Uncle Gary
Registered User
- Apr 12, 2014
- 5,206
- 2,583
Any lineup with DD in it looks horrible. Also one of Hudon or Anrighetto has to go. Way too many small guys in the lineup.
Any lineup with DD in it looks horrible. Also one of Hudon or Anrighetto has to go. Way too many small guys in the lineup.
Any lineup with DD in it looks horrible. Also one of Hudon or Anrighetto has to go. Way too many small guys in the lineup.
I'm not too sure about putting Pacioretty-Galchenyuk-Radulov on the same line. Pacioretty will touch the net 300 times in the season, thats without counting the shots that don't make it to the net. Radulov and Galchenyuk will be around 200 each. And they love to have the puck on their stick. Maybe splitting them up is a better idea.
Either : Pacioretty-Plekanec-Gallagher and xxx-Galchenyuk-Radulov
or
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk-Gallagher and xxx-Plekanec-Radulov.
Radulov is a far better playmaker than he is shooter. Putting him with our two best shooters makes sense. The three of them together will drive possession like nobody's business. I've always wanted to see Galchenyuk play with a gifted one on one player. You might never get the puck off the two of them.
I'd be kosher with the lines you proposed, but I'd like to see Radulov tried with Patch and Chuck first.
How about something new? 4 offensive lines.
Pacioretty-Plekanec-Radulov
Shaw-Galchenyuk-Gallagher
Hudon-McCarron-Andrighetto
Carr-Desharnais-Danault
Mitchell/Flynn
Indeed pretty offensive... for our intelligence.