DowntownBooster
Registered User
Exactly, the only reason the Coyotes choose to 'honour' Hawerchuk is because they're a mickey mouse franchise and need gimmicks to pull more then 5000 people.
I think the Coyotes have been in Arizona long enough that they have no need to "honor" players that played in Winnipeg. They have been there since 1996-97 which is now a longer period of time than the Jets 1.0 were in the NHL. It would be safe to assume that most Coyotes fans in Arizona could care less about what transpired with the team before it arrived there as is the case of most fans of sports teams that arrive by relocation.
I think a lot of people don't understand that once a team leaves a market, the players that played there (and did not follow the team upon relocation) will not have an affinity with the franchise afterwards. It's the fans that they have an affinity with not the franchise. Hawerchuk never played in Arizona, therefore, he would have no true feelings about being in the Coyotes Ring of Honour. He went to Arizona for the ceremony simply because he is a gentleman but his heart wasn't in it. That's not a knock against Arizona but simply the truth. It meant so much more to him when TNSE raised a banner in BellMTS Place with his name and number in recognition for his years with the Winnipeg Jets. He is emotionally connected to Winnipeg and its fans because this was home to him while he plied his trade with the Jets. He is also now involved with the Winnipeg Jets alumni.
The great Baltimore Colts quarterback Johnny Unitas refused to be involved with any attempts by the franchise to raise a banner for him when the team relocated to Indianapolis. He was emphatic in his refusal by stating that he played for the fans of Baltimore not Indianapolis. It may be different for players that move with a franchise upon relocation but for those who didn't it makes more sense to do what Unitas did. As such, the names of Hull and Hawerchuk should have been left behind in Winnipeg where they played for the fans.