Confirmed Signing with Link: [VAN] F Elias Pettersson signs extension with Canucks (8 years, $11.6M AAV)

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,501
7,931
Absolutely ecstatic about this. My favourite player, signed long-term, below market value.
Gives me, and many Canucks fans, the kind of joy you hope to get from following sports.

Those who don't understand cap percentage and that the cap is going up are only calling this 'fair' or 'not great'.

But this deal will look hilariously favourable within a couple of years in a completely undeniable way.

It's already amazing, but it will soon be undeniable even to nature's D students.
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
14,704
20,365
Nylander was also a UFA vs Petey being an RFA
1 season of RFA remaining vs. all UFA years played a role here, too.
In practical terms, there is zero difference. EP was as good as a UFA, because if he had taken Vancouver to arbitration, that's a 1 year deal with a NMC. Vancouver couldn't have moved him. So in practice, they had to get a deal/trade done before the arbitration deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bh53

Chairman Maouth

Retired Staff
Apr 29, 2009
26,212
13,010
Comox Valley
There are a lot of posts I like in this thread, but rather than liking them all individually I thought I'd comment instead.

I argue a lot around here. Sometimes it gets a little heated and I admit I sometimes come across pretty strong. Because of this and because of the way the Canucks fan base clashes with a couple other fan bses, it can leave a person thinking opposing fans are jerks — at least some of them.

This thread is kind of changing my mind about that. The overwhelming congratulations in this thread from fans of other teams seem 100% genuine and frankly, that touches my heart a little. Thanks, y'all. Maybe you can teach an old dog a new trick every now and then.
 

KevinRedkey

12/18/23 and beyond!
Jan 22, 2010
9,932
4,872
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dirtydanglez

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
4,845
4,759
The contract has a lot of bonus money every year, except 2026-27 where it's 100% salary.

Anyone have any idea why that may be?

the cba ends after the 25-26 season but not sure why he wouldn't want bonuses that year. unless it was the teams decision so they dont have to pay out if there is a work stoppage.

miller's contract has the same thing. hughes didn't get any bonuses.
 

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,343
2,333
Now it's time to lock up Lindholm for 8 years too at 9.5M. :D
1709484647565.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: DekeyPete

Frankie Blueberries

Allergic to draft picks
Jan 27, 2016
9,293
10,835
Everywhere? The NHL used to have best of 3 preliminary rounds in the 1970s and those all count & no one questions that. 2020 was pretty much the same thing except it was a one-time only expanded format.
Well if the play-in round counts as a playoff round, then what were the teams “playing in” for?
 

conFABulator

Registered User
Apr 11, 2021
820
764
In practical terms, there is zero difference. EP was as good as a UFA, because if he had taken Vancouver to arbitration, that's a 1 year deal with a NMC. Vancouver couldn't have moved him. So in practice, they had to get a deal/trade done before the arbitration deadline.
I am not sure I agree with that. A player having the leverage of saying "I am going to shop my services to 31 other teams" is not the same as one year of arbitration and NMC.

I like the signing and the amount, but I think Vancouver was able to get him a bit lower because they weren't buying 8 years of UFA, only seven.
 

KevinRedkey

12/18/23 and beyond!
Jan 22, 2010
9,932
4,872
the cba ends after the 25-26 season but not sure why he wouldn't want bonuses that year. unless it was the teams decision so they dont have to pay out if there is a work stoppage.

miller's contract has the same thing. hughes didn't get any bonuses.

Ahh okay that makes sense. Thank you
 

Brookbank

Registered User
Nov 15, 2022
1,777
1,707
It's a fair deal. But there's a lot of Canucks fans who seem to think players getting this money never have bad stretches. Petterson will have his slumps. And a large part of the fanbase will grind him through it and dwell on the money. At some point in the next few years, they will even bump this thread and say "everyone thought this was a good deal, har har".

But on balance , though his strengths and weaknesses , this was the deal we needed.
 

KCC

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
18,600
9,693
It's a fair deal. But there's a lot of Canucks fans who seem to think players getting this money never have bad stretches. Petterson will have his slumps. And a large part of the fanbase will grind him through it and dwell on the money. At some point in the next few years, they will even bump this thread and say "everyone thought this was a good deal, har har".

But on balance , though his strengths and weaknesses , this was the deal we needed.
Unless you are Mcdavid. His bad stretches are still a point per game. Lol
 

McVespa99

Registered User
May 13, 2007
5,991
2,753
Seems reasonable. Dont see it as a "steal" by any means but it doesnt feel like a big overpay either.
 

Luck 6

\\_______
Oct 17, 2008
10,253
1,895
Vancouver
Seems reasonable. Dont see it as a "steal" by any means but it doesnt feel like a big overpay either.

Why I think its kind of a “steal” is because it eats up his entire prime, but ends at age 33, so it doesn’t have any risky years at the back end of the contract.

Guys like Nylander, Pastrnak, Huberdeau, etc who signed similar contracts are all older, and as such, there is a lot more risk overall. Usually that would cost more, but in this case, it didn’t.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,566
9,967
Why I think its kind of a “steal” is because it eats up his entire prime, but ends at age 33, so it doesn’t have any risky years at the back end of the contract.

Guys like Nylander, Pastrnak, Huberdeau, etc who signed similar contracts are all older, and as such, there is a lot more risk overall. Usually that would cost more, but in this case, it didn’t.
Always a pro and con with doing bridge or term out of elc.

Pro with bridge is that you ge the player only for their prime which would typically be around 33. But you pay the higher cap hits for their years 7-11 vs doing max term.

Pro with max term if both sides can agree is that you get a good cap number for the years you hope to contend. But when that deals ends at 29/30 have to decide if it makes sense to still continue. Or be prepared to have 3/4 down years once the player passes age 33/34.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad