CantHaveTkachev
Legends
like who?What Larsson brings could be replaced by a myriad of top four D in the league. There are only a few Taylor Halls in this league.
cause the Leafs could use one right about now
like who?What Larsson brings could be replaced by a myriad of top four D in the league. There are only a few Taylor Halls in this league.
like who?
cause the Leafs could use one right about now
still didn't answer my question...shockingThe leafs are in the playoffs right now. And they were in the playoffs last year. And they'll likely make it next year.
Don't ask me about the oilers next year.
If that were true, why did we go without that for an entire decade?
still didn't answer my question...shocking
I know it sounds harsh but give your head a shake.I know it sounds harsh but I knew Larsson wasn't as much of a gamer as we would like by the amount of time he took off
the Isles have more firepower than the Leafs and had less win than the Oilers ...despite the gain in talentSorry, I thought you could read between the lines. In other words, the leafs have enough firepower that they don't need a Larsson to make the playoffs. We gave away our second best offensive player and for what? Where are our playoffs?!? Last year? The leafs easily made it this year.
Yes. Because those two trades were basically owner mandated. Give away the asset, don't care if we lose the trade as long as we get money or save money.
Hall/Larsson wasn't like that. It was a 'hockey trade'.
FWIW, he’s a very solid defensive 2D for me. I’m a fan of both players.Do people actually watch Larsson play or do they just look at the goals/assists column?
FWIW, he’s a very solid defensive 2D for me. I’m a fan of both players.
I know it sounds harsh but I knew Larsson wasn't as much of a gamer as we would like by the amount of time he took off
There are people justifying the trade. Hell, there are even people suggesting that Hall was 'dragging down the team' and Chiarelli did right to trade him away. Its kind of why this thread still exists as a flaming pustule on the face of the board.Nobody is justifying the trade. Do you even read the posts?
hard to imagine people that defended this trade would do this trade over again!!!
The fact is that the Devils wouldn't have traded Larsson for Eberle. They weren't interested in trading him unless they had their doors blown off, and Chiarelli decided to do that. That trade doesn't happen for anything less than an overpay by the Oilers, and they'll have to live with that.
Think of it this way. Right now the Oilers have no need or interest in trading Draisaitl. Imagine the kind of offer it would take to make them consider trading Draisaitl. That's what Chiarelli did to a lesser extent to convince the Devils to move Hall. I'm convinced that if he had managed to build a balanced team following that deal, we probably never look back. But the way this year went magnified that deal 10x.
Do people actually watch Larsson play or do they just look at the goals/assists column?
FWIW, he’s a very solid defensive 2D for me. I’m a fan of both players.
Come on now BBO.
This goes beyond how each respective team performs in a given year.
Adam Larsson is never in his life going to have a season even fractionally close to what Taylor Hall did this year or did in 2 seasons in Edmonton.
We're talking about a superstar level player who has now finished top 10 in NHL scoring in 3 of his seasons.
Seriously, you've been saying all year that the only way that you'd trade RNH was if it was for a true #1 d-man otherwise no way. But you're somehow okay with this trade where we traded a substantially better player for a #3?
The Oilers making the playoffs last year took the sting off the trade. It didn't make it a win for us. The only way this trade will be a win is if Larsson establishes himself as a legitimate #1 d-man who can challenge for the Noris.
Otherwise it will never be a win. HK97 can try and bull**** his way through "addition through subtraction" or "change of scenery" or whatever horse ****.
Hall was a superstar here. He's a superstar in New Jersey.
Adam Larsson isn't close.
I watch him play. I see he is fairly slow, very good positionally though. Makes great outlet passes. but then is invisible in the offensive zone. In sum he is a incomplete D man which makes him a 3-4 type. He just needs to do more to be considered a top paring guy.
Do people actually watch Larsson play or do they just look at the goals/assists column?
There are people justifying the trade. Hell, there are even people suggesting that Hall was 'dragging down the team' and Chiarelli did right to trade him away. Its kind of why this thread still exists as a flaming pustule on the face of the board.
The thing is, Adam Larsson was not on the trade block at the time of the trade. The Devils were not openly shopping him. That past season prior to the trade, he evolved into our best defenseman, playing on the top pairing with Andy Greene.Not saying they would've because I have little doubt they offered Eberle. But just because they asked for Hall it doesn't mean they had to give them Hall.
the Isles have more firepower than the Leafs and had less win than the Oilers ...despite the gain in talent
it goes both ways
Do people actually watch Larsson play or do they just look at the goals/assists column?
Sorry, I thought you could read between the lines. In other words, the leafs have enough firepower that they don't need a Larsson to make the playoffs. We gave away our second best offensive player and for what? Where are our playoffs?!? Last year? The leafs easily made it this year.