Hottubber
Registered User
- Feb 9, 2010
- 2,713
- 77
I addressed that but saying pretty much the same.
I can't ever see a healthy player retiring with term still remaining on his contract.
Marcus Naslund did. He had 1 year and 5 or 6 mil left
I addressed that but saying pretty much the same.
I can't ever see a healthy player retiring with term still remaining on his contract.
If they are discussing that trade possibility, I just hope they don't get gun shy about the very very remote possibility they meet in the Finals.
The deal was under the assumption that LA wouldn't do Martin for Williams. And how is trading for Hudler making us smaller while trading for Williams doesn't? They're both similar sizes, with Hudler being like 3 inches smaller and similar weight.
Marcus Naslund did. He had 1 year and 5 or 6 mil left
Marcus Naslund did. He had 1 year and 5 or 6 mil left
I addressed that but saying pretty much the same.
I can't ever see a healthy player retiring with term still remaining on his contract.
He had also made significantly more money than Scuderi has over his career. This is only Scuderi's 2nd quality contract, and him giving up 5m (or 3.3m) would have a much larger impact (depending on how he lives) then Naslund giving up 5/6m.
His contract with LA was 4 years ~14m. Then there's this one, which was what... 12m? I don't think he made more than ~1m a contract prior to that. Him walking away from 5m would be huge.
My ideal scenario on the back end is moving both Martin and Scuds(combined 8.375M caphit) and bringing in a guy like Sekera (2.75M)
That leaves 5.625M for the forward coming in. Throw Spaling or Kunitz in any deals and its 7.85-9.475M.
Kunitz is becoming a moveable piece more and more for me cuz, for example, say you land another top 6 winger. That means Comeau or Bennett can move down where Kunitz is slotted right now on the 3rd line.
Completely agree. There is no way he is walking away from the contract. I also think he is tradable, which I know isn't a popular belief on this board
Considering the rumored price for Sekera (1st+good prospect), I'll pass.
I guess it comes down to value and the perspective you are sitting at.
If we lose Martin at the end of the year for nothing, there's literally ZERO value in that. To go even further, if he keeps up his CURRENT level of play (read: crap, and not what he is so very capable of), Id say he offers equal value to getting even just a 2nd round pic.
If one believes that Martin can turn around his level of play and play like he did last season, then sure, he offers a ton of value. He played some lights out hockey last season.
But right now? Meh. With the way he's playing, I dont see much of a difference between him and Harrington/Despres. At all. So might as well trade him and turn that into something that can help the team more than he currently is .. which is not much.
I'd really like to see somebody calculate the # of mistakes Despres makes per game over lets say... a 20 game sample, compared to Martin. Obviously it would be purely subjective based on the person calculating those mistakes, but I think people tend to see "veteran" and just assume they mess up less than somebody who's "young" without actually having any concrete facts to back that statement up.
I'd do it myself, but I don't have that kind of patience.
Does anyone know of a new site similar to capgeek? I was going to try and calculate a lineup but I'm not sure if we could fit it in under the cap. Would this work?
Martin+Spaling for Williams
Dumoulin+2nd for Tlusty
Perron Sid Hornqvist
Tlusty Geno Williams
Kunitz Sutter Bennett
Comeau Goc Downie
Letang Harrington
Erhoff Maatta
Scuderi(bleh) Despres
At this point with the log jam on the blueline, his unmovable contract, and his rancid play the best thing for the Pens might be for Scuderi to just retire after this season. I'm not worried anymore about trying to offload him for a bag of pucks. I just want to see him off the roster and the cap.
I know he'll never retired and forgo the rest of his contract, but I can always hope.
Probably the worst contract in the team's history.
Why not get rid of Sill also, he's even worse!Why not just dump Adams and recall Farnham? We don't need an enforcer that can't play hockey on this team.
Why not get rid of Sill also, he's even worse!
It's a 35+ contract so even if he retires we still have to keep his cap hit (IIRC, can't check on capgeek).
what does sill do worse than adams. this is ridiculous that people really think he's worse than adams
It's a 35+ contract so even if he retires we still have to keep his cap hit (IIRC, can't check on capgeek).
You might be right, but I recall being relived that I saw on CapGeek that is wasn't listed as 35+. I might be wrong.
It's amazing how much information was derived from that glorious site. It will be missed greatly.
You might be right, but I recall being relived that I saw on CapGeek that is wasn't listed as 35+. I might be wrong.
It's amazing how much information was derived from that glorious site. It will be missed greatly.
Agreed. But guaranteed that someone will take it back up. Might not have ALL the features CG did, but it will have many of them.
Yes. You're moving out 7.7m in salary, and bring back something very similar (~6.5-7m in JW/Tlusty).
If I had the proper programming skills I would definitely try.
Hopefully someone does, maybe even get it started via KickStarter so I can contribute and get access to the ultra secret "Insider ArmChair GM" function
pretending to work out