Damn all of you for making such compelling arguments. That's why I love it here!
I'm a stubborn one though. I really don't want to see Carle lost with no compensation. I'd rather just keep him until cap space becomes "that much" of a bigger deal.
Half the problem with Carle is the fact that he's got to babysit Sustr every time he is on the ice. People forget how bad things were on the back end that Carle was welcomed back like a conquering hero. He didn't help much but he made things better.
Carle's biggest problem is exactly what Meszaro's deal was. He is a "Robin" defenseman who needs a Batman to be the anchor of the defensive pairing. Back when he was in Philly he had guys like Pronger and Timmonen to watch his hide and Carle was able to jump in offensively more often than he does here. He had someone to mop up his mistakes. And truth be told, Coburn, Garrison and even Hedman at times all struggle to be a defensive anchor. But the offense we have was/is so good at puck retreival and possession that it limited the amount of work these guys had to do and they functioned excellently as top 4 guys. Carle is seldom put into those positions to succeed. Usually it was the Toews line and Sustr as his buddy on defense and we all cringed in fear.
If we utilize Carle to his strengths and don't ask so much of him I guarantee he would not only play better but at least one team might actually consider wanting him. He was awesome on the powerplay in Philly but then again Coop's gonna Coop when it comes to the powerplay. I'm no expert but I can promise you if Carle wasn't Sustr's babysitter he would be able to do better.
This is true.
So with today being the day we have to know who stays with the team I’m really curies about what we’ll do.
On forward I’d say we have 2 spots open on the 4th line with Boyle + possible healthy scratch and we have five forwards: Brown, Paquette, Vladdy, JAM and Angelidis, now Angelidis will be going down to the Crunch, though I don’t know if he has to clear waivers, but the rest are interesting, one will probably have to go of those four and what do you do with the three that is left, do you give one of them a full time job and split the other spot between the other two or do you split time with all three, big question.
On defense of course it’s what to do with Nesterov, Koekkoek and Witkowski, now I don’t know how has to clear waivers of them or how that looks but it’s also a big question on how it goes, though I’m guessing Koekoek will go down to gain some more experience.
Our top 9 looks to be set:
TKO
DSC
KFC
Our fourth line has Paquette and Boyle and I'm leaning towards Vladdy. That means Brown and Marchessault make the squad and there is some kind of rotation setup. Angelidis most certainly goes back down to Syracuse. He is not waivers exempt...but I doubt anyone claims him off the waiver wire. He'll report to Syracuse and resume his captain duties.
On defense its a very muddy situation. Looks like our top 6 defensive pairs are set with Heddy/Stral, Garri/Coburn, and Carle/Sustr. If it was me I'd keep Witko up here serving popcorn and both Koekkoek and Nestea are sent down to Syracuse. If Nestea makes the team - that means one of the forwards...probably Marchessault is sent through waivers. He is a PPG player in the AHL...he could get claimed by a team. He has nothing left to prove and his development time is over in the AHL. But then you create a situation where Nestea's development time is spent serving popcorn instead of playing significant minutes down in the AHL. The other possibility is that Witko is sent through waivers - doubt he gets claimed and Nestea is the 7th forward. But again...why would we want Nestea watching games instead of playing significant time down in the AHL? I bet the people down in Syracuse would be extremely happy to see Koekkoek/DeAngelo and Nesterov/Blujus playing top four down in Syracuse...that would be an excellent top four for the AHL. Some good players down in the AHL this year...Connor Brown/Kapanen/Mantha/Nurse/Fiala/Larkin/Morin/Vrana/Nylander, etc. I think this season there are more big name prospects down in the AHL than I can remember.
I think Nestea and Koekkoek get sent down and we keep everyone we currently have in the organization instead of exposing players to waivers and/or stunting their development time. Sending Nestea and Koekkoek down also pushes their due raises and CAP hits one year further into the future. We have to get rid of Carle first in order for Nestea and Koekkoek to get their shot on the big boy club.
Last edited: