Isn't that kind of a foregone conclusion at this point?
I think we definitely target Eriksson.
Him and Karlsson are BFFS. Eriksson provides MUCH needed puck-possession and scoring touch on the PP. He's also savvy player and 2 way guy who can play both winger positions.
Hoffman-Zibanejad-Eriksson
MacArthur-Turris-Ryan
Smith-Pageau-Stone
Look at those 3 lines babes.
Adding Erickson without subtracting anybody means diminishing returns. The improvement we get is offset by no longer giving somebody, say MacArthur, ice time in offensive situations. Then we're wasting the money we're paying him by not using him properly, as we watch his meagre trade value erode instead of rebuilding it.
I like him ,but with Mac and Hoffy ,he might be a bit expensive .For a top 9 wingerEriksson would be such a good addition, depending on cost of course. Plus it would add a LH shot to the PP, which should really help.
Agreed ,he isnt staying there .I wouldnt mind the lite version of him for that line howeverY'all need to stop putting our best forward on the third line.
When asked about trades he mentioned that it is unlikely that they go for a big trade and that they are most likely targeting role players.
Y'all need to stop putting our best forward on the third line.
And maybe a good 3rd line RW to replace Stone with JGP and Smith??Two points here:
1) "Unlikely they go for a big trade" seems to insinuate that Hoffman will not be dealt. I mean, maybe he still will be, but this leans the discussion more towards the "we're keeping him" side of things, and
2) I hope "most likely targeting role players" is referring to our 3rd pairing. Preferably a RD with effective PK experience on the regular.
Who is putting Mark Stone on the 3rd line?
Who is putting Mark Stone on the 3rd line?
I think a clever UFA forward and D acquisition can go a long way.
Hoffman-Zibanejad-Hudler
MacArthur-Turris-Ryan
Smith-Pageau-Stone
Paul/McCormick-Lazar-Chiasson/Dzingel
That's deeeep
Methot-Karlsson
Phaneuf-Ceci
Chabot-Polak/Lovejoy
OR
UFA-Wideman
Deeeep.
I feel like a Red Light district worker saying deeep so much, but that's very deep.
I think we definitely target Eriksson.
Him and Karlsson are BFFS. Eriksson provides MUCH needed puck-possession and scoring touch on the PP. He's also savvy player and 2 way guy who can play both winger positions.
Hoffman-Zibanejad-Eriksson
MacArthur-Turris-Ryan
Smith-Pageau-Stone
Look at those 3 lines babes.
post 956...Sensinitis
Ah. Missed that, thanks.
Hudler over Stone is crazy bananapants.
Maybe swap Stone and Hudler ,but yes i like that alotI think a clever UFA forward and D acquisition can go a long way.
Hoffman-Zibanejad-Hudler
MacArthur-Turris-Ryan
Smith-Pageau-Stone
Paul/McCormick-Lazar-Chiasson/Dzingel
That's deeeep
Methot-Karlsson
Phaneuf-Ceci
Chabot-Polak/Lovejoy
OR
UFA-Wideman
Deeeep.
I feel like a Red Light district worker saying deeep so much, but that's very deep.
2 weeks ago I might have called you crazy for suggesting we had a chance at Eriksson... but honestly, with all of the buzz around the Boucher hire, and Crow added as an assistant (who used to coach Eriksson), and all of the talk from our new coaches about this team being on the cusp of something really good, plus Eriksson's relationship with Karlsson....
... yeah. Yeah. I'm seeing it. I'm seeing it.
The only stumbling block is $$$. Let's see how committed we are.
Did anybody catch Crawford specifically mentionning Eriksson as one of the great swede's he's coached?
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/crawford-explains-why-he-joined-boucher-in-ottawa~868344
See 18:50 ish mark
Probably be a much better fit budget wise as wellThat would be a pretty good third line.