GDT: 11/24/17

[bukwas]

Off the post and out through the 5 hole.

 

[bukwas]

This review is taking forever.

 

[PatriceBergeronFan]

This shouldn't even be reviewable. The whistle blew and Crosby speared Khudobin to even put the puck in.

 

[The Zetterberg Era]

Wow is that ridiculous...

It is hard to say Crosby doesn't have a different standard when he can do things like score after the whistle and have it count.

Heads up by Crosby to keep playing through and after the whistle. I guess the rulebook doesn't matter.

 

[CK17]

I'm shocked they call it a goal. I think it was one, but the intent to blow the whistle seemed to be there.

 

[Dbrownss]

Refs are always to quick to blow the whistle.

 

[BruinsFan1990]

Its Crosby. Of course they are giving him the goal.

 

[PatriceBergeronFan]

The definition of the NHL catering to Crosby. Utterly embarrassing look for the NHL here. Utter buffoonery by the officials.

You can't unwhistle a play undead.

 

[GarbageGoal]

lololololololol....

Boston's Chris Rooney made that call so as not to appear biased. He's predictable.

 

[ColbyChaos]

How did that even stand

 

[Emerz]

What? The whistle blew before the puck was in the net

I don't get it.

 

[Fatty McLardy]

the whistle blew after the puck went into net, but when is the intent to blow the whistle...

 

[oobga]

Saying it "entered the goal legally" totally ignores the actual concern on the play. Whistle went before the puck was in from what I can see.

New ref tool just created? "Intent to not blow the whistle after seeing the replay"?

 

[Sheppy]

It’s the Penguins, of course that counted.

 

[Fatty McLardy]

How did that even stand

Do you even have to ask, Crosby has bit of a double standard from Bettman.

 

[Rasmus CacOlainen]

Im neutral and I say that was a good goal.

 

[Jyrki Lumme]

Meh, that's a good goal. If you're going to accuse the refs of being bad for calling that a goal, you have just as much right to accuse the refs of being bad for calling the play dead when it shouldn't have been.

You can't get mad when the right call was made.

 

[SladeWilson23]

I'm incredibly confused.

 

[Glove Malfunction]

Whistle blew. the rules say you literally can't review that. But of course...Crosby.

 

[Shockmaster]

The definition of the NHL catering to Crosby. Utterly embarrassing look for the NHL here. Utter buffoonery by the officials.

You can't unwhistle a play undead.

Yup, the NHL sure caters to him by allowing other players to crosscheck him in the head.

 

[GarbageGoal]

"Forget it Jake, it's Pittsburgh".

 

[Glove Malfunction]

Meh, that's a good goal. If you're going to accuse the refs of being bad for calling that a goal, you have just as much right to accuse the refs of being bad for calling the play dead when it shouldn't have been.

Quick or not, the whistle kills the play. Not even reviewable.

 

[Empoleon8771]

I think it's extremely difficult to tell whether that puck went in before or after the whistle, because the puck was already moving towards the net when the whistle blew. I think saying it was inconclusive and just going with the call on the ice would be the right call.

Everyone better get your tinfoil hats, though! All just a conspiracy. It's funny that people are crying conspiracy when we're talking about a game where the Bruins are playing in, though.

 

[Jyrki Lumme]

Quick or not, the whistle kills the play. Not even reviewable.

A good goal was counted as a goal. That's better than a good goal not counting because the ref is makes a mistake.

 

[Fatty McLardy]

Bruins are trash though, how the f*** do you let it 3-3 while only allowing 10 shots....