bluechipbonzo
Registered User
Love Garf's quote about drafting for need...we certainly need more size up front...I smell Ritchie at 5...
Love Garf's quote about drafting for need...we certainly need more size up front...I smell Ritchie at 5...
Richie's an enticing pick; he does have the size I'm been clamoring for. However at five one of Dal Colle or Draisaitl will almost certainly be available, and that's where I believe they will go. But I love that you want them to get bigger up front; I agree 100%.
Also Dal Colle (6'2) is 3 cm's shorter than Ritchie (6'3), so Dal Colle offers elite wing skills along with size, just has to add muscle to his big frame.
I think we're going to trade back into the middle of the 1st round to select someone like Alex Tuch who offers huge size and ability who could still be on the board mid 1st round and with our extra picks we could go pick up another top prospect without having to sacrifice all our picks.
Say Draft Day Trade: Islanders 2nd round pick (35th overall), Islanders 3rd round pick (65th overall), Islanders 4th round pick (95th overall) for the Columbus 1st & 3rd round pick (16th overall & 76th overall). I just used the 2009 draft where the Islanders moved picks as to roughly what the value could be.
Would leave us with something like 2 1st's, 1 2nd, 2 3rd, 1 4th, 0 5th, 1 6th, 1 7th. So we could end up with Halak and top 1st round prospects by making a trade like above.
New 2014 NHL Mock:
1st, 5th: Michael Dal Colle (CAN), LW, Oshawa (OHL), 6'2, 179lbs.
1st, 16th (trade): Alex Tuch (USA), C/RW, Boston College (NCAA), 6'3, 216lbs.
2nd, 52th: Alex Nedeljkovic (USA), G, Plymouth (OHL), 6'0, 185lbs.
3rd, 76th (trade): Vladislav Kamenev (RUS), C, Metallurg (KHL), 6'2, 205lbs.
3rd, 77th: Juho Lammikko (FIN), LW, Ässät (Liiga), 6'2, 190lbs.
4th, 107th: Oskar Lindblom (SWE), LW/RW, Brynäs (SHL), 6'2, 187lbs.
6th, 155th: Louis Belpedio (USA), D, Miami Uni (NCAA), 5'10, 192lbs.
7th, 185th: Axel Holmström (SWE), C, Skellefteå (SHL), 6'0, 196lbs.
Loads of size and power right across the board apart from a puck moving defensemen in Belpedio.
I don't think that allows you to trade back into the first round...
As far as our pick, it's MDC or Ritchie for me. I think Garf hints as much in his latest interview- about grabbing wingers that is- and that we'll be drafting in terms of need...LD is a C who could be converted to wing, but isn't as strong a skater or nearly as physical as MDC, let alone Ritchie.
I pass on LD as we have enough puck distributors, and need shooters- LD's penchant to slow the game down is fine, but he won't get nearly the amount of time or space in the NHL as he does in junior.
Ritchie can create that space on his own, and there's not sufficient enough of a gap between his and LD's passing...and Ritchie has the NHL release and accuracy.
LD comes across as a little redundant with our three C's already set...Tavares, Strome, Nelson...I think this is what Snow is hinting at in the interview when he talks about need...and if MDC is gone, I take Ritchie.
Ritchie will be NHL ready long before Nylander or little tricky Nicky.
You are under the assumption we have European scouts. Also, Petrov will leave a sour taste in Snow's mouth. NO WAY we draft 4 Euros.
Richie's an enticing pick; he does have the size I'm been clamoring for. However at five one of Dal Colle or Draisaitl will almost certainly be available, and that's where I believe they will go. But I love that you want them to get bigger up front; I agree 100%.
You are under the assumption we have European scouts. Also, Petrov will leave a sour taste in Snow's mouth. NO WAY we draft 4 Euros.
I think I was in the deep minority hoping for Ritchie. I don't watch these guys at all but from what I hear, the main thing that separates Ritchie from MDC and Drais is the snarl factor. It seems like some don't like that or think it is not a part of today's game but I disagree. I see guys like Lucic and Simmonds who have offensive talent, but also provide a physicality and protection on the ice that a JT or Strome could surely use. In my opinion, if we could grab him later by trade and pick up a high 2nd round chip (preferably next year), great, but if nobody wants to trade I take him because from what I have seen and hear, we have NOBODY like him in the organization.
From the Isle's website.
Chief European Scout Velli-Pekka Kautonen
Scout Matti Kautto
I would guess they are both Finns, and exlains why we don't draft many Russians, only 2 since 2009 (Pedan and Kabanov). Finns typically do not like Russians very much. We've drafted 31% Euros (11 out of 35 picks) since 2009, some were playing in North America when we drafted them. 11 Euros since 2009, so about 2 a year, I guess there is a chance we pick some Euros.
I think we come to a general conclusion that we are picking MDC, Draisaitl or Ehlers assuming none of the top 3 drop.
What prospects in the 2nd round interest you other then the obvious goaltenders
Maybe, but with the new 4-year window to sign those players, it would be pretty smart to pick some Euros later in the draft. Goalies especially...
btw. is Anders Kallur their only Euro scout?
Hey, I can't be any worse than George Plimpton was (for you oldtimers). For you youngsters, he was a famous journalist who decided to attend the Detroit Lions training camp as a player, and as a skinny rookie, he took quite a beating. Wrote a book called "Paper Lion" I believe.
He then followed that up by playing goal for the Bruins I believe.
If Bennett is available at 5 you praise whatever god you believe in and sprint to the podium to read out his name., I wouldn't look to trade, just add him to our system and let him grow into a really top player for us to call on down the road.
Never say never.
What if Anaheim offers Anderson and Ottawa's first?
You take it and take either Perlini or Virtanen, whichever is left.
Never say never.
What if Anaheim offers Anderson and Ottawa's first?
You take it and take either Perlini or Virtanen, whichever is left.
I completely understand what your saying but if we are about to make our selection of the 5th pick and Bennett is still available, I would 100% select him. With Bennett, you are selecting someone who has potentially, franchise 1c level talent that you rarely get an opportunity to draft.
Even with our depth at center right now, in two or three years it might not be such a strength. Nelson might be 1st line wing, Nielsen could be gone, Strome might end up on the wing and Cizikas might end up on the wing. Point is we have no idea what we will need in a few years time so by taking the best player available, in my opinion, sets us up long term.
Of course the Isles will do the "smarter than the rest of the room" move which they love to make and trade out of the spot.
Seriously, if they don't take Bennett at that spot and you hear a loud scream coming out of Plainview-Old Bethpage area, that would be me.