Tkachuk27
Registered User
- Nov 30, 2011
- 1,452
- 96
Will OTT look at a D-men like York or a sniper like Caufield.
Post the player you want at 19
Post the player you want at 19
Then use the 32 and something to move that one in to the 1st round for a total of 2 first rounders.No one. Use this pick plus another one to move up.
Wouldn't take York or Caulfield.
Newhook
Seider
Lavoie
Heinola
Grab one of those guys and we did well for ourselves at 19.
I’ve never seen him play but Caulfield has me intrigued because of his ability to put the puck in the net and the comparisons to Debrincat.
What don’t you like about his game?
IMO Foote will be available in the 2nd roundSkill and compete level - Nolan Foote is interesting because the Sens like their pedigree players and he seems like a guy who can cement a 3rd line.
At this point we need top end skill, but I’d rather have a Chris Kelly who cements a 3rd line and is an elite 3rd line player then have a tweener 2nd like player who can’t think the game fast,
Basically I’d rather we take Chris Kelly over Mike Hoffman if those are the options at 19
As someone with their own reservations about Caufield maybe I can step in on this one.
The kid is the definition of one-trick pony. The comparisons to DeBrincat make sense because of the size and shooting ability, but that's where they end, imo. DeBrincat has much better vision and creativity, ultimately making him a (much, imo) better playmaker than Caufield.
Caufield is putting sgnificant (historic even) goal scoring numbers with USNTDP, and obviously goal scoring is the the most important part of the game. He doesn't seem like a guy that will ever be able to do much away from the puck and with his lack of playmaking risks being someone that can be shutdown at the NHL level.
To me, he's probably the most boom/bust guy in the first couple rounds of this draft. The goalscoring upside is obviously enticing, but if that doesn't translate to the next level he's a guy that will have a hard time carving out a role for himself.
Thanks for the detailed response. I think this draft is too important for us to gamble on a 1 dimensional goal scorer in the first round. If he ends up falling to the second, I wouldn’t mind rolling the dice on him then.
No one. Use this pick plus another one to move up.
Draft skill in the first round and let our scouts handle the later rounds.
I wonder if we'll be able to trade up via taking on bad contracts.
We have some flexibility with those 2nd round picks, both this year, and the future ones. It means if taking on a contract isn't enough, we have other stuff we can throw in.
Florida @ 13 seems like an obvious target to me. There are rumours Luongo will consider LTIRetirement. Luongo is only owed an average of about 1 million per season against a 4.5M LTIRetirement cap hit. FLA might have incentive to move that LTIR cap hit if they do intend to go after Panarin and Bobrovsky.
It's not yet been reported if Luongo is insured, but even so, 1 million against 4.5 million is not very much to pay. It also might help us either hit the floor, or create a buffer above the floor so that the floor doesn't prevent us from making in season deals.
Kesler is rumoured to be LTIRetiring. If he is insured, there's another target at 9th overall. LAK at 5 with Phaneuf and possibly Kovalchuk (if he decides to go back to the KHL, 35+ contract), and DET at 6 with Zetterberg+Franzen are also targets.
Florida seems like the most obvious one to me though. They have clear incentive to make the move. 13 down to 18 isn't all that unrealistic of a drop. I'd hope that if we get up to 13, maybe we can swing to a higher pick from there.