I like Pyatt’s hustle, speed, and defensive abilities. Offensively he lacks skills. I agree he is a very good 4th liner and PKer. The problem is he is playing on the third line. The team lacks offensive skilled players and the coaching system impedes the offence, particularly for the skilled offensive players. I have noticed in recent games that the players are doing more forechecking in the O zone, so Boucher may be changing his D-first 1-2-2 system which restricts play to 2/3 of the ice surface.
I think this is a myth because like you said, the system impedes the offence. Let's take a look at the staff they started the season with :
(The 1st pace is last year under Boucher and the 2nd pace is the the 2 years
prior playing for Boucher)
Turris : 58 pts per 82 games (64 pts per 82 games*)
Stone : 62 pts per 82 games (66 pts per 82 games)
Hoffman : 68 pts per 82 games (56 pts per 82 games)
Ryan : 33 pts per 82 games** (57 pts per 82 games)
Brassard : 39 pts per 82 games (60 pts per 82 games)
MacArthur : injured (53 pts per 82 games***)
Pageau : 33 pts per 82 games (39 pts per 82 games)
Smith : 35 pts per 82 games (36 pts per 82 games****)
Dzingel : 32 pts per 82 games (small sample size)
Burrows : 34 pts per 82 games***** (30 pts per 82 games)
Pyatt : 23 pts per 82 games (playing in Europe)
Thompson : injured (18 pts per 82 games******)
Notes : * Turris : only 1 year because he was vastly affected by an injury in 2015-16
** Ryan : injured plagued season
*** MacArthur : I took 2013-14 & 2014-15 because of injuries
**** Smith : only 1 year because he was mostly injured in 2014-15
***** Burrows : 20 games with Ottawa, 55 games with Vancouver
****** Thompson : only 1 year because he was injured in 2015-16. He was also mostly injured in 2016-17
Based on their recent past, this should have been a very potent attack. Look at what could have been expected based on their 3 years prior this season
Hoffman (~60-70) - Turris (~55-65) - Stone (~60-70)
MacArthur (~40-50) - Brassard (~50-60) - Ryan (~45-55)
Smith (~30-35) - Pageau (~30-35) - Dzingel (~30-35)
Burrows (~25-30) - Thompson (~15-20) - Pyatt (~20-25)
Then they replaced Turris by Duchene who is even better. Stone and Hoffman, the 2 years prior Boucher were playing their 2 first full years in the NHL so it's normal that their game continue growing, same for Dzingel.
I think injuries and coaching is what affected this team the most and prevented them from playing at their full potential.
It's overlooked because Nick Shore's value is marginal so it's not really worth considering when weighing the trade.
Well, considering that Phaneuf and Gaborik are both overpaid vets on their last few years in the NHL, they didn't really have much more value than Shore...
It was basically an overpaid #4 D-man veteran for an overpaid #3rd line RW veteran.
Ottawa retained because Gaborik was way less expensive (in $) and wanted to save money. And because a #4 D-man is the more useful position, to sweeten the pot, the Kings gave up Nick Shore (RFA) and took Thompson contract (33 y/o, 1 year at 1.6 owed then UFA)