Windsor Spitfires 2021 Offseason Thread (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

OHLTG

Registered User
Nov 18, 2008
16,537
8,547
behind lens, Ontario
What has impressed me the most are how much the players have grown since the pandemic started. Cuylle, Birkett, Ride, De Angelis, and Abraham, to name a few.
 

windsor7

Registered User
Nov 29, 2015
9,960
2,996
What has impressed me the most are how much the players have grown since the pandemic started. Cuylle, Birkett, Ride, De Angelis, and Abraham, to name a few.

Lets hope for no awkwardness in skating with the growth spurts.
 

EON

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 31, 2013
8,043
1,688
Raleigh, NC
Hey guys good for you. If I may make a suggestion, ding the guys that seem to constantly instigate as well. There’s a few who seem to think it’s funny. Then a few of us, yes I’m guilty, get their backs up and call them out. Thanks!

I probably should be staying out of this since in 12 years I only had a couple posts removed when everyone did during the rumoured sale until a few weeks ago when I started getting warnings, multiple posts removed all based on responding to the content of the posts as the warning said I should keep my posts to.

Haven't changed anything about my posting and while my posts were deleted the posts I responded to stayed up until I raised a stink about it in the thread.

So people post trying to get a response and if people don't respond the post stays up. If people do respond the response is taken down and the initial post remains up until you publicly raise a stink. Makes it difficult to tell what rules apply to who on here so reporting would bring questionable results.

I don't agree with reporting people, if your big enough to stir things up because someone disagrees with your opinion then you should be big enough to be called out as well as big enough to know to move on when the debate is over.

Apparently not the case with some.

Now I'm sure this will be taken down in 3...2...1... ?

Exactly what HockeyPops said, if you want them to be dealt with, report the posts and move on, responding only makes things worse. I won't speak for nelli but I simply do not have time to read through every single post on this board and the Windsor thread, it's way too much. The OHL board is extremely active and we are the only two assigned moderators (though global mods can investigate when posts get reported). This is a thankless job that we do for free, volunteering available free time to try and keep this board a good place to talk hockey. Report the post and move on, if it breaks the site rules, the post will be removed and the poster will be warned. If the poster gets dinged enough, they can get banned, simple as that.

The Windsor board has a lot of very passionate fans and that's great, but obviously it does attract some troublemakers. I'm glad things are back on topic (for now), that's the last I'll touch on this subject as I don't want to disrupt the hockey talk more.
 

hockeylegend11

Registered User
Sep 11, 2010
15,810
3,836
Lets hope for no awkwardness in skating with the growth spurts.

I have noticed no problems with Abraham,DeAngelis and Cuylle especially Cuylle
As for Ride moves well for a 6'8" guy
Birkett cant make a determination will be monitoring him as we move on.
McDonald despite 6'5" moves better then 1-1/2 years ago,which is a good thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHLTG

windsor7

Registered User
Nov 29, 2015
9,960
2,996
I have noticed no problems with Abraham,DeAngelis and Cuylle especially Cuylle
As for Ride moves well for a 6'8" guy
Birkett cant make a determination will be monitoring him as we move on.
McDonald despite 6'5" moves better then 1-1/2 years ago,which is a good thing.

The awkwardness does happen in a lot of players.
If they r playing well during practice thats good.
I want Windsor to succeed and continue to make progress in winning. Its been awhile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stips

OHLTG

Registered User
Nov 18, 2008
16,537
8,547
behind lens, Ontario
I have noticed no problems with Abraham,DeAngelis and Cuylle especially Cuylle
As for Ride moves well for a 6'8" guy
Birkett cant make a determination will be monitoring him as we move on.
McDonald despite 6'5" moves better then 1-1/2 years ago,which is a good thing.

That was one thing I noticed at camp - McDonald has improved his skating a fair bit. He's quicker, seems to flow better, and had this determination about him. Let's hope it translates to points.
 

hockeylegend11

Registered User
Sep 11, 2010
15,810
3,836
That was one thing I noticed at camp - McDonald has improved his skating a fair bit. He's quicker, seems to flow better, and had this determination about him. Let's hope it translates to points.

Yes and McDonald showed great chemistry with Johnston and Miedema
Miedema moves well for a big kid and Johnston has grown to 6'2" and he is the midget of that line lol.
 

member 71782

Guest
Time for the updated signed player/roster, prospects and draft pick lists.

All signed players HT and WT are taken from the OHL site.

All prospects HT and WT are taken from Elite Prospects so many are likely not up to date. If anyone has the current info please let me know so I can update it. I also kept only the prospects from the last two Priority Selections and U18 Drafts. If there's anyone know to still be on Windsor's protected lists let me know. With these prospects this would leave Windsor a few spaces on their 50 man protected list, not including the U18 prospects which I believe are a separate list.

All draft picks are from my own tracking and are for the next four drafts, as far out as draft picks can be traded. If there's any that are incorrect or someone has information to show the correct picks let me know so I can correct. I have all the trade information dating back to 2015.

Note on the draft picks, Windsor owes one of the three 2023 draft picks it currently holds to Hamilton from the Renwick trade. Once that has been settled they will only have two 2023 3RD RND picks.

ROSTER AND SIGNED PLAYERS

FORWARDS
TEAMYEARROUNDOVNAMEDOBPOSSHTSHTWT
WSR20176TH106THDaniel D'Amico2001-01-25C/LWL5'10"197
PTB20181ST3RDWill Cuylle2002-05-02LWL6'04"210
WSR20181ST10THJean-Luc Foudy2002-05-13CR6'00"190
WSR20182ND25THKyle McDonald2002-02-05RWR6'05"216
OTT20185TH86THMatt Maggio2002-11-25RWR6'00"181
WSR20191ST6THWyatt Johnston2003-05-14CR6'02"181
WSR20192ND41STPasquale Zito2003-06-01CL6'01"176
WSR20209TH174THWylie Birkett2004-03-05LWL6'06"210
WSR20201ST14THRyan Abraham2004-04-05CL5'10"164
WSR2021 IMP1ST51STAvval Baisov2004-04-26LWL5'11.5"187
WSR20211ST4THEthan Miedema2005-03-22LWL6'04"201
WSR20214TH73RDChristopher O'Flaherty2005-03-12LWL6'02"188
WSR2021FA0Oliver Peer2003-03-09RWL6'00"166
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
DEFENCE
TEAMYEARROUNDOVNAMEDOBPOSSHTSHTWT
KIT20171ST13THGrayson Ladd2001-03-01RDR6'02"181
WSR20175TH96THLouka Henault2001-01-31LDL5'11"180
HAM20172ND34THMichael Renwick2002-01-26RDR6'00"187
WSR20183RD45THDylan Robinson2002-05-03LDL6'06"206
WSR20194TH67THJames Jodoin2003-02-04RDR6'02"196
WSR2020 IMP1ST40THDaniil Sobolev2003-03-03RDR6'00"198
WSR20202ND36THNicholas De Angelis2004-05-22LDL6'02"192
WSR20212ND20THBronson Ride2005-01-14RDL6'08"193
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
GOALTENDERS
TEAMYEARROUNDOVNAMEDOBPOSCTCHHTWT
WSR20183RD59THXavier Medina2002-01-20GL6'00"171
WSR2019 U182ND25THMatthew Tovell2002-01-24GL6'03"191
WSR20202ND39THKyle Downey2004-03-04GL6'01"179
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PROSPECTS

FORWARDS AND DEFENCE
TEAMYEARROUNDOVNAMEDOBPOSSHTSHTWT
WSR20204TH77THTrevor McDowell2004-07-31LDL6'02"185
WSR20207TH134THEmmerson Miller2004-01-14LDL6'01"194
WSR20208TH154THTyler Catalano2004-02-26C/RWR6'04"216
WSR202010TH194THKareem Al-Azem2004-01-02RDR6'02"190
WSR202011TH214THLuke Fritz2004-01-06RWR5'10"170
WSR202012TH234THMichael Mesic2004-08-15CL5'08"140
WSR202013TH254THJosh Beiles2004-01-14CR5'11"150
WSR202014TH280THNicholas Vantassell2004-04-28CR6'03"185
WSR202015TH294THNoah Mourneau2004-05-07LWL5'07"134
WSR2020 U181ST14THAlexander Park2003-07-17RDR5'11"150
WSR20214TH76THEthan Martin2005-03-25CL6'04"190
WSR20215TH89THJack Greenwell2005-01-05CR5'11"161
WSR20216TH101STFrancesco Dell'Elce2005-06-23LDL6'00"154
WSR20217TH123RDJacob Crisp2005-01-15LDL5'09"161
WSR20218TH156THGavin McCarthy2005-06-02RDR6'01"170
WSR202111TH203RDTanner Winegard-Bartlett2005-01-11RDR6'05"190
WSR202112TH236THCole MacArthur2005-04-19RDR6'02"203
WSR202113TH243RDKei Hagiwara2005-05-04CL5'08"154
WSR202114TH276THCain Tucker2005-11-26LWL5'07"135
WSR202115TH291STMichael Cesario2005-01-06C5'11"159
WSR202115TH299THMax Frattaroli2005-11-10LWL5'10"185
WSR2021 U182ND24THAlex Campbell2004-02-23CR5'08"145
WSR2021 U183RD48THColin Smith2004-02-17RDR5'10"166
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
GOALTENDERS
TEAMYEARROUNDOVNAMEDOBPOSCTCHHTWT
WSR2020 U182ND34THLuka Dobrich2003-03-13GL5'11"164
WSR20219TH163RDKenneth/Trey Augustine2005-02-23GL6'00"161
WSR202110TH196THJoshua Branton2005-01-14GL6'00"170
WSR2021 U181ST17THTyler Bouck2004-01-12GL6'03"175
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PICKS
YEARRND 1RND 2RND 3RND 4RND 5RND 6RND 7RND 8RND 9RND 10RND 11RND 12RND 13RND 14RND 15
2022> WSR 1ST> OTT 2ND (DiPietro Trade)> WSR 3RD> ERI 4TH (MacDougall Trade)> WSR 5TH> WSR 6TH
> KGN 6TH (Frasca Trade)
> WSR 7TH> WSR 8TH> WSR 9TH> WSR 10TH> WSR 11TH> WSR 12TH> WSR 13TH> WSR 14TH ---
2023> WSR 1ST> OTT 2ND (DiPietro Trade)> HAM 3RD (Staois Trade)
> KIT 3RD (Stanley Trade)
> KNG 3RD (Vilardi Trade)
--- ---> WSR 6TH
> FLT 6TH (Pitre Trade)
> NB 6TH (VIA NIA, Stevens Trade)
> WSR 7TH> WSR 8TH> WSR 9TH> WSR 10TH> WSR 11TH> WSR 12TH> WSR 13TH> WSR 14TH> FLT 15TH (Pitre Trade)
2024> WSR 1ST> KIT 2ND (Stanley Trade)> BAR 3RD (Luchuk Trade)> WSR 4TH> HAM 5TH (Staois Trade)> WSR 6TH> WSR 7TH> WSR 8TH> WSR 9TH> WSR 10TH> WSR 11TH> WSR 12TH> WSR 13TH> WSR 14TH> WSR 15TH
2025> WSR 1ST> KNG 2ND (Valardi Trade)> WSR 3RD> WSR 4TH> WSR 5TH> WSR 6TH> WSR 7TH> WSR 8TH> WSR 9TH> WSR 10TH> WSR 11TH> WSR 12TH> WSR 13TH> WSR 14TH> WSR 15TH
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

member 71782

Guest
Reviewing the above Windsor has a relatively solid roster going into the season. They need a few upgrades to be true contenders and regardless of if this becomes a buy or sell year they likely don't move a lot of talent in or out of the line up.

To add to this roster they have the following picks available

4x 2NDS
4x 3RDS
3x 4THS
3x 5THS
7x 6THS

That's not a lot of draft capital for deals to be a contender.

Lots of young talent and based on the reports from those who saw camp at all lots who could be pushing hard for a roster spot next year which is a good sign.

Windsor will be in tough trying to outbid the likes of Barrie and a couple of other teams in the East for deadline acquisitions as well as a couple of teams in the West who could outbid them as well. While a solid roster Windsor is not a contender with this roster at this point. They'll be good, definitely should be top 4 in the conference but they'll be relying on their youth for contributions to reach that position so any deals that involve any younger players going out open another hole that needs to be filled. The lack of draft picks available for deals is going to hurt as well if they plan to add.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. The one thing they cannot afford to do is stand pat. They have full draft boards starting in 2026 and beyond, 2026 comes into play next season but they have no extra picks left over from past deals before the draft pick trade rules were changed so they will continue to be spin their wheels if they don't add this year and stand pat again. Just looking at Barrie who has around 20 picks to deal away in rounds 2 and 3 alone to make a run on top of probably the deepest roster to start the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: punch1943

GermanSpitfire

EU Video Scout for McKeen’s
Jul 20, 2020
12,315
22,010
www.mckeenshockey.com
Windsor’s most pressing need is a top-2 defender. That being said Windsor has one of the best OA defenders in the OHL in Henault and he may have progressed significantly since the last time he hit the ice for the Spits.

Guys that could be fits are Daniil Chayka, Jack Thompson, Mitchell Smith and Lleyton Moore ; O’Rourke and Sebrango’s rights could be traded too but it’ll be an uphill battle to get them to be sent back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LDN

member 71782

Guest
Windsor’s most pressing need is a top-2 defender. That being said Windsor has one of the best OA defenders in the OHL in Henault and he may have progressed significantly since the last time he hit the ice for the Spits.

Guys that could be fits are Daniil Chayka, Jack Thompson, Mitchell Smith and Lleyton Moore ; O’Rourke and Sebrango’s rights could be traded too but it’ll be an uphill battle to get them to be sent back.

This is an area we will disagree on.

Windsor's D has needed an overhaul for a while now but it still has the same basic core with additions and subtractions every team goes through. I like the additions but the remaining vets (Henault, Ladd and Robinson are questionable. It's a wait and see on how Renwick fits in.

Henault as always, IMO been a product of whoever he's had for a partner to cover for him. Ladd covered for him and he didn't produce a whole lot. Corcoran covered for him as well as gave him some nice offensive opportunities and he produced more. He always been a bit of an adventure when it comes to his defensive play, in the zone and out. As an OA there's plenty that are better out there.

Ladd has always been decent. Good at a lot of things, spent a lot of time covering for Henault but not great at any. Whiloe he is decent defensively he's not very physical. Like Heault, as an OA there's a lot better out there that can fill the role Ladd fills.

Both them being OAs you need more from them and the first couple of months of the season will tell if they've improved enough to be considered in that top tier of OA D. As of now if you're a contender looking to add top OA D to your roster where do Ladd and Henault fall on the list?

Robinson is more off ice issues than anything. If he fixes them he'll be a solid piece going forward this year.

Those you listed will be interesting.

Chayka I don't see being available. Guelph and Windsor I've been comparing for a couple of seasons now and before the draft Guelph was in a better position in terms of roster and draft picks. They're still in a better position with draft picks and if they can come out similar to how many think Windsor will why would they be considering moving Chayka? Both teams have question marks and both could go either way.

Thompson would be a decent addition. Sudbury looks like they'll be a couple of years before they make another push.

Smith I'm not really sold on.

Moore would be a decent add.

O'Rourke I think the Soo would hold onto him. They've become one of those teams that would rather make the playoffs then move a player and with an excess of OAs they'll acquire some draft capitol to support other moves.

Sebrango would be one of the top non OAs to add. Depending on what Detroit does in terms of D in GR he could be back. Not going to et on it but it's a possibility.

A few other D I would consider/prefer

OAs Perrott (OS), Woolley (OS), Xhekaj (KIT) and 02 Jesus (OSH).
 

Teflon

Registered User
Jan 6, 2018
1,857
3,308
Glad someone is finally seeing what I’ve been preaching. This D is suspect at best… me, I’d be on the horn to the Sound, frankly I’d try for both Woolley and Perrott. Of course it might mean moving 1 young, another guy and a pick. Unless all the what if’s are magically better this is where I start. It lets the goalies play more comfortable and frankly it’ll help the offence. Clearing the net, first pass and big shots all contribute and right now it’s lacking.
 

member 71782

Guest
Glad someone is finally seeing what I’ve been preaching. This D is suspect at best… me, I’d be on the horn to the Sound, frankly I’d try for both Woolley and Perrott. Of course it might mean moving 1 young, another guy and a pick. Unless all the what if’s are magically better this is where I start. It lets the goalies play more comfortable and frankly it’ll help the offence. Clearing the net, first pass and big shots all contribute and right now it’s lacking.

Woolley and Perrott replacing Henault and Ladd instantly takes Windsor from top 4 in the conference to favourites in the conference if goaltending holds up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: punch1943

Teflon

Registered User
Jan 6, 2018
1,857
3,308
And what if you could keep 1 of them and trade a young project forward with other pieces?!?!
 

member 71782

Guest
And what if you could keep 1 of them and trade a young project forward with other pieces?!?!

They're definitely in the conversation. Both would bring something Windsor needs with difference being one has a bit more offensive upside and the other is a slightly more physical and defensive force although both bring a strong defensive game that Windsor is missing.

As far as Henault and Ladd, neither is elite and while Henault can add some offence he needs a strong partner to cover for him, he has no defensive game last time we saw him play. Ladd, while not physical is at least responsible on the defensive side of the puck.
 

windsor7

Registered User
Nov 29, 2015
9,960
2,996
They're definitely in the conversation. Both would bring something Windsor needs with difference being one has a bit more offensive upside and the other is a slightly more physical and defensive force although both bring a strong defensive game that Windsor is missing.

As far as Henault and Ladd, neither is elite and while Henault can add some offence he needs a strong partner to cover for him, he has no defensive game last time we saw him play. Ladd, while not physical is at least responsible on the defensive side of the puck.

And ladd accident prone. Doesn't help
 

FiveHoleo

Registered User
Jul 31, 2021
480
666
Glad someone is finally seeing what I’ve been preaching. This D is suspect at best… me, I’d be on the horn to the Sound, frankly I’d try for both Woolley and Perrott. Of course it might mean moving 1 young, another guy and a pick. Unless all the what if’s are magically better this is where I start. It lets the goalies play more comfortable and frankly it’ll help the offence. Clearing the net, first pass and big shots all contribute and right now it’s lacking.
I would wait until they actually played a game before deciding to deal for 2 guys on the blue line. I don't know how anyone could judge this after a single blue and white game being played. Suspect at best is a pretty harsh view to take out of one scrimmage game that meant nothing after 2 years of inactivity. If it's apparent that it's weak after seeing them play some games against other teams I'm all for making deals, but I'd like to actually see them be bad before deciding they are. Much like the old "ownership is cheap and incompetent" meme that dominated this board for 2 years, this take on the defense seems to be based on speculation and bias more than any sort of evidence. It could end up being correct in the future sure, but its impossible to judge that now and doesn't seem likely based on the returning players Windsor has, when compared to other teams. True story!
 

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
930
480
Toronto, ON.
Bowler and Windsor showing class by moving kid along to another team to play in the OHL.

Some say he can step in ahead of Burkett, Flaherty, Martin, Peer, and Greenwell, and must just be a timing thing.

Either way Kudos to Windsor.
Would like to see this sort of thing happen much more often, this is what an agent should be doing for these kids!
 
  • Like
Reactions: member 71782

dirty12

Registered User
Mar 6, 2015
9,205
3,854
My question is - what would either one cost us?

And the 2nd Q is; why would OS move their leadership group for what many here believe are lesser OA D?
My guess to the first question is; more than it’s worth.
 

GermanSpitfire

EU Video Scout for McKeen’s
Jul 20, 2020
12,315
22,010
www.mckeenshockey.com
It wouldn’t surprise me to see De Angelis moved in a package for an upgrade on D.

I also don’t know if anyone has mentioned this but Marc Savard went on a podcast an said Foudy won’t be back he then back tracked and said he doesn’t expect him to be back.
 

member 71782

Guest
My question is - what would either one cost us?

Until any top OAs get moved no one knows what the market is yet. The problem becomes does Barrie set the market, OAs or otherwise? They've got the most assets and a deep roster. They need a goaltender and a few complimentary pieces to solidify themselves as the early season favourites to take the league. If they overpay slightly for a complimentary piece than anyone else thinking of contending will be trying to outbid each other allowing Barrie to still win any bidding wars for a couple of major pieces.

Once we hit mid November we'll have a better idea of who looks to be all in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stips

member 71782

Guest
And the 2nd Q is; why would OS move their leadership group for what many here believe are lesser OA D?
My guess to the first question is; more than it’s worth.

OS still has to move at least one OA, I doubt they'll want to take any back.

In what is likely a year they make the playoffs but not get out of the first round they may want to add some assets, potentially a younger player who fits their time line a bit better. With Barrie heavy on assets and Niagara as well everyone else will likely have to include young players in their offers.

Maybe they stand pat with two of the better OA D in the league and potentially extend their time line a bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dirty12
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad