kb
Registered User
- Aug 28, 2009
- 15,282
- 21,714
Took a team that was a serious contender last year and made it into a non playoff team this year. How in anyway is that good management, or good asset management? They may have been better off with nothing. But we will never know. The only thing we know is that they torpedoed their team 2 seasons in a row in the name of asset management. The Blues are a shining example of what every team that worries about asset management (like certain fans do) over winning will look like.So?
Are the Blues better off with nobody? Or with Brayden Schenn in his prime moving forward? They knew they were losing their man, and so they flipped him and eventually addressed a position of weakness.
Sorry- but if you don't view that as good asset management, then there's not much discussion to be had.
Both Mirtle and Friedman suggested Liljegren or Dermott needed to be in any potential McDonagh package - that's why the Leafs backed out. Tampa could make that deal because they have a stockpile of assets after some smart asset management over the past 4 years.