Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,325
- 49,976
Amazing set of wheels on that boy. Hard to say who will be there.If we can somehow get Broberg...
Amazing set of wheels on that boy. Hard to say who will be there.If we can somehow get Broberg...
Never in our history have we taken on bad contracts to accrue picks or move up in the draft. I can't imagine we are going to start now.
I agree. This is not the type of draft to try and move up. Moving down makes more sense though I suspect it will turn out to be neither.I would seriously consider the opposite. I would contemplate moving back and trying to get another 2nd plus. There are quite a number of good players in the late first to second round range. Just watching the draft rankings I have seen quite a lot of shifting of players going from 2nd round to 1st and 1st to 2nd round. Many of the draft ranking organizations have different rankings where some first rounders are in the second round or vice versa. We could end up with 4 or 5 picks in the top 60 and it us possible that a number of them turn out better than some players that get drafted in the teens
If we can somehow get Broberg...
Philip Broberg Scouting Report: 2019 NHL Draft #9 - Last Word on HockeyI don't think he's that good. Great skill and size but don't think he has the hockey sense to be a star.
Never in our history have we taken on bad contracts to accrue picks or move up in the draft. I can't imagine we are going to start now.
We have 45th overall not 57th.I'm almost certain that we move up higher than 19th. We have the 32 + 57 OV picks to dangle around for that to happen. Also some players if any teams would want them (Ryan, Boedker, Smith, Harpur, etc.), and maybe even a prospect like Chlapik can be packaged.
Considering the amount of depth our prospect pool has now (just look at the projected top 15 U-25 players poll that XSpyrit has going on if you doubt me), I wouldn't be against trading 19 + 32 to move up and get a top-15 talent.
If you consider the history of pick trades, we can move pretty close to the top 10 with that type of package imo...
ha, i thought it was 44 we hadWe have 45th overall not 57th.
Draft best player available regardless of position lw/rw/c/ld/rd/g
We have 45th overall not 57th.
This site has us picking 57th not 45th. Not sure what's right any more?
2019 NHL Mock Draft - NHL - DraftSite.com
That's wrong, not sure how Detroit would get that pickThis site has us picking 57th not 45th. Not sure what's right any more?
2019 NHL Mock Draft - NHL - DraftSite.com
Of course we read this every yr that every team takes the BPA & GMs will tell us that they picked who their scouts thought was the best player available. However, who determines who the BPA is wherever a team is ranked to pick when so many of these players are ranked so differently depending on the site you like or even every team could have different ranking of players from each other & these sites. We can see from our polls of who our best prospects are that it ranges with people who they think is the better player.
I'm of the opinion that when you have two players or more who are ranked fairly close to each other & the scouting staff can also be divided as to who is the better player is that drafting for need isn't always a bad thing in this circumstance. For example, if half the scouts like the LWer & half the scouts like the RWer & that is an org need, who do you pick?
This site has us picking 57th not 45th. Not sure what's right any more?
2019 NHL Mock Draft - NHL - DraftSite.com