I don't like this new playoff format. It will suck if their are divisional imbalances, which happens every couple years.
Take last year for example.
First Round (Seeds are by regular season total points)
Bracket Two
#4 Regina(DIVISION WINNER) Vs #6 Kootenay (Higher wildcard)
#5 Swift Vs #7Brandon
Bracket One
#1 Edmonton (Division Winner) vs #8Prince Albert (Lesser Wildcard)
#2 Calgary Vs #3Medicine Hat
Second round
The teams within the brackets play each other.
You have the #1,#2,#3 seeds by regular season points in the same bracket. Either way Edmonton Vs Calgary or medicine hat should be a 4th round matchup and not a 2nd round matchup. I want to see the best teams in the finals, and not duking it out in round 2.
On the other side you have teams making it into the 2nd round that shouldn't be there.
Ideally you want to be the best team in a weak division... Being in a tough division will suck no matter where you finish. Round two could easily be consistently harder than round 3.
-------
I agree with you that this is a stupid set-up. Calgary (103 pts) tied for 1st in the Conference, yet they play the Hat (92 pts) who had the 3rd most points in the Conference in the first round. One of the top 3 teams in the Conference is going out in the first round. Reg, S.C., Brnd, Koot and P.A. all have less points than the Tigers yet 4 of them get easy first round opponents so 2 will automatically advance.
You said round two could easily be consistently harder than round three and I agree. Round one can also be harder than round two. It just makes no sense.
Another oddity is that a lower placed team could gain a distinct advantage. In this case that would be 6th place Kootenay. They go over to a bracket with teams that had virtually the same or less points than they did.
Reg.....85
S.C.....85
Koot....83
Brnd...77
One could easily argue that Kootenay is the best team in that bracket and would have a pretty easy route to the Eastern Conference Final. The Ice had a much tougher schedule than the other 3 teams did and are only 2 points behind Reg and Swifty. The Hat had a pretty good season finishing with 93 points in a very tough Division. The Ice only had 83 points in the same Division, yet Kootenay gets a much much easier road in the playoffs. Like I said earlier, it just makes no sense.
You could literally see one of the top teams with 80-85 points tanking to drop from say 3rd to 6th or 7th or some such scenario.
Here is another example from the 2012-13 season:
3rd Calgary Hitmen 72 46 21 1 4 97
4th Red Deer Rebels 72 39 26 5 2 85
5th Prince Albert Raiders 72 37 28 3 4 81
Under the old system, Red Deer would have had home ice advantage and played a fairly weak Prince Albert team. With the new system, the Rebels would lose home ice and have to play a much better Calgary team.
I also checked back and in 2011-12 and the Hat had the same scenario as Red Deer above:
3rd Calgary Hitmen .... 72 44 25 2 1 91
4th Medicine Hat Tigers 72 42 24 2 4 90
5th Saskatoon Blades .. 72 40 29 1 2 83
In 2010-11 it was the Ice getting screwed again:
3rd Medicine Hat Tigers 72 46 18 4 4 100
4th Kootenay Ice ........ 72 46 21 1 4 97
5th Moose Jaw Warriors 72 40 26 2 4 86
Four things to take from this:
#1 This new system is moronic and then some.
#2 The Central Division has been much stronger than the Eastern Division for many years.
#3 I don't know if this one is just bad luck or some kind of mathematical certainty. In EVERY ONE OF THE 5 SCENARIOS presented here....the 4th place team gets screwed over.
#4 The Hurricanes don't show up anywhere in this post as we are talking PLAYOFF HOCKEY!!!
.
.