Value of: Wayne Simmonds or Boone Jenner to the Leafs

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
Sponsor
May 8, 2011
37,651
74,725
Philadelphia, Pa
o
Look what you made me do.


I Mean, yours doesnt even make sense(provorov wasnt a top 5 , Marner isnt even close to the value of Provorov, while it could easily be argued that Simmonds > JVR, and theres literally no argument to be made that Provorov is struggling, whil you could argue Marner is - but i wouldnt) but yeah, sure.
 

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
Simmonds is more than a rental, but yeah, point taken.

It's be at least Kapanen and 1st as the ask from our end.
Does Simmonds exclusively play RW?

If it was Kapanen and a 1st, I think that could actually be of interest if if freed JVR up for trade. I think we'd be looking at a 1st+a prospect that's not quite as good as Kapanen but close in return and I'd live with that if it gave an extra year before we had to make a decision on keeping a UFA winger. RW is a little crowded for us with Marner/Nylander/Brown though
 

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
Sponsor
May 8, 2011
37,651
74,725
Philadelphia, Pa
Does Simmonds exclusively play RW?

If it was Kapanen and a 1st, I think that could actually be of interest if if freed JVR up for trade. I think we'd be looking at a 1st+a prospect that's not quite as good as Kapanen but close in return and I'd live with that if it gave an extra year before we had to make a decision on keeping a UFA winger. RW is a little crowded for us with Marner/Nylander/Brown though

Yeah, Simmonds doesnt do well on his off-wing, or at least didnt when we tried to make Simmonds - G - Voracek a thing, anyway.
 

Diamond Joe Quimby

A$AP Joffrey
Aug 14, 2010
13,547
2,996
Washington, DC
o


I Mean, yours doesnt even make sense(provorov wasnt a top 5 , Marner isnt even close to the value of Provorov, while it could easily be argued that Simmonds > JVR, and theres literally no argument to be made that Provorov is struggling, whil you could argue Marner is - but i wouldnt) but yeah, sure.

Neither makes a lick of sense. That's the point.
 

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
Yeah, Simmonds doesnt do well on his off-wing, or at least didnt when we tried to make Simmonds - G - Voracek a thing, anyway.
guess that makes sense, he uses his body to protect the puck so well, he'd want his stick to the boards side

If we got Nylander signed (want his comps to be wingers, not centers) then we moved him to center and it worked, I'd be on board with Kapanen+1st. Then we deal JVR for a similar-ish return to restock what we lost, and let Leivo have a real look in JVR's spot

Nylander's eligible to be re-signed whenever at this point, I think he was holding out to see if he could have a big season and get moved to center but maybe he'd be flexible because he's not playing center at all. We'd have to do it before the TDL so JVR could be moved out
 
Last edited:

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
Sponsor
May 8, 2011
37,651
74,725
Philadelphia, Pa
guess that makes sense, he uses his body to protect the puck so well, he'd want his stick to the boards side

If we got Nylander signed (want his comps to be wingers, not centers) then we moved him to center and it worked, I'd be on board with Kapanen+1st. Then we deal JVR for a similar-ish return to restock what we lost, and let Leivo have a real look in JVR's spot

Yes, thats a big reason why him on LW wasnt as effective.

Sounds like it could work from your end, might be a deal worth exploring this off-season when Bozak is gone and Nylander (presumably) is forced to shift over?

Which side is Kapanen playing more of for the marlies these days? If memory serves, he was bouncing from wing to wing, curious if they've settled on a side or not?
 

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
Yes, thats a big reason why him on LW wasnt as effective.

Sounds like it could work from your end, might be a deal worth exploring this off-season when Bozak is gone and Nylander (presumably) is forced to shift over?

Which side is Kapanen playing more of for the marlies these days? If memory serves, he was bouncing from wing to wing, curious if they've settled on a side or not?

Marleau has been filling in as a center too, and said that he doesn't mind staying there to the media which could just be him toeing the company line

Kapanen's still playing both sides, more RW now but he does have the right skillset to play his off wing - fast, shifty, good quick release. I like him on LW better but I think he'll always have the ability to play either
 

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
Sponsor
May 8, 2011
37,651
74,725
Philadelphia, Pa
Marleau has been filling in as a center too, and said that he doesn't mind staying there to the media which could just be him toeing the company line

Kapanen's still playing both sides, more RW now but he does have the right skillset to play his off wing - fast, shifty, good quick release. I like him on LW better but I think he'll always have the ability to play either


Got it. I dont know leafs lines, but i assume they'd look something like this if you made the trade?

Hyman - Matthews - Marner
Marleau - Nylander - Simmonds
XXX - Kadri - Brown


Does that look about right? I assume someone like Bracco or as you mentioned, Leivo would fill in that 3LW spot? Brown and Simmonds could probably slide up/down accordingly, as well. Having Marleau with Nylander in theory would allow for growing pains of Nylander at C, and while Simmonds certainly isnt a Selke candidate, hes decent defensively as well.

Good to hear on Kap. Having someone with flexibility would be huge for us as it allows us to throw a few different looks. Given Giroux at LW and the likely emergence of Linblom next year, the top 6 for LW is relatively locked - but Lindblom has played both in the past as well. There's also Konecny who has played both, too.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
53,853
31,394
40N 83W (approx)
I can't think of any reasonable scenario that ends with Jenner on the Leafs while omitting Kadri - he'd be our target. It just seems like a poor trade match.
 

lifelonghockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 18, 2015
6,283
1,356
Lake Huron
There is no logic for the Leafs to give up assets for wingers. Maybe a defencemen. Leafs are good at RW, so trading one (Marner) for another (Simmons) is kinda a lateral move. Even this year, there stats are almost identical.
Jenner is nice, but doubt if replaces Hyman, JVR or Marleau at LW, so what's the point?
 

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
Got it. I dont know leafs lines, but i assume they'd look something like this if you made the trade?

Hyman - Matthews - Marner
Marleau - Nylander - Simmonds
XXX - Kadri - Brown


Does that look about right? I assume someone like Bracco or as you mentioned, Leivo would fill in that 3LW spot? Brown and Simmonds could probably slide up/down accordingly, as well. Having Marleau with Nylander in theory would allow for growing pains of Nylander at C, and while Simmonds certainly isnt a Selke candidate, hes decent defensively as well.

Good to hear on Kap. Having someone with flexibility would be huge for us as it allows us to throw a few different looks. Given Giroux at LW and the likely emergence of Linblom next year, the top 6 for LW is relatively locked - but Lindblom has played both in the past as well. There's also Konecny who has played both, too.

Ya that's pretty much it in the long term, Komarov is still on the team for now as well so he's attached to Kadri until that changes

Bracco is probably still 2 years away, but Leivo/Soshnikov are on the NHL roster and Andreas Johnsson looks like he's ready for a try whenever he's called upon, so there's options. Marleau can move to the Kadri line and Nylander's line could be sheltered too so we have some roster flexibility

even if something on this scale was unlikely and you guys needed RW prospects, there's probably a prospect-for-prospect deal to be made for a Bracco/Johnsson that could make sense too that could give you a chance to replace Simmonds minutes out of the system. We could use more center depth on the farm if you had any comparable prospects to those guys that are up for trade
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
I am guessing Jackets want our 1st+ or Liljegren is mentioned. Our wingers are fine. Defense needs fixing. Other teams would likely outbid us.

if the leafs moved liljegren for boone jenner there would be riots
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
I am 100 percent serious.

I think Simmonds for Marner is a legitimate offer Philly should be seeking and value isn't insanely off. Remember, we got Top 5 picks in Schenn and Voracek (plus more) for Richie and Carter. Sure there's arguments to be made about their contracts being longer and being better (maybe), but that's why it's a 1-1 swap I'm proposing.

Marner seems to be the one struggling of the top 3 or 4 big guns in TO...Simmonds could really help them. Gotta give to get -- this may be the price to "get" a Wayne Simmonds.

uhmmm yeah it is. Simmonds is basically a more physical JVR (30g or so/50-60pts). He is gonna get paid huge after next season. you don't trade a kid with 61pts in 77 games for someone 9 years older and soon to get 2x his salary in UFA.

this is basically the equivalent of the leafs asking for Patrick for JVR
 

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
Sponsor
May 8, 2011
37,651
74,725
Philadelphia, Pa
Ya that's pretty much it in the long term, Komarov is still on the team for now as well so he's attached to Kadri until that changes

Bracco is probably still 2 years away, but Leivo/Soshnikov are on the NHL roster and Andreas Johnsson looks like he's ready for a try whenever he's called upon, so there's options. Marleau can move to the Kadri line and Nylander's line could be sheltered too so we have some roster flexibility

even if something on this scale was unlikely and you guys needed RW prospects, there's probably a prospect-for-prospect deal to be made for a Bracco/Johnsson that could make sense too that could give you a chance to replace Simmonds minutes out of the system. We could use more center depth on the farm if you had any comparable prospects to those guys that are up for trade
Ya that's pretty much it in the long term, Komarov is still on the team for now as well so he's attached to Kadri until that changes

Bracco is probably still 2 years away, but Leivo/Soshnikov are on the NHL roster and Andreas Johnsson looks like he's ready for a try whenever he's called upon, so there's options. Marleau can move to the Kadri line and Nylander's line could be sheltered too so we have some roster flexibility

even if something on this scale was unlikely and you guys needed RW prospects, there's probably a prospect-for-prospect deal to be made for a Bracco/Johnsson that could make sense too that could give you a chance to replace Simmonds minutes out of the system. We could use more center depth on the farm if you had any comparable prospects to those guys that are up for trade

We've got some decent C pieces that project as mid or bottom 6C, but really only Frost and Rubstov for a top 6 kind of role. I wouldn' feel comfortable moving them until Patrick asserts himself a little more though.
 

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
11,782
16,606
switch kapanen for brown

Lmao please tell me you're kidding.

I love Simmonds' game, but let's be realistic here. A PP specialist (50% of his goals on the PP, around 40% of his total points) winger who has a 60 point ceiling is not going to return a top-4 D on an identical contract, let alone adding a 1st + 20 goal scorer PK specialist with upside.

Just for fun, Gardiner had 30 points at even strength last year, Simmonds had 27.
 
Last edited:

Philadelphia Ducks

Win it for Ed
May 8, 2011
7,401
1,064
Ontario, Canada
Lmao please tell me you're kidding.

I love Simmonds' game, but let's be realistic here. A PP specialist (50% of his goals on the PP, around 40% of his total points) winger who has a 60 point ceiling is not going to return a top-4 D on an identical contract, let alone adding a 1st + 20 goal scorer PK specialist with upside.

Just for fun, Gardiner had 30 points at even strength last year, Simmonds had 27.

PP goals count for the same amount as EV goals on the scoreboard.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
o


I Mean, yours doesnt even make sense(provorov wasnt a top 5 , Marner isnt even close to the value of Provorov, while it could easily be argued that Simmonds > JVR, and theres literally no argument to be made that Provorov is struggling, whil you could argue Marner is - but i wouldnt) but yeah, sure.


so this is what chia did to the percevied value of dmen....sigh

leafs are more than happy with marner. they chose him over hanifin,werenski and provorov.

I think werenski is the only guy they would move magic mitch for
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
PP goals count for the same amount as EV goals on the scoreboard.

Simmonds would have been 7th among leafs forwards in scoring last year. safe to say they arent giving up prime assets for him. offense and wing in particular arent a problem
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Toulouse vs Montpellier
    Toulouse vs Montpellier
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $246.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Hoffenheim vs RB Leipzig
    Hoffenheim vs RB Leipzig
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $8,351.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Torino vs Bologna
    Torino vs Bologna
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $810.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luton Town vs Everton
    Luton Town vs Everton
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $1,010.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Getafe vs Athletic Bilbao
    Getafe vs Athletic Bilbao
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $10.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad