Bauhaus
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2019
- 55
- 24
Same system as Avs then
What games are you watching? We are one of the better teams in the league at keeping shot counts down, especially 5v5.
Same system as Avs then
I believe he had an assist.
What games are you watching? We are one of the better teams in the league at keeping shot counts down, especially 5v5.
Avs give up 32 shots per game, 12th worst in the league. Eagles give up 33 shots per game, 2nd worst in the league.
The Eagles run all the same systems as the Avs.
Good to know. I would like to add a few things.
We've had 2,497 shots against this season which makes us 18th in the league.
Of those, only 1,877 were 5v5 (which is top 8 in the league). Therefore, 620 of the remaining shots against were on man advantage situations.
We are the worst team in taking too many penalties. We are an extremely undisciplined team. When we are playing 5v5 hockey, and stay out of the box, we are one of the more defensively responsible teams. (oh the irony)
That said, I don't know much about the Eagles stats. Are most of their shots coming on man disadvantages as well? (Truly curious). I have a feeling the give up a lot of shots in all situations which isn't the same as our situation, but I could certainly be wrong.
And I do apologize for my ignorance, I truly don't know where to find stats for AHL teams. I am curious to look at both to see how closely they correlate.
Nothing to apologize for.
The Eagles are just as bad, if not worse on taking dumb penalties, and are a pretty decent defensive 5v5 team as well. I don't know the numbers on even strength shots against, but since they lead the league in PIM's per game I would assume the Eagles give up a lot of shots on the PK.
The Eagles real problems defensively (and offense and special teams even more so) is that they run the Avs systems but don't have the right players to play those systems for the most part.
Here is where I got the AHL stats from if you ever want to check them out:
AHL 2019-03-31
How would you describe that system and the type of players that work well with it, for a non-expert like me to understand? Please.
A lot of forechequing skills are required for both systems; the NHL and AHL. I haven't chequed the Avs, but both teams take an absurd amount of penalties in the offencive zone because of it (what Hench was alluding to in the past). Eagles are the second most penalized team in the AHL and when getting rid of one crazy sample-sized in Geertsen, they're still in the top 5-7.One argument I read online is that both the Eagles and Avalanche have fast rosters, but run slow systems.
I haven't seen the Eagles play this year, but if it's anything like the Avs' system then they do a lot of high/low work, generate their offense via shots from the point and work from there.
A wild Timmins appears!
So Dater gives like 3 separate updates with specific dates of when Timmins is supposed to return but is wrong every time. Then he says Timmins is shut down for the year and a week later he’s practicing.
Great work, Adrian.
A++
I think assuming “shut down for the season” means shutting him down completely would make more sense than assuming no games but will continue to practice.Why would we assume "shut down" meant not even practicing? Especially when he's been practicing fine. I thought it was obvious that "shut down" meant not getting any games in this year.
As far as the "3 separate updates" thing...I personally don't think Dater cares enough about prospects to just make up dates--he's shown in the past that he has little regard for them. To me, it makes more sense that those were dates someone in the organization told him they "had hopes" for him to have made more progress towards a return to game-action.
I think assuming “shut down for the season” means shutting him down completely would make more sense than assuming no games but will continue to practice.
Dater tweeted out multiple times that he was being shut down for the season and it’s supposed to be my fault that I never figured out from that that Timmins will continue to practice but won’t play games? Give me a break.
As for the date updates. You can tell me Dater don’t care about prospects or whatever all you want. I’m just saying he was incorrect multiple times on the subject.
I’m not going to argue with you on that all day. I think it’s much more logical to assume that the quote “shutting him down for the season” means exactly that rather than thinking he will practice but won’t play organized games.I'm asking why that would make more sense when he had been, for quite some time, practicing with seemingly no issues? The ultimate goal was him getting games in at the end of the season. He traveled with the Eagles, had been practicing with the Avs, but I read the decision to "shut down" as a final call as to whether he'd play any games this year, not that he'd just stop practicing (especially when there hadn't been any reports of him having difficulty practicing).
As for the date updates. You can tell me Dater don’t care about prospects or whatever all you want. I’m just saying he was incorrect multiple times on the subject.
You can defend him all you want but I said nothing incorrect in my post. Dater tweeted out misleading information about him being shut down and gave incorrect dates on multiple occasions. I don’t care where the info came from in the first place. I’m just pointing out his incompetence. If he’s learning things from poor sources that’s also on him and he should just shut his mouth instead of tweeting out things that “might” be right.
Then when you say things like “why would you assume shut down means not practicing” I put my guard up because if you simply re-read that quote before you posted it you would know exactly why I assumed that. It’s much more logical to assume being “shut down for the year” means not playing hockey at all than to assume he practices but don’t play games.
There were multiple stints this year where Timmins stopped practicing for days at a time and at least once he was shut down for a couple of weeks.If Timmins had either not been practicing the way he has been or had numerous starts-then-stops w/r/t practicing, then I would agree with you.
Given that once he started practicing I don't think he ever really stopped (he just hadn't progressed enough), that's where I disagree.
Alas, we both have said what we feel.
Agreed with RL, there's nothing misleading there. If he said flat-out that he WOULD play, then yeah, that's misleading.
How much longer does Barbs have on his conditioning stint before he has to be called back up?