Jurco checks. Glendening checks. Helm checks. Tatar seems to never pass up a chance to hit someone.
Jurco checks. Glendening checks. Helm checks. Tatar seems to never pass up a chance to hit someone.
Tatar is our version of Gallagher in Montreal. They play a very similar style and whille Tatar is 3 inches taller, they are similarly built.
As Don Cherry said last night of Gallagher, "See that right there, those are the guys that you win with."
Something tells me that Don won't have the same words regarding Tatar.
But yeah there's definitely a lot of similarities between the two players. I think Tatar has more skill with the puck, while Gallagher, pound for pound, goes to the net harder than anyone in the NHL from what I've seen.
This is the way you do it, really?
What about, oh:
Abdelkader-Datsyuk-Alfredsson
Franzen-Legwand-Nyquist
Jurco-Sheahan-Tatar
Miller-Helm-Glendening
The lines yesterday gave us a chance as well. Chara, as good as he is, can be beaten with speed and quickness.
And Franzen is just a joke right now so whatever.
Jurco checks. Glendening checks. Helm checks. Tatar seems to never pass up a chance to hit someone.
Abdelkader has improved, but his physicality has always been ridiculously overrated.
If this is a reply to what I posted, which of those players are you proposing to put with Datsyuk on the top line?
Those are actually the exact lines I would go with if it was my call. Abdelkader is still with Datsyuk there, which is what everyone here seems to be *****ing about.
Don't know why Miller-Helm would ever be split up
Well it was a two fold reply.
You claimed no one on this team hits regularly. I don't think that's true.
As for replacing Abby, I'd be fine with Jurco on the top line with Datsyuk. He's fast, skilled, physical. He produces at a better rate than Abby as well. Abby's skillset is not only better suited to the 3/4 line, he would better perform there. He has the ability to win those matchups, but he doesn't really have the ability to win the matchups against top lines. The IQ isn't there.
Personally I think Legwand and Abby could be switched. Abby can play that shutdown role, he has center experience. Abby has done PK work before he knows the defensive side of the game.
I think Babcock is more worried about the physical matchups. I think he believes Datsyuk and Nyquist (or whomever) can product the offense, Abdelkader can create havoc in front of the net and win board battles.
I don't really like Abdelkader there but I also like to have added dimensions to every line.
I find this much more convincing than the physicality aspect. Splitting up Datsyuk and Nyquist for that reason makes a bit of sense.
But you can still split them up without putting Abby on the first line.
He has more assists this year, but, his goal scoring this season hasn't increased in any statistically significant manner. This is in spite of playing with top level talent.
To be perfectly honest, we've had this Datsyuk debate for virtually every line he's on without Zetterberg. Datsyuk and Shanahan? Doesn't work. Datsyuk and Franzen? Doesn't work. Datsyuk and Hossa? Doesn't work. Keep in mind, all of those guys did score 30+ goals at one point, but people still complained about it.
I'll never advocate for Abdelkader on that line, but I don't think he's ever been _THE_ issue. He just doesn't help out offensively enough.
This is the most Canadian thing I've ever heard.
but other than that those young players have done a good job even if the [Dan] Clearys and the [Todd] Bertuzzis are question marks in the lineup. They’ve got a pretty good lineup with a lot of choices. That’s how I look at it.”
Datsyuk and Filppula? Worked, but Babcock would never keep them together.
Datsyuk, Hudler, and Cleary in 10-11? Worked, but Babcock split them up after 2 or 3 weeks.
What made Datsyuk and Hossa so frustrating was:
1) Franzen-Datsyuk-Holmstrom was by far the best line we iced that season. Yet, just prior to the playoffs, guess what, Babcock broke it up.
Why? Because Z and Hossa were awful together. So instead of trying something like, oh I don't know:
Datsyuk-Z-Holmstrom (which we all know worked)
Franzen-Filppula-Hossa
Babcock insisted on putting Hossa with Datsyuk.
Then the other problem is that Babcock sticks players past their prime with Datsyuk. Holmstrom and Bertuzzi did work very well with Datsyuk. But when they're hardly even effective enough to be in the lineup, then they shouldn't be playing in the top 6.
There's been a lot of combos that have worked with Datsyuk. Babcock always goes back to the same crap though in short time. That's why we complain.
I just find it interesting that Datsyuk seems to be the one that these issues always fall on. I understand it's probably a playstyle thing, since everyone seems to work with Z. I can't remember one time seeing someone 'get going' on a line with Datsyuk. Maybe Filppula is the only one it happened with.
I just find it interesting that Datsyuk seems to be the one that these issues always fall on. I understand it's probably a playstyle thing, since everyone seems to work with Z. I can't remember one time seeing someone 'get going' on a line with Datsyuk. Maybe Filppula is the only one it happened with.
Seemed to work well with Homer. We all know he did well with Hull.
Who did Hossa play most with in 2009? He did reach 40 goals... I know he played at least some of it with Datsyuk.