something that Edler and Gudbranson do not excel at. I hope infusing this team with some elite playmakers (Pettersson and Hughes) will invigorate the PP1, and a more wide open league will benefit the team getting younger, faster, and more dynamic in transition. I realize this is a lot to ask for two rookies, especially one playing D, so success will probably be mixed.
Best case scenario, the Canucks take a page out of the VGK book, and spread scoring around across 4 lines, outscore their problems, all while goaltending shuts the door and challenge for a playoff spot. A likely downfall is that, like most years, the Canucks lack of depth on the blueline as well as up-and-down goaltending fails to hold up to the rigors of the NHL season. The knock on Tanev is that he can't be counted on for 82 games, but I would just like to ask "is that really so bad, and why should that be the expectation?"
The Canucks have seemingly "raised the floor" when it comes to defensive depth, however, and with the "bottom 5 (?)" defensemen all possessing similar skill sets, perhaps the key for this defense corps is to use rest and rotate them all in effectively. I am not sure why, but the NHL in particular is hung up on GP as a badge of honour when the NBA and MLB have tweaked their algorithms to incorporate rest more into their metrics (even true aces like Verlander and Kershaw break down). I am not an advanced stats zealot when it comes to the NHL, but maybe if rate stats (X/60Mins) rather than counting stats become more mainstream, the usage of players will also change as well.