imagine Nylander + Pastrnak + Tkachuk
instead of Juolevi + Gudbranson/McCann + Virtanen
And that was possible if the hype on Benning being a good scout was true.
Boston, Toronto and Calgary would decline all 3 players for one of theirs
While two of those players (Nylander and Tkachuk) were my preference as well, one does not need to draft the best player at every pick in every draft to merit the distinction of "a good scout". A draft that produces ONE quality core NHLer is a successful draft, particularly by Canucks historical standards. And it is way, way too early to close the door on players like Juolevi and Virtanen.
OT: Quite the game against a wretched opponent. Instead of wondering if the team will continue to be too competitive to truly tank under the watchful eyes of the Sedins, perhaps we should be asking if the team will be too competitive to tank under future captain Bo Horvat. Wasn't it Bo tank-buster Horvat who was on fire through the entire back half last year, stealing us points left and right? I believe it was. And I guess that's where part of me still wants the team trying (and succeeding) at winning sometimes. I don't want Bo's competitive fires quenched by pathological losing.
Nice to see Baertschi finally peeling the monkey off his back as well.
It's odd, because no matter which way the team swings, I'm both winning (either the Nucks are playing well
or the team is sinking to a higher draft pick and possible regime change
)
and losing (the team is playing poorly
or rising to a mediocre draft pick
).