Cfaub
I don't see anything wrong with a coach's style or systems check Dipietro's comments in today's Star if we win in the end,If a team's scoring is not as good as another you make sure your other areas are better,and they were,, goaltending and team d were #2 in the league,special teams were #4 in PP, and for your info the best in OHl since they have kept record almost 20 years in PK #1 ,at 89 per cent,and player injury and absence to key players was the highest in the league and no doubt had an impact most of the season.
Coach Flynn said Erie and Windsor were the best teams his team saw all season, and once the Spits got to play Erie, Knoblach made a point that this was the 1st time they played a healthy,full Windsor team play all year .In the end we saw what happened Windsor outscored Erie 8-5 in the 2 games,won the special teams in both areas had better goaltending and team defense,better clutch performances,and at the great team coaching not just Thompson but all the coaches.
I have said this before OHL copies NHL,tough to score in NHL because it's coached that way,it seeps down to Jrs,coach to defend,and guess what it works,I prefer more scoring myself,but also appreciate strong defense and goaltending,we got this in this tournament,and more 18 goals for an average of 4.50, regular season it was 3.41,Erie btw outside the 12 goal game averaged 3 and that's including an empty netter, against Windsor 2.50 while Windsor averaged 4, goaltending defense and timely scoring ruled the day.
Maybe this will be clearer.
No issue with good defensive systems etc but they and good offensive systems do not need to be mutually exclusive.
During the season they played not to lose, tried to hang in there and capitalize when they had a safe play.
What happened?
They finished 5th, lost in the first round and went in the tourney simply as the hosts.
During the tourney, they played to win. They forced the issue offensively, played a strong and responsible defensive game.
What happened?
They took on all 3 league champs and won the tourney.
The frustration all season from many is the team didn't play the way they were capable of and playing that style would and did cost them all season. During the tourney they played the way everyone thought they were capable of and had the results most believed they were capable.
Everyone, at least their fans were happy to see them win the cup but many were disappointed with their season. They had a successful tournament but the question for me and probably others will always be how much success could they have had during the season if they had played the same way all year.
We're both happy for their success but obviously disagree on how much success they had.
To me, the regular season in a Memorial Cup year was not a success but winning the tournament was a success.
You liked Rocky as a coach, I think he handled this season poorly but I have given him credit for changing things up in the tournament and doing things different compared to the season.
I think we are all tired of this discussion, it was a polarizing year with mixed results that in the end saw the team achieve their ultimate goal, winning a Memorial Cup while missing a few big ones along the way.
Again, congrats on winning the tourney, they earned it.
Time to move on as I'm sure most would prefer.