original islander
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2011
- 1,254
- 21
Wasn't that goal in the daytime... that year was surreal for hockey with the Olympic win and then Isles win... remember that game being a day game
Yes. It was a Saturday afternoon.
Wasn't that goal in the daytime... that year was surreal for hockey with the Olympic win and then Isles win... remember that game being a day game
all three times i've been to barclays center
1. Gretzky's hat trick in final game of 84 Stanley cup - I cried myself to sleep.
2. LaFontaine getting traded - heartbreaking
3. Rags sweep in 94 playoff series
* Milbury tenure - too much to choose during this dark time - Berard trade for Potvin, Spano era, Millstein era- trading Palfy and others for picks, luongo trade and dipietro pick, the list goes on...
I can do you one better. I did the same thing but our building in Queens didn't get hooked up to cable until 1993! So I watched what I could on channel 9 and WHT and the rest I would listen to on my radio. Not only that but I would record the games on tape cassette and play them back listening to the highlights.
Here's my top 3 (and I cheated to fit 5 into 3):
1. McDonald's OT goal in '78;
2. Losing to NYR in '79 and '94;
3. off-ice shockers: Spano and hiring the backup goalie to be GM.
BTW, #1 is by far the worst I've ever felt as a result of a sporting event. And I was an Oakland Raiders fan as a kid and watched on TV as victory turned to defeat via the Immaculate Reception. Sorta related, I was at the final game when the Flyers lost to Chicago in OT (when Kane snuck the puck past Leighton and no one knew that he had just scored the Cup-winner). That was the most surreal moment ever - the confusion, silence and then slow realization by 20,000 people was crazy.
There's been more bad than good, hasn't there?
I was alittle too young for the 78-79 stings with Mcdonald and the raggies. The 1st cup I was 9 and alittle too cocky (lol) thought they would never lose. compound that with the fact USA beat the Soviets and my world was nothing but winning.
strutted around with my Brent Sutter Jersey playing roller hockey all day..
Mine...well. Here is two:
Losing to Rangers (1979?) playoff series.
Diehard fan since beginning. Was at first game in 1972...then joined USAF in 1980 until 1985 and I was overseas missing the entire dynasty.
Wonder if the USAF takes old guys back. Maybe I jinxed my team!
That is a very good question
19 playoff series wins in a row
4 straight Stanley cups
5 straight conference winners
From 94-to the present has really helped off set the Dynasty years
The Milbury- Spano-Millstein period almost sunk this team for good.
I guess I can see why 1979 hurts, but how come nobody is bringing up 1994? That year we played the Rags in the playoffs after an encouraging 93' run. We got swept by the Rags, and I think we lost two of the games 6-0. Ron Hextall was an absolute sieve. That playoff series is probably the worst ever in franchise history and to make matters worse the Rags went on to break our favorite chant. So in my opinion that is way worse than 79. WAAAAY WORSE!
I guess I can see why 1979 hurts, but how come nobody is bringing up 1994? That year we played the Rags in the playoffs after an encouraging 93' run. We got swept by the Rags, and I think we lost two of the games 6-0. Ron Hextall was an absolute sieve. That playoff series is probably the worst ever in franchise history and to make matters worse the Rags went on to break our favorite chant. So in my opinion that is way worse than 79. WAAAAY WORSE!
'94 was bad, but I think the difference is that we expected to win in '79 and were hoping to win the Cup. The Isles had the best record in the league that year. Getting knocked out in the semis by the Ooh-la-la Rangers of Espo and Duguay was the pits.
Just to expand on my previous post, younger fans may not realize that by '79 the Isles had a reputation as chokers, and the NYR fans loved to push that narrative. Starting in '75, the Isles lost in the semifinals 4 times and quarterfinals 1 time (the Toronto OT loss on McDonald's goal the year before, in '78). So losing to the NYR in '79 after having the best record in the league was really bad.
People don't talk about this, but in the stands (no message boards back then!) there were plenty of people calling for the heads of Torrey and Arbour, and looking to trade guys like Nystrom. Ironically, the next year the Isles finished with 25 less points in the regular season and won the Cup.
Yeah, i'm definitely too young for it. Not to mention I didn't become a passionate hockey fan until 11 or 12, just after the dynasty years. I haven't really done enough to study the history of the Isles. I didn't realize they became that good, that quickly. Guess it makes sense though, you need to lose a series like that to prepare yourself to win a cup. So actually 79 could be viewed as a catapult and not a let down. Remember what Gretzky said in his book about learning to be Stanley Cup champions by losing to the Isles.
I guess 94 was such a let down for me personally because gut says the Isles 93' run was a Cinderella story and a one hit wonder but I didn't want to believe it. 94 kind of forced that as reality. In context now I can see why 79' was so brutal. I didn't know about the rep and nuances like that. It's interesting to learn.