thewave
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2011
- 40,269
- 10,157
Line Combos: Where should Marner play?
- Thread starter SHANNYPLAN
- Start date
supermann_98
Registered User
Laser is not the first word that comes to mind when I think of Marner’s shot.
It reminds me more of when you throw a balloon
It reminds me more of when you throw a balloon
nonikhanna
Registered User
What about Kapanen-Kadri-Marner? That would be an exciting line to watch. Skill, Speed. Marner gets 2 finishers with excellent defense.
The other lines can remain intact somewhat.
Hyman-Matthews-Nylander
JVR-Marleau-Brown
Martin/Lievo-Bozak-Komarov
ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 73,801
- 39,317
Mess
Global Moderator
That is essentially how one would surround Marner with players to bring out the best in him. A big power forward and a good 2-way Centre that plays in traffic.
ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 73,801
- 39,317
Leafs fail scoring has dropped hard the past half a dozen games outside of the Matthews and Kadri/Marleau lines. Babcock shuffling the lines is definitely in order and sticking Marner with Kadri and Marleau seems like it could work well in theory (both Marleau and Kadri could play centre and both are goal scores whereas Marner is a pass first winger). I think it is definitely worth a shot, see if they have chemistry. Frankly, given the Leafs current funk the only line that should be untouchable is the Matthews line which has been unstoppable this season.
Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 78,723
- 53,265
I think the intent would be to have Marner on a separate functional unit. Like how Toews and Kanes each do their own thing.
ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 73,801
- 39,317
Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 78,723
- 53,265
If we had a player like Nick Ritchie, I'd be okay with a Nylander, Marner, Ritchie line.
Not to get into a Brian Burke mentality, but when you go on a California road trip and you play these Western Conference beasts, you quickly realize some of the limitations of carrying half a dozen guys who are around 6'0" or under: Bozak, Kadri, Komarov, Brown, Hyman, Kapanen who are meant to be your all around utility types on various lines to support the super skilled Marner and Nylander types.
At this point we need skill and size. And more elite skill too.
Not to get into a Brian Burke mentality, but when you go on a California road trip and you play these Western Conference beasts, you quickly realize some of the limitations of carrying half a dozen guys who are around 6'0" or under: Bozak, Kadri, Komarov, Brown, Hyman, Kapanen who are meant to be your all around utility types on various lines to support the super skilled Marner and Nylander types.
At this point we need skill and size. And more elite skill too.
If Hyman is indeed there to stay with Matthews for a few years, maybe Korshkov would be a good LW on Marner's line?
DarkKnight
Professional Amateur
- Jan 17, 2017
- 32,162
- 49,500
Egghead1999
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2007
- 3,157
- 853
that is a joke
Actually, I believe the oppositions clog up the passing lanes and let him shoot; give no respect.
Last edited:
Marner should be a center. He doesn't have the shooting to play a scoring winger. He doesn't have the body or build to be a board warrior.
What he has is crazy playmaking prowess and a slowly eroding two-way game.
Get the man in center and stop the bleeding before he's too far gone to save.
What he has is crazy playmaking prowess and a slowly eroding two-way game.
Get the man in center and stop the bleeding before he's too far gone to save.
Grunny crossed my mind too, but I thought of Yegor based on size. Good call though regardless.
Next year:
Hyman - Matthews - Marner
Marleau - Nylander - Brown
Grundstrom - Kadri - Kapanen
Martin - Gauthier - Komarov
Hyman - Matthews - Marner
Marleau - Nylander - Brown
Grundstrom - Kadri - Kapanen
Martin - Gauthier - Komarov
Pookie
Wear a mask
- Oct 23, 2013
- 16,172
- 6,684
This is the downside of increased expectations on winning.
The kid is 20. Some of the comments here are significantly unfair.
The kid is 20. Some of the comments here are significantly unfair.
ShaneFalco
Registered User
I think they honestly have to move a body or two out so there can be more options for lines, and balancing two-way play.
Mitch will be fine though, no doubt about it. But if you're going to demote him to the 4th line, there are a few other players who could use a kick in the arse. Komarov being one
Mitch will be fine though, no doubt about it. But if you're going to demote him to the 4th line, there are a few other players who could use a kick in the arse. Komarov being one
Sure seemed like a hell of a shot to me. People keep trashing his shot like it was Rielly's when he came into the league. He doesn't have the power that Matthews does, but judging by that clip, it seems he's been working on it.
Mess
Global Moderator
I think you should reward good play and effort and Willie shouldn't be demoted to try and fix other issues. IMO
ULF_55
Moderator
Definitely.
He isn't McDavid or Matthews,.
Only 14 games into his 2nd. season, and hardly the time to panic over a challenging start.
ULF_55
Moderator
Well, maybe if the goal was to get Marner comfortable that might make sense.
My guess Babcock is more concerned with getting the team comfortably playing their best.
Pookie
Wear a mask
- Oct 23, 2013
- 16,172
- 6,684
Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
The downside to having guys come into the NHL sooner is you usually still have to deal with development ups and downs while under more intense scrutiny.
Kid just needs time to find his game, his issue at the moment is clearly mental rather than physical, he didn't suddenly forget to play hockey like he did the season prior.
Kid just needs time to find his game, his issue at the moment is clearly mental rather than physical, he didn't suddenly forget to play hockey like he did the season prior.
