Jacob
as seen on TV
- Feb 27, 2002
- 49,611
- 25,376
What happens with Fleury? The market is not that great to dump him.
If you can't trade him then you do a compliance buy out.
What happens with Fleury? The market is not that great to dump him.
SJS has said that Stalock is their guy. Pens will have to offer a much better contract than SJS.
Not all of these goalies are coming out of a good goalie program like Boston who has regularly produced good goalies. Some back ups stay back ups for a reason.
People are betting these back ups can put up as numbers as good as Fleury playing 60+ games plus play better in the playoffs. I think that is a poor bet.
Peters, Stalock, & Jones are the guys of the future for their respective teams; Pens are only getting them with a huge overpayment.
Miller wants a big contract $6 million per with term (6-7 years).
Anderson is not good, and I think the Pens trade pieces especially picks would be better spent on forwards not Reimer.
The goalie market is not good so far this offseason.
The pick of Fleury in the first round, first overall in the 2003 draft was such a waste.
The pick of Fleury in the first round, first overall in the 2003 draft was such a waste.
If you can't trade him then you do a compliance buy out.
Does anyone know at what point MAF's compliance buy out + the new goalie's contract is greater than MAF's contract?
Does anyone know at what point MAF's compliance buy out + the new goalie's contract is greater than MAF's contract?
That his contract won't be counted against the cap
$5,000,000.01
Compliance buyouts disappear from the cap entirely.
Some ufa guys,
Stalock
Peters
Miller
Some just want anyone but Fleury. Me, either find me someone better or find a better system to play in front of the one you know.
Other than Miller, I see no one who is absolutely better. Hiller is close, but you need to pay him less or you didn't help anything.
Miller?!?!? If you think Fleury is bad in the playoffs, Miller is an absolute trainwreck. Even if the money was right - which we both know it won't be - I wouldn't want him within 100 miles of the home locker room in Consol.
It's a question of timing, really. With both Maatta and Pouliot out until December/January, we may have to keep Scuderi.
Re: Niskanen, so we're going to re-sign a defenseman...who is considered the No. 1 UFA D-man on the market? This doesn't make any sense. He's going to get 6-8 years and $5-6 million/year. Somebody will give him crazy money. A good comparable for Niskanen is James Wisniewski, who signed a six-year deal at $5.5 million in 2011.
Would you give Niskanen six years, $5.5 million per? I know I wouldn't. And he'll likely get even more because Wisniewski's deal was three years ago.
There's no way it makes any sense to go after the No. 1 defenseman on the UFA market. None whatsoever.
There is no way you keep scuds on this team. Even if Maata and Pouliett don't play next year, you have Martin, Letang, Borts, Depres, Harrington, samuelson England. There is no way any one can justify keeping non-productive Scuds on this at 3.4MM. If you think his production will increase, then I will sell you any bridge in Pgh for a case of beer. This is the #1 item on the next GM's list, GET RID OF SCUDS.
I mostly agree with what you're saying but -- dude -- come on.
Maatta
Pouliot
Despres
Samuelsson
Engelland
scratch Elliott off the list. Signed with the Blues yesterday.
How about trying to sign Swedish forward Joakim Lindström who has been the best player in the swedish elite league the last few years? Kind of like how Boston picked up Carl Soderberg.
Hiller is a downgrade and is just as bad or worse in the playoffs so far.
What is worth giving up for Kesler considering that he only has one year left on his contract? No guarantee that he would sign, and his best years are past.
I mostly agree with what you're saying but -- dude -- come on.
Maatta
Pouliot
Despres
Samuelsson
Engelland
I forgot Dumulin.
Atleast we got 1 cup out of him, almost 2.