Shady Machine
Registered User
- Aug 6, 2010
- 36,704
- 8,141
Why isn't he good for a 3rd line? We have wanted more talent in our bottom 6 for years.
I guess he doesn't grind enough *****es down.
Why isn't he good for a 3rd line? We have wanted more talent in our bottom 6 for years.
but the roster is unquestionably better
I don't know. I mean even if you make the most nonsensical line choices, there are still too many skilled forwards to have them be bad. You have the following guys that could be top 6 players, at least in a pinch, and actually produce:
Sid, Geno, Kessel, Hornqvist, Perron, Plots, Bennett, Bonino, Kunitz, Dupuis, Fehr.
Let's say these are the lines:
Kunitz-Crosby-Kessel
Plots-Malkin-Hornqvist
Bonino-Fehr-Dupuis
Wilson-Sundqvist-Perron
Bennett
That's obviously not the way any of us would write up the lines, but they still look like a pretty big upgrade from the past few years. This forward roster is pretty close to idiot proof.
Why isn't he good for a 3rd line? We have wanted more talent in our bottom 6 for years.
"I'm not sure the Pens are better this year than last year"
- general boards, proving once again that people should have to pass an iq test to log on
It feels really good to be so hated again.
It feels really good to be so hated again.
Murray had a really, really good season, but it's still a small sample size. Plus, with that type of performance, he has shown NHL starter upside. Why risk stunting his development by having him ride pine for 60 games next year?
Assuming we re-sign Perron and one of Plotnikov or Bonino become a top 6 wing, I just don't see room for Bennett. He's not really ideal for a 3rd line. I'm not saying trade him immediately.. but eventually.
was there a time when the Pens weren't blindly hated on this board?
This is blatantly false. This is the old regime thinking that the 3rd line is reserved solely for defense.
You need to get past that. JR wants 4 lines that can score. That means BB is ideal for ANY line.
Cooke-Staal-Kennedy is dead. Move on. Sutter is gone. The shut down 3rd line theory needs to be gone too.
We also need to stop worrying about 3rd line vs 4t line. At this point, with our depth, who cares? Our 4th line isn't Glass-Adams-XXXX anymore where putting him there for 10min/game could hurt him. No, we have VERY capable players on all lines. If anything, we have a 3A and 3B bottom 6 now that can be mixed and matched.
Perron-Sid-Horny
Plots-Malkin-Kessel
Bennett-Fehr-Dupuis
Kunitz-Bonino-Sundqvist
is what I'm envisioning once everyone is healthy and assuming that the roster stays as is.
I'd like to see..
Kunitz-Sid-Kessel
Perron-Malkin-Hornqvist
Plotz-Fehr-Bennett
Bonino-Sundqvist-Dupuis
I know, I know...there are factors to this working...If Kunitz can come back from his dreadful season, this would give a nice balance of sand paper and scoring...if horny can gel with Geno...if Perron can score...
I'd like to see..
Kunitz-Sid-Kessel
Perron-Malkin-Hornqvist
Plotz-Fehr-Bennett
Bonino-Sundqvist-Dupuis
I know, I know...there are factors to this working...If Kunitz can come back from his dreadful season, this would give a nice balance of sand paper and scoring...if horny can gel with Geno...if Perron can score...
In order for Bennett to be ideal for any scoring line he needs to start.... Scoring.