The first thing they said was "muh warrior muh guy you win with"
Not a great sign
The first thing they said was "muh warrior muh guy you win with"
Not a great sign
Andersson at 21? Great. Andersson at 7? Awful. Just awful. You don't waste that high of a pick on a guy who likely tops out as a 2nd line two-way player. You just don't.
He just put up 19 in 42 in Sweden.
If he's in the NHL anytime soon, it's as a 4th liner.
They don't learn from all the off the board picks that didn't work.
If he can make the NHL sooner than later I like the pick even more.
I don't know who this kid is so I'm neither elated or outraged.
This thread is certainly not very reassuring though.
I was unaware that Pierre now had credibility. Interesting.
This is a great pick, even if it is a "reach". He's solid for sure!!
So we trade our 1C to go for a "solid" pick at 7? Why are we going for a safe player that high up?
Why doesn't this board have a "remind me" function.. check back in a few years
You act as if 19 in 42 in Sweden as a young player is terrible.
You act as if 19 in 42 in Sweden as a young player is terrible.
Who else is better there? They went BPA, as per usual. This is a solid pick, nonetheless
Same **** as the Stepan thread.