First off, I never said you suggested a one for one. I highlighted Seider and Trouba because the difference in value between Zadina and Kakko is so negligible currently that you apparently think the Seider/Trouba value is close. It isn’t. The difference in Kakko and Zadina isn’t even remotely close to getting Detroit to take Trouba’s unmoveable contract off your hands AND give you Seider.
More importantly, you really don’t seem to get that Yzerman isn’t trading away top prospects for lesser pieces, because you were saying this same ridiculous stuff last year, when you suggested Seider+ for a package highlighted by Chytil and Deangelo.
The GMs who rebuild like that don’t last long as GMs.
"I highlighted Seider and Trouba because the difference in value between Zadina and Kakko is so negligible currently that you apparently think the Seider/Trouba value is close."
I took pains to clarify that is not the valuation.
Zadina is not key to NYR. We have enough Ws. We don't need and don't particularly want him.
YOU want to make it about a Seider:Trouba 1:1, and I never went there.
Trouba has rebounded very nicely now that he is not playing w/Staal/Smith and has a good complimentary partner in K'A Miller. He remains overpriced 1-1.5 per. He is not worth Seider, but he is not worthless. The idea was always to make a package. Prior to Nils L and Schneider arriving, it was nec to get Seider in the return. Now, not so much. However,
the correct dynamic is Seider and Kakko, not any other.
NY continues not to want to trade KK.
But IF IF IF IF we were, Seider would be included.
Again, this is hypothetical as a courtesy to the OP who was set on seeing if KK could be pried away.
No. And as I correctly surmised, put KK w/Panarin and great results have followed.
The other shoe will drop when Kravtsov, who is being broken in slowly w/less responsibilities at W, is made the C of that line.
To be clear we are keeping KK and you are keeping MS
--------
"More importantly, you really don’t seem to get that Yzerman isn’t trading away top prospects for lesser pieces, because you were saying this same ridiculous stuff last year, when you suggested Seider+ for a package highlighted by Chytil and Deangelo."
Let's not be disingenuous here.
You develop as slowly as it takes, or you consider moves that add more talent more quickly.
After initially holding out Chytil, I
then reluctantly included him as DET wanted solid C add.
Now, given add of Nils L and Schneider, would not do that deal.
I was correct about emergence of Chytil as 2C with further potential.
Deangleo is obv a prob for non hockey reasons, which no one could foresee, certainly to degree as it unfolded. However, at the time, his production at RD, which improved last season, was signif.
Had that deal gone down:
Chytil - 2C behind Larkin w/1C potential production
Trouba + Deangelo adding a quality RD = net of 1 after Seider subtracted
plus other assets
for
Seider +.
This would have been a net plus for Wings and by adding more desired quality bodies factually would have speed up development. Deangelo might still have been a clusterfk waiting to happen, or dif environment, might never have blown up. We will never know.
The counter argument to that is Seider may be not just a highly productive player, he may be a star, and DET can't afford to pass up and deal a star b'c they are hard to acquire.
That is a fair argument. Neither that nor the counter argument are prevailing, they are 2 sides of the same coin.
Seider currently may be viewed as Hedman lite. How lite remains to be seen.
We will see what happens when he gets here, which looks good.
As for Trouba, NY will be able to move him --- something not predicated on his performance as much as emerging Schneider replacing him --- in 3 years at most.
Schneider likely ready before and to what extent Trouba sees the writing on the wall and waives before remains to be seen.
Would have been nice to accommodate him to DET if possible, but things are what they are.
This would not be a conv, btw, if NYR would have listened to my dictum that going forward NO NMCs ever for anybody. Period.
Extensive NTCs sufficiently adequate.