Funny part is that it's not even the first time.LOL at Subban just shooting it in at the red line and scores.
Reminds me of that game in Toronto a few years ago when they scored 9. The way some of those went in was bizarre.Holy Cow- we are scoring some weird goals tonight!
Reminds me of that game in Toronto a few years ago when they scored 9. The way some of those went in was bizarre.
It's ONE game. If it becomes 3 or more, then we can question it.so why the **** is he playing with cow turd aberg and jarnkrok? we have a top 10 winger in the WHOLE LEAGUE in his prime and that's his linemates. someone name a top 10 forward at their position playing with such ****ty linemates.
so why the **** is he playing with cow turd aberg and jarnkrok? we have a top 10 winger in the WHOLE LEAGUE in his prime and that's his linemates. someone name a top 10 forward at their position playing with such ****ty linemates.
there's no need for it to be even one. not like any line is getting sheltered. put forsberg with the guys that has worked for going on 2 years. jarnkrok and aberg are what they are. jarnkrok actually has use. dont try to fit a square in a peg hole.It's ONE game. If it becomes 3 or more, then we can question it.
I think the point was to ease Johansen back (they did the same with Bonino when he came back by putting him with McLeod).there's no need for it to be even one. not like any line is getting sheltered. put forsberg with the guys that has worked for going on 2 years. jarnkrok and aberg are what they are. jarnkrok actually has use. dont try to fit a square in a peg hole.
we've missed almost all our great chances. got a lot of lucky bounces. i guess it works out when you are putting pucks to the net.
crosby would be a point per game player with watson. and as your post clearly said, he has had guentzel of late. and also see pens fans clamoring for help on the wing for years. and one goal from aberg and a decent game doesn't hide away the obvious in front of us. forsberg is our best goal scorer. he needs to be with our best guys. we have enough talent with the turris trade. we may be okay against the canucks but long term this won't work.Crosby has almost always been saddled with 3rd line talent at best while some of the better wingers line up with Malkin. It wasn't until Guentzel broke out that he really had actual skill on his line.
also, maybe you missed the last few games where Forsberg - Jarnkrok - Aberg actually scored a bit. I don't think that this is a long-term line, probably doesn't last more than a game or two.
there's no need for it to be even one. not like any line is getting sheltered. put forsberg with the guys that has worked for going on 2 years. jarnkrok and aberg are what they are. jarnkrok actually has use. dont try to fit a square in a peg hole.
we've missed almost all our great chances. got a lot of lucky bounces. i guess it works out when you are putting pucks to the net.
That's the problem with high octane style offense.I like the way we kept our foot on the gas with the lead in that second period. But having said that, we started giving up a few too many good chances as well, partly because of that. I may regret saying this, but I wouldn't mind if we took our foot off the gas JUST A LITTLE and tightened up defensively in the third.....