GDT: Wild @ Sharks - 8 PM CT / 4 AM Finland - FSN+

[StealthClobber]

They should absolutely be assessed a delay of game penalty for challenging after a review. How asinine.

That's actually a good idea. I mean, it's delaying the game by definition of the words so.

 

[HwT]

The right call. Goaltender Jones initiated the (minimal) contact with Nino.

 

[Wild11MN]

It's not delaying the game by definition. The initial review isn't looking for goalie interference, so if it truly was, the only way to get them to overturn it is to challenge it after the first review.

It's dumb, but it's just how it works.

 

[Wabit]

They should absolutely be assessed a delay of game penalty for challenging after a review. How asinine.

I don't mind no delay of game penalty after a goalie interference review. It's called so arbitrarily that the TO loss is fine. I like the delay of game for icing reviews gone wrong, it's cut and dry over the line or not (most of the time).

 

[gphr513]

I'm just becoming so anti-review. Hate what it's doing to sports. The NFL is the biggest culprit, but the NHL is not far behind. It's like you have to wait to cheer until the review is over.

 

[57special]

All this because Foligno was too dumb to gain the center red line before he dumped the puck. Not impressed with this guy at aLl.

 

[57special]

Koivu barely got,it out

 

[melinko]

I am pretty sure Koivu feels he has some points to make, but irritating the official, whether he is right or wrong, isn't good for your team come crunch time.

Shame that refs get mad at players and call games differently (shouldn't be that way), but it is..... kinda like in baseball the catchers know full well not to piss off the umpire if he wants borderline strikes called for his pitchers.

Watching Gopher football this year I noticed that the Gopher players were always physically handing the officials the ball at the end of plays (not even tossing).
This year they had the 2nd fewest penalty yards per game in the entire NCAA, last year (without handing the ball) they were 71st.

Hard not to think it helped them.

 

[57special]

And this penalty because Winnik can't get the puck over the Blue line and gives it away. It's a killer when your bottom six players not only lack skill but also IQ.

 

[gphr513]

Parade to the box is not what we want to be doing up 3

 

[melinko]

Had to be challenging for Staal hitting the goalies foot and not Nino right?

Apparently they were challenging for interference on Nino.

 

[Jesus comma Brodin]

Parade to the box is not what we want to be doing up 3

Thanks, Pierre

 

[gphr513]

The PP looks awesome

 

[gphr513]

Another PP, go get em

 

[Jesus comma Brodin]

Here comes the 4 on 3 PK we always love

 

[Wabit]

Double penalty while on the PP. That's just bad hockey at any level.

 

[HwT]

Good possession and puck movement from the first PP unit this game. No diarrhea wristers into the first enemy player and no miracle cross ice pass attempts from one side to the other.

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

Wow, was that Murphy penalty soft as shit. That's definitely a "3-0 game" penalty.

 

[gphr513]

The classic double penalty lol

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

Koivu was "hooked" worse there than Murphy did.

 

[HwT]

Wow, was that Murphy penalty soft as ****. That's definitely a "3-0 game" penalty.

True, but we got a soft PP from that goaltender interference earlier.

 

[Jesus comma Brodin]

Ef word

 

[gphr513]

Damn, almost got out of that without allowing a goal.

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

True, but we got a soft PP from that goaltender interference earlier.

Yeah, but it's annoying when that penalty is nowhere near what the standard of the game has been. Just called because the score isn't 0-0.

 

[57special]

We can't stand prosperity. The penalties .... I don't understand.