You would know better since I don't watch the prospects very much at all, but the scoring might too generous. For example, based on your scoring of Frost, the overall package rates as a 70+ grade, which translates as a HOF talent. I think Gretzky would be an 80; Claude Giroux might be a 65?
Frost averaged is ~65 per, not 70+. That is probably fair for blue-chip/high-end prospects. I could see an argument for him losing 5 points in a couple of those categories though. You could drop his IQ, by 5 and his hands/skating by 5 and receive no argument from me.
Ok, Vorobyev with the 45 in hands/skating and a 55 in playmaking????
Ratcliffe and Allison as 60 grade skaters?? You’ve got Morin with the same hands rating as Vorobyev.
I find Vorobyev's hands a little chunky, which is fine. The way he uses his body makes up for it. As for how is it the same as Morin's? Well, it may be a small sample size, but I thought Morin improved his hands quite a lot from the previous season. Having those two at the same grade isn't a slight to Voroybev.
Vorobyev's skating is definitely slightly below average. He has a good stride, but really lacks explosiveness, which is probably the most important aspect of skating. Having a burst in your step is how you create separation. Vorobyev is lacking in that regard so, his skating takes a hit.
Allison on the other hand has some real burst that can surprise defenders. In addition he has better top end speed. I think a 60 is very fair for him. Ratcliffe isn't quite as bursty as Allison, but it is still better than Vorobyev and he is an exceptionally smooth skater for his size. Very few 6'5''+ guys can move like he does.
And originally I was torn between 55-60 for Vorobyev's playmaking. I'd be fine if you think it is worth 60, I'm not too attached to that score I gave him on that.