Rufus
Letangarang
- May 27, 2014
- 1,929
- 18
No, NO, NO rentals. You don't win with rentals . This is hockey history 101.
LA and Gaborik? Chicago and Vermette? Plenty of teams have won with rentals
No, NO, NO rentals. You don't win with rentals . This is hockey history 101.
I have zero issue moving Pouliot, but it won't be for a ****ing rental.
Page 5 of this thread delivered.
Why do people even mention TIOPS
I vote Mr Wilson for GM and IcedCapp as AssGM
Good luck with that! Pooh AND a 1st??? Youd get neither.No worries I didn't take it as rude, I just wanted to get a feel of Pens assets since the media is reporting that they are heavily In on a player.
As great as Hamhuis is I don't think he will fetch Dustin Byfuglien kind of return.
Comparable would be Sekera last year at trade deadline and Hamhuis is 10x better than Sekera who was also an upcoming UFA. LA gave up 1st rnd pick and Roland Macewon.
Pouliot
2017 1st rnd pick
Should get it done for Hamhuis.
Not sure if you would like the price tho but if a bidding war for Hamhuis happens then all likelihood that will be the cost.
Dmen are always the most coveted at trade deadline.
This is the same GM that gave sutter 4.25 million. Not too worried about giving up anything important. Benning is dumb as rocks.
One never knows if the evil nine wants to triumph the Despres trade.
They could trade Dumoulin + Bennett or something ******** for him.
But dumo is just as good as ham. And cheaper and is a RFA in a year. If we give up dumo for ham, im done. Baxk to back years of throwing away a young top4 dman will kill me.
Only if Jiggy is our head scout.
Okay look, i think you need to get a firm grasp on something that, despite your protestations to the contrary, I don't think you get:
this is not the front office of the Pittsburgh Penguins Ice Hockey Team.
We couldn't tell you if the GM will be fired for a variety of different outcomes. We can't tell you his level of interest in player A or player B.
We can't agree to a trade that makes your team 150% better today than it was yesterday.
You want a chat:
THE PENS ARE INTERESTED IN DAN HAMHUIS, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO OFFER?
A) nothing, because it's not mine to offer
B) Probably nothing your team wants, because the Pens have no fungible assets to spare, especially for what will almost assuredly be a rental.
This is the most perfect argument for not having a Trade and Free agent section to HF boards. You could apply this to all 30 teams and their fans with just this.
So you want our top prospect AND a 1st for a guy who likely has no interest in re-signing here.
Seems like a smart move on our part.
Yeah, that is just awful.
Canucks board seem to be satisfied w:
Dumoulin
2- 2nd rnd picks.