Salary Cap: 2016-17 Roster Building XXIII | Insert Witty Thread Title Here

Status
Not open for further replies.

shureshot66

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
11,031
35
All figures are cap numbers, not salaries.

2016-17 salary ceiling​
|
73,000,000​
Pens' projected spending |
76,114,806​
Approx. LTIR cushion |
3,750,000​
Deadline cap space |



PITTSBURGH PENGUINS
Forward.................
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
2018-19

Evgeni Malkin|
C​
|
30​
|
9,500,000​
|
9,500,000​
|
9,500,000​

Sidney Crosby|
C​
|
29​
|
8,700,000​
|
8,700,000​
|
8,700,000​

Phil Kessel|
RW​
|
29​
|
6,800,000​
|
6,800,000​
|
6,800,000​

Patric Hornqvist|
RW​
|
29​
|
4,250,000​
|
4,250,000​
|
UFA

Carl Hagelin|
LW​
|
28​
|
4,000,000​
|
4,000,000​
|
4,000,000​

Chris Kunitz|
LW​
|
37​
|
3,850,000​
|
UFA

Eric Fehr|
RW​
|
31​
|
2,000,000​
|
2,000,000​
|
UFA

Nick Bonino|
C​
|
28​
|
1,900,000​
|
UFA

Matt Cullen|
C​
|
40​
|
1,000,000​
|
UFA

Conor Sheary|
LW​
|
24​
|
667,500​
|
RFA

Bryan Rust|
RW​
|
24​
|
640,000​
|
640,000​
|
RFA

Scott Wilson|
LW​
|
24​
|
625,000​
|
625,000​
|
RFA

Tom Kuhnhackl|
LW​
|
24​
|
625,000​
|
625,000​
|
RFA
Defense.................
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
.2018-19

Kris Letang|
D​
|
29​
|
7,250,000​
|
7,250,000​
|
7,250,000​

Olli Maatta|
D​
|
22​
|
4,083,333​
|
4,083,333​
|
4,083,333​

Trevor Daley|
D​
|
33​
|
3,300,000​
|
UFA

Ian Cole|
D​
|
27​
|
2,100,000​
|
2,100,000​
|
UFA

Justin Schultz|
D​
|
26​
|
1,400,000​
|
RFA

Steve Oleksy|
D​
|
30​
|
575,000​
|
UFA

Chad Ruhwedel|
D​
|
26​
|
575,000​
|
UFA
Goalie............,.......
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
.2018-19

Marc-Andre Fleury|
G​
|
32​
|
5,750,000​
|
5,750,000​
|
5,750,000​

Matt Murray|
G​
|
22​
|
620,000​
|
3,750,000​
|
3,750,000​
|
RFA

Tristan Jarry|
G​
|
21​
|
589,167​
|
589,167​
|
RFA
Injured reserve.....
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
.2018-19

Pascal Dupuis|
RW​
|
37​
|
3,750,000​
|
UFA

Brian Dumoulin|
D​
|
25​
|
800,000​
|
RFA
Retained salary.....
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
.2018-19

Rob Scuderi|
D​
|
37​
|
1,125,000​



WILKES-BARRE/SCRANTON PENGUINS
Forward...............
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
2018-19

Thomas Di Pauli|
C​
|
22​
|
742,500​
|
742,500​
|
RFA

Jake Guentzel|
LW​
|
22​
|
734,167​
|
734,167​
|
734,167​

Teddy Blueger|
C​
|
22​
|
705,000​
|
705,000​
|
RFA

Oskar Sundqvist|
C​
|
22​
|
700,833​
|
RFA

Dominik Simon|
C​
|
22​
|
692,500​
|
692,500​
|
RFA

Josh Archibald|
RW​
|
24​
|
659,167​
|
RFA

Carter Rowney|
RW​
|
27​
|
612,500​
|
612,500​
|
UFA

Jean-Sebastien Dea|
C​
|
22​
|
585,000​
|
RFA

Kevin Porter|
C​
|
30​
|
575,000​
|
UFA

Garrett Wilson|
LW​
|
25​
|
575,000​
|
UFA

Danny Kristo|
RW​
|
26​
|
575,000​
|
UFA

Tom Sestito|
LW​
|
29​
|
575,000​
|
UFA
Defense...............
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
2018-19

Derrick Pouliot|
D​
|
22​
|
863,333​
|
RFA

Ethan Prow|
D​
|
24​
|
730,000​
|
730,000​
|
RFA

Lukas Bengtsson|
D​
|
22​
|
705,000​
|
705,000​
|
RFA

David Warsofsky|
D​
|
26​
|
575,000​
|
UFA

Cameron Gaunce|
D​
|
26​
|
575,000​
|
UFA

Stuart Percy|
D​
|
23​
|
575,000​
|
RFA

Tim Erixon|
D​
|
25​
|
575,000​
|
RFA
Goalie..................
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
2018-19



WHEELING NAILERS
Goalie..................
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
2016-17
|
2017-18
|
2018-19

Sean Maguire|
G​
|
23​
|
705,000​
|
705,000​
|
RFA



SIGNED PROSPECTS
Player
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
Current Team
|
Contract

Daniel Sprong|
F​
|
19​
|
Charlottetown (QMJHL)​
|
2 years, $692,500 per​



UNSIGNED PROSPECTS
Player​
|
Pos.
|
Age
|
Current Team (League)

Niclas Almari|
D​
|
18​
|HPK (Liiga)

Anthony Angello|
F​
|
20​
|Cornell (ECAC)

Dane Birks|
D​
|
21​
|Michigan Tech (WCHA)

Kasper Bjorkqvist|
F​
|
19​
|Providence (HEA)

Blaine Byron|
F​
|
21​
|Maine (HEA)

Filip Gustavsson|
G​
|
18​
|Luleå HF (SHL)

Connor Hall|
D​
|
18​
|Kitchener (OHL)

Ryan Jones|
D​
|
20​
|Nebraska-Omaha (NCHC)

Troy Josephs|
F​
|
22​
|Clarkson (ECAC)

Sam Lafferty|
F​
|
21​
|Brown (ECAC)

Joe Masonius|
D​
|
19​
|Connecticut (HEA)

Nikita Pavlychev|
F​
|
19​
|Penn State (B1G)

Alexander Pechurskiy|
G​
|
26​
|Amur Khabarovsk (KHL)

Jeff Taylor|
D​
|
22​
|Union (ECAC)

Frederik Tiffels|
F​
|
21​
|Western Michigan (NCHC)

Dominik Uher|
C​
|
23​
|HC Sparta Praha (ELH)
 
Last edited:

Speaking Moistly

What a terrible image.
Feb 19, 2013
39,728
7,402
Injured Reserve
I think Hags is getting underrated here. His arrival solidified our "speed" identity, and his two-way versatility improves our PK and any line he's on.

The Rags thought he'd be easily replaced too. He wasn't.

I'm not saying he's necessarily more valuable than Dumo/Maatta, but I believe it's close enough to make it a tough decision. Then again, players' stock fluctuates pretty wildly around here. Maatta was persona non grata not too long ago.

I think as well as he fits, he's still a tweener winger and that's always going to be less valuable than a top 4 D. This is also a team that needs PMDs as well, they have increased value for this team just like Hagelin does. Adding Daley was huge last season and having Schultz has been huge this season; we know what happens when the defense can't move the puck and we know how fragile Letang is. I'd rather keep him than lose him, but I'd rather keep the top 4 defensemen more. They have Rust now and Guentzel in the AHL whereas the D replacement is Cole. I want to bribe Vegas more than anything but if it came down to it I'm guaranteeing the top 4 is set.

I didn't do the "trade Maatta for a 7th!!!!!!! Bad contract!!!!" freakout.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,545
22,072
Pittsburgh
I think Hags is getting underrated here. His arrival solidified our "speed" identity, and his two-way versatility improves our PK and any line he's on.

The Rags thought he'd be easily replaced too. He wasn't.

I'm not saying he's necessarily more valuable than Dumo/Maatta, but I believe it's close enough to make it a tough decision. Then again, players' stock fluctuates pretty wildly around here. Maatta was persona non grata not too long ago.

Hags should be kept if at all possible for sure.

Maatta has definitely impressed me this year. And DP disappointing really changes my opinion on our ability to move Maatta.

As a team in short term contention, I would have no problem with us overpaying Vegas on a bribe in terms of a draft pick if it keeps our key players here now. I'd rather give away our presumably late first and lose Fehr than lose any of Hags, Horny, Rust, Dumo, Maatta, Sundqvist, or Schultz right now.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,598
25,419
I don't want to lose Hagelin. He's a pretty useful guy.

But I really don't want to lose our top 4. Assuming these guys are considered top 4 at the end of the season, which seems fairly safe.
 

ColePens

RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
Mar 27, 2008
107,025
67,650
Pittsburgh
Comparing the worth of both Hags/Hornqvist is near impossible. Hags, at his absolute worst, is giving us a great forecheck/backcheck. Hornqivst, at his worst, is still our best net-front guy that we desperately needed for years.

Unless you can come up with a plan to replace what they do, they shouldn't be moved. WC is the only one who at least brought an idea to the table that would replace one of them, even though it's highly unlikely.
 

Jacob

as seen on TV
Feb 27, 2002
49,559
25,249
We're just going to have to bribe LV, it's as simple as that. I'd go as high as a second round pick plus a non-essential prospect for draft assurances.
 

Penske

Kunitz wasn't there
Jan 13, 2016
5,262
2
We're just going to have to bribe LV, it's as simple as that. I'd go as high as a second round pick plus a non-essential prospect for draft assurances.

I posted something before about trading Dumoulin (plus something small) for Mantha and Smith. Mantha with Sid would be great and add to a powerful forward group. Smith can still be serviceable in the top 4 (and I think Detroit are looking to move him and they want young D). Or a similar type deal with another team.

We can protect Schultz and won't need to spend any assets in bribing. I'd say one of Bonino, Daley or Smith get signed by Vegas.
 

Shady Machine

Registered User
Aug 6, 2010
36,705
8,141
Maybe Cole. The draft is going to necessitate that we lose someone pretty valuable, and this deal would make it easier to go with 7F and 3D.

As much as I like Horny, he's only signed for a year after this one, and we should be wary about giving him a big money extension. Landeskog would take care of that.

You must value Dumo less than I do. We have no replacement for him. He's really valuable.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,545
22,072
Pittsburgh
You must value Dumo less than I do. We have no replacement for him. He's really valuable.

I think a part of his thinking is that we may lose one of our D-men or a guy like Hags/Horny in the expansion draft anyway. Trading Maatta or Dumo would be an option to avoid that without resorting to a bribe by replacing the 4th D with a 7th F. If we don't think we can bribe Vegas away from taking one of those guys, then I guess a move like this could make sense.
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,592
21,132
I think a part of his thinking is that we may lose one of our D-men or a guy like Hags/Horny in the expansion draft anyway. Trading Maatta or Dumo would be an option to avoid that without resorting to a bribe by replacing the 4th D with a 7th F. If we don't think we can bribe Vegas away from taking one of those guys, then I guess a move like this could make sense.

Yeah. I mean, I hope we can bribe LV to suit our ends, but I'm sure a lot of teams want to do that. If LV is serious about wanting to ice a competitive team right away, I can't imagine they're going to take bribes from every team that wants to make them.
 

Jacob

as seen on TV
Feb 27, 2002
49,559
25,249
:handclap: Cool feature taking the recent replies to the last thread to this one.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,545
22,072
Pittsburgh
Yeah. I mean, I hope we can bribe LV to suit our ends, but I'm sure a lot of teams want to do that. If LV is serious about wanting to ice a competitive team right away, I can't imagine they're going to take bribes from every team that wants to make them.

it'll be fine when nice guy Fleury waives his NMC :nod:
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,592
21,132
it'll be fine when nice guy Fleury waives his NMC :nod:

simpsons-awkward-collar-pull-o.gif
 

Shady Machine

Registered User
Aug 6, 2010
36,705
8,141
I think a part of his thinking is that we may lose one of our D-men or a guy like Hags/Horny in the expansion draft anyway. Trading Maatta or Dumo would be an option to avoid that without resorting to a bribe by replacing the 4th D with a 7th F. If we don't think we can bribe Vegas away from taking one of those guys, then I guess a move like this could make sense.

I guess that makes sense. If Schultz keeps up his play, I think I'd rather go 4d route and let the chips fall. Bribe Vegas to not lose Hagelin and then they take Rust. I love Rusty but he's not early as important as a young top 4 dman.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,598
25,419
I guess that makes sense. If Schultz keeps up his play, I think I'd rather go 4d route and let the chips fall. Bribe Vegas to not lose Hagelin and then they take Rust. I love Rusty but he's not early as important as a young top 4 dman.

I think I'd rather lose Hagelin than Rust tbh. Rust is younger, cheaper, supposedly more versatile and scores more goals. Maybe he isn't quite as good at Hagelin as being Hagelin but I think he makes up for it with the other stuff.

I'm just gonna pray for the miracle 7+3 with them taking a bribe not to take Schultz. In magic land that bribe somehow turns out to be Fleury but, you know, not happening.
 

AjaxTelamon

Registered User
Jul 8, 2011
6,071
1,827
Yeah. I mean, I hope we can bribe LV to suit our ends, but I'm sure a lot of teams want to do that. If LV is serious about wanting to ice a competitive team right away, I can't imagine they're going to take bribes from every team that wants to make them.

It would need to be a combination of exposing an asset with some problem, be it lack of control for very long, unwillingness to sign in Vegas, etc, with a nice bribe from us. If they want Schultz, for example, and his agent tells them he's not signing there past his 1 remaining RFA year, and we offer a 1st, then it's more than likely they take Rust or Fehr or MAF or whoever we do expose, and go on about their business.

Ideas of trading Dumo make my head hurt. I'd rather give them our late 1st than give up a guy we pretty much need, given his ability and the likelihood we can snag him for somewhere around 3m a year.

I just don't value that 1st round pick all that much, especially in what some are saying isn't a very strong draft.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,545
22,072
Pittsburgh
If we are exposing Schultz, we certainly shouldn't also be exposing Rust. He's easily in our top 7 forwards to protect.

And Schultz is definitely playing well enough to get him in the conversation of being more valuable than Dumo or Maatta to us. I don't like it, but I think we're in protect 4D territory.
 

Dread Pirate Roberts

Registered User
Jul 2, 2008
6,271
60
Mountain West
I guess that makes sense. If Schultz keeps up his play, I think I'd rather go 4d route and let the chips fall. Bribe Vegas to not lose Hagelin and then they take Rust. I love Rusty but he's not early as important as a young top 4 dman.

It'd probably be cheaper/easier to protect Hags and bribe them not to take Horny. How much value does a guy with one year on his deal have to an expansion team?
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,545
22,072
Pittsburgh
It'd probably be cheaper/easier to protect Hags and bribe them not to take Horny. How much value does a guy with one year on his deal have to an expansion team?

I would think a lot. Horny would almost certainly be top prize at the deadline. So let him help hit the cap floor, give them some experience, get a good powerplay guy, then likely trade him for a 1st in March.
 

AjaxTelamon

Registered User
Jul 8, 2011
6,071
1,827
If we are exposing Schultz, we certainly shouldn't also be exposing Rust. He's easily in our top 7 forwards to protect.

And Schultz is definitely playing well enough to get him in the conversation of being more valuable than Dumo or Maatta to us. I don't like it, but I think we're in protect 4D territory.

With a team as deep as we are, that will definitely mean losing OS, Hags, or Rust, I guess. That's rough. They'd take Hagelin in a second.

I'd much rather come up with a strategy / agreement with Vegas not to take that 4th D man. I value all of those assets above as much as that 1st rounder, probably including Rust (on 1 more year of his ultra-cheap deal).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad