Daley Tarasenkshow
Schennsational
Hi everyone- is McWard expected to make the NHL team or play in the AHL? He's a local guy so I'm really looking forward to tracking his career!
AHL is very likely.Hi everyone- is McWard expected to make the NHL team or play in the AHL? He's a local guy so I'm really looking forward to tracking his career!
I wonder if Hirose will be the Hronek's partner by end of the season and we see Soucey anchoring a pair with like somebody/anyone else not Myers.AHL is very likely.
i don't think both hirose and wolanin make the lineup to start the season because there's a lot of overlap there.
he looked limited with his puck skills and overall in need of pro experience. he's also a bit younger for a college FA so i think that they'll want to get him reps in the AHL
even if we would benefit from his size in the lineup, you would assume juulsen and brisebois slot higher in the depth chart. especially juulsen.
I don't want to say that i'm down on Hirose, but I will say i lean in the "i'll believe it when i see it" line of thinking with him. His skating on retrievals and those high speed rushes looked off. He also wasn't overly strong in his own end. Wolanin is dog shit in front of his own net and lacks physicality but the skating is way betterI wonder if Hirose will be the Hronek's partner by end of the season and we see Soucey anchoring a pair with like somebody/anyone else not Myers.
absolutely fair take, prospects are fickle.I don't want to say that i'm down on Hirose, but I will say i lean in the "i'll believe it when i see it" line of thinking with him. His skating on retrievals and those high speed rushes looked off. He also wasn't overly strong in his own end. Wolanin is dog shit in front of his own net and lacks physicality but he doesn't get struggle with the physicality aspect.
I don't want to say that i'm down on Hirose, but I will say i lean in the "i'll believe it when i see it" line of thinking with him. His skating on retrievals and those high speed rushes looked off. He also wasn't overly strong in his own end. Wolanin is dog shit in front of his own net and lacks physicality but he doesn't get struggle with the physicality aspect.
the end of the paragraph my adhd brain took over so i edited it to make sense but yeah overall gist remains the sameabsolutely fair take, prospects are fickle.
ummm no.. Ratbone is bad at defending period. Hirose's issue is strength but his defending is lightyears ahead of Ratbone.hirose is a very polished puck mover but he's got almost all the same issues as rathbone. i think he'll need some ahl time at the very least
hirose is a very polished puck mover but he's got almost all the same issues as rathbone. i think he'll need some ahl time at the very least
Thats an odd take..Hirose is positionally sound, and generally calm with the puck.i meant in a more general sense not that he's exactly the same player as rathbone. bottom line is coaches aren't going to trust hirose given his current level of play in his own end
i meant in a more general sense not that he's exactly the same player as rathbone. bottom line is coaches aren't going to trust hirose given his current level of play in his own end
I think the primary difference is hockey sense.hirose is a very polished puck mover but he's got almost all the same issues as rathbone. i think he'll need some ahl time at the very least
Hirose doesn’t get as rattled as Rathbone does when pressured, big difference. Very smart player.hirose is a very polished puck mover but he's got almost all the same issues as rathbone. i think he'll need some ahl time at the very least
A total of nine periods played over three days, plus a five minute OT, and I'd say the Canucks dominated seven of them and the OT against Winnipeg.
Probably the best team they've ever sent to the Young-stars tournament. Although given the number of players in their lineup with pro experience, the roster might have been a little unfair.
I know the Canucks prospect pool doesn't get high grades from most of the prospect sites, because the perception is that it's lacking in high-end talent. But in terms of 'depth' you can't argue that the Canucks have some very interesting prospects 23 and under.
Despite all the first and second rounders given up over the last three seasons, Allvin has done a nice job of infilling the prospect pool via NCAA and Swedish signings.
Do the Canucks quietly have the deepest under 23 prospect group in the league?
Sounds like a great topic for the main boards!!!
I don't actually believe it. I was just poking fun at this beauty that showed up last season on the main boards.I say no. Technically Hirose, McDonaugh, Sasson, Johansson, Plasek, and Tolopilo are over 23. We definitely sent an older and more experienced group.