We need another serious goalie prospect at some point considering we have no one in the pipeline now.
I guess I'm going to hang this out there for my own benefit.
The reason I have Foote, Hague, and Joseph on my board is because any of the forwards I had penciled in would be going by the 15-18th slot. Not to mention I don't see the need for any forward depth in the first round, in this draft. We're already seeing the next influx of forward depth playing here now and add in Cirelli, Joseph, Stephens, Raddysh, and Howden I guess one can make an argument for a center. I'm just not sure I want to do so in the first round
Foote intrigues me because as he's the more complete player than Hague or Joseph. The knock on Hague has been his skating and, to a certain extent, that's true. I just don't see it as a detriment as much as others but's that's why they're pro scouts versus someone who casually does this.
You shouldn't draft for need, I get that. There needs to be some emphasis on the defensive depth though. Its still the org's deepest void.
The deepest void is top 6 forwards. Looking at our prospects we are flush with bottom 6 guys, Raddysh, Katchouk and Howden have 2nd line potential. Still missing that top line potential player, he won't be there at 15 or so but should get us a 2nd liner. On the back end with Koekkoek, Hajek and Masin someone like Hague just adds to clutter since I don't see a top pair defender, same with Joseph. Foote would be ok since we aren't as strong on the right but don't like him that early, isn't good value for the pick.
With the 2nd round looking better for forwards than defenders we could pick two up there and go D in the 1st. But I wouldn't pick Foote, Hague, Joseph or Timmins before 20, so unless one of the top 4, Liljegren, Makar, Heiskanen or Valimaki, fall i would take the forward at 15 or trade down.
So which of these draft-eligible forwards have top 6 potential at the 15-18 slot this summer?
We need another serious goalie prospect at some point considering we have no one in the pipeline now.
Poehling, Necas and Suzuki have 2C potential. Pettersson, Andersson and Yamamoto top 6 wings, Kostin has top 6 potential but question marks with health.
Top 4 defenders are more valuable than most 2nd line forwards. The thing is though that you can move those wings down the lineup to give you more depth. There's only so many spots on the defense. If we move one of Koekkoek or Masin than bringing in another top 4 potential LD makes sense.
Poehling is a college commit so why would you burn a pick (in this draft caliber) on him? Plus I don't see him being there by the time the Lightning are on the clock even if they considered it. Necas is a winger, Suzuki I'm not seeing a top 2 C role anywhere, more of a 3rd line/PK role. He has smarts and decent speed. The size and how young he is doesn't scare me off at all.
I'm sorry but if you have a chance to pick up a natural RHD, with the overall caliber of this draft class (down compared to previous 3-5 yrs), you would think you do so. I'm not saying Foote would be Hedman, Stralman, or even Koekkoek or Dotchins replacement but eventually Masin, Hajek's and Cernak's will rotate up. Why not have another potential 4-6 still in the A because outside the aforementioned, that's all that's in the cupboard.
Poehling isn't a college commit, he's in college. Was one of if not the youngest player there.
The NCAA is closer to getting guys ready for the NHL than the CHL. Poehling could easily do 1 more year next year then come out and compete for a spot, most likely he does two and makes the jump. .
So as of now we're picking 14, right? (Barring some luck with the lottery that moves us in the top 3).
You probably got better odds at 5 numbers on Power Ball and the third slot is Vegas'
Vegas isn't locked into 3 - they get to play with the odds as if they finished the season #3. Conceivably they could then fall as low as #6 (although that's highly unlikely).