Whoops, my bad. But yeah, it's also on sale on the xbox marketplace or whatever it's called.I unfortunately own it for Xbox One. Appreciate the recommendation though
Whoops, my bad. But yeah, it's also on sale on the xbox marketplace or whatever it's called.I unfortunately own it for Xbox One. Appreciate the recommendation though
Witcher 2 was my first Witcher game. Never played the first. It was solid but those criticisms (and then some) are entirely valid. It's merely a good, but not great RPG. It's not very long and you can really only get two replays out of it before you've seen everything.
Witcher 3 was a game that grew on me immensely. When it first came out, I wasn't very enamoured with it and I couldn't really get into it. Replayed it this summer and I found it absolutely brilliant. I definitely enjoyed DA:I more at release than I did W3, but I think I'd change my mind on that now.
You get to answer the questions again.Question: Am I able to select different responses to the questions relating to Witcher 2 in the NG+ of Witcher 3 or am I locked into the answers I gave the first playthrough? Or do I have to start a brand new file?
Now that I have played TW2 I want my replay of 3 to reflect those choices.
Whoops, my bad. But yeah, it's also on sale on the xbox marketplace or whatever it's called.
Finally beat Blood and Wine. The ending was far more drawn out and complex then I had been expecting. It reminded me of the end of Lord of the Rings in that there is a substantial wind down after the climactic fight.
Going to go for a NG+ now. I want to go the Triss route this time around to see that side of the story, but I feel as if Yennifer is who the game is designed for Geralt to be with. So I dont know which way Ill go.
I agree with you here. I'm on my second full play through of W3 and just got past this; went with Yen again... if you go Triss (or anyone reading the thread did), is there anything worth/major different in the game with that decision? Did it feel wrong as you played through the rest of the game?Finally beat Blood and Wine. The ending was far more drawn out and complex then I had been expecting. It reminded me of the end of Lord of the Rings in that there is a substantial wind down after the climactic fight.
Going to go for a NG+ now. I want to go the Triss route this time around to see that side of the story, but I feel as if Yennifer is who the game is designed for Geralt to be with. So I dont know which way Ill go.
IIRC the devs said since it draws a bit from the novels, the game is meant to push you towards Yen (ew, btw)
I just started playing it for the first time since i finally caved into the insane amount of praise the game gets, and because the GOTY edition was on sale digitally.
I love it so far. Took me a bit of getting used to given i prefer more...simple RPGs, i guess? (stuff like Mass Effect, Mario RPGs, etc) But now that i'm through White Orchid i feel settled in.
...Just not sure i can actually survive the whole 80-100 hours. Especially when Monster Hunter is due out in just under a month.
IIRC the devs said since it draws a bit from the novels, the game is meant to push you towards Yen (ew, btw)
I just started playing it for the first time since i finally caved into the insane amount of praise the game gets, and because the GOTY edition was on sale digitally.
I love it so far. Took me a bit of getting used to given i prefer more...simple RPGs, i guess? (stuff like Mass Effect, Mario RPGs, etc) But now that i'm through White Orchid i feel settled in.
...Just not sure i can actually survive the whole 80-100 hours. Especially when Monster Hunter is due out in just under a month.
I will say one of the things I love about this game is that it is, for the most part, clear on what are main quests, what are secondary quests that play off of the main quest and have an effect on the world, and what is pretty much fluff. I was able to avoid most of the fluff and just play the "good" stuff (in my mind at least), and it took about 50 hours.
But I'm sort of an anti-completionist when it comes to open world RPGs, so it depends on your play style.
If I were to do another playthrough of TW3, I think I'd skip all of the ? and treasure hunts (except maybe the witcher gear that I may actually want) and just focus on quests that have a story attached. I'm sure you can easily cut off 20+ hours by doing this.
I hit all the ones on land because I loved the discovery, but the water ones got to be too obnoxious.The fluff you speak of i assume the giant sea of unmarked locations?
I hit all the ones on land because I loved the discovery, but the water ones got to be too obnoxious.
Definitely. When I re-joined the PC gaming community last year, the only 2 mods I installed for this game are fast travel from any where and rich merchants. Both are a little cheat-y so I try not to use them UNTIL Skellege ?... I'm a completionist, so I can't help myself. It's likely why I am also at actually finishing games. I'm captain of the "get 90% of the way there and start a new game" team. Witcher 3 is the last game I actually completed, I think, which let's you know how good the story is.I'd wager 40 hours or so, especially if you're talking about the stupid underwater ones. Also when you do more treasure hunts you...get more treasure which means more time buying/selling/reequipping.
Whoever put sunken treasure guarded by drowners you can't do **** to needs to be given a wedgie and hung on a coathook by said underwear.