Compare that renovated Nassau Coliseum Hockey Lockers to these new lockers and room for the University of Texas Football team. By the way each locker cost $8,700 a piece.
http://ww1.hdnux.com/photos/63/77/71/13631072/3/1024x1024.jpg
but if a player accepts a free pack of gum they lose their scholarship and are banned from college sports for life....
So if NYCFC does put in a bid, is could considered a serious challenge to the Isles plan?
Both would have strong backing and with local ties with the Yankees owning 20% of the MLS team.
Does which sports come into play over which one would be more favoured.
On one hand, there are 2 15-20K seat indoor arenas (not looking at New Jersey) and another 13K building not far away. The region doesn't have a modern soccer venue on the NY side of the Stateline. Would that play a role?
On the other hand, a new arena for the Islanders brings 41+ dates a year plus whatever concerts and minor league sports they can bring in. A soccer stadium would have far less use but if there are many that oppose the re-development, does less mean more?
Given that NYCFC's entire existence seems to be based on being able to claim they are within the 5 boroughs, I'm not sure how well they'd manage moving to Belmont, especially given that their fan base is made up in large part by people who were never willing to take the PATH out to Harrison before.
In all honesty, I don't know anyone who considers Belmont part of Nassau.Perhaps addition of the following could make it difficult for the Isles https://esd.ny.gov/sites/default/files/rfp/Belmont_Addendum1.pdf
Addendum #1
Release Date: August 16, 2017
1) The Selection Criteria on Page 15 has been revised to include the following criteria in “Overall
Projectâ€:
Overall economic benefits of the Project, including but not limited to local jobs and local
economic impacts that supports community revitalization and sustainability.
https://esd.ny.gov/sites/default/files/rfp/Belmont RFP.pdf
Overall Project • Extent to which proposed Project strengthens Belmont as a premier
destination for entertainment, sports, recreation, retail and
hospitality on Long Island
30%
To me the addition of overall economic benefits of the project clause where sustainability is involved among other things no longer guarantees the project that generates the most $$$ to win, as the overall economic benefits clause seems pretty broad that may include nuisance to the community
Or get Nassau County and NYC to redraw the border so that half of lot B goes to NYC/Queens, while Nassau gets all of the property north of B including the Belmont LIRR, since that rearrangement would make NYCFC part of NYC, even though the other half of the stadium (this could also apply to the Isles) is in Nassau.
Actually the Red Bull Arena is located on a subway line. The PATH Train is a rapid transit line just like the NYC subways and not a commuter train line like NJ Transit, the LIRR or Metro-North.It's kind of irrelevant whether or not the border is redrawn, New York City FC exists solely because people whined for years about how awful it was that there weren't MLS teams located three minutes from their house in Queens and Brooklyn.
Their existence is heavily predicated on being in the city, and not just in a token manner. If they aren't on actual subway lines they will be no different than the Red Bulls
actually, it won't be Baltimore... the Wizards already have a G-League team, Cacciaguida, @ the new SE Washington Practice facility---it just has yet to be named, owned by Monumental..
Could work by Citi Field as the baseball stadium is there and there is land to build an arena. I guess Belmont if you could the horse track. Otherwise, no. Unless, you count the Meadowlands, too.Here in Ottawa we have Lansdowne Park which has TD Place Stadium and TD Place Arena right beside each other.
Could something like that be worked out for New York? If any city in North America could host all these arenas it's New York.
Baltimore doesn't have to affiliate with Washington. In fact if they want their own identity I would avoid it.
I'm watching all these NBA teams putting their minor league franchises in the same markets as their pro teams and I'm doubting the longevity of their plans.
Nobody is all that interested in making Belmont a reality. A bid would have to be made very, very soon, and City Football Group is unlikely to submit one at all.
Patricof thinks that the edge of the edge of the edge of Queens is too far away for a permanent home.
President of NYCFC says they are not likely to submit a bid for the Belmont site.
https://www.hudsonriverblue.com/2017/8/31/16226360/nycfc-stadium-news-patricof-queens-bronx-belmont
this is what pizzes me off the most about modern day sports....it's 2017 and some teams are STILL playing in old dumps or temporary accommodations like the Isles. a whole lot of politicking from various level of governments and NIMBY's that can delay getting new arenas built, to the point where the NFL's Chargers and Raiders and Rams all have/will have new homes and the Isles having to abandon a dump arena for a basketball arena that seems to no longer want them there. and don't even get me started on the Arizona Coyotes!!
Bingo. Even Belmont won't be better because as long as the franchise exists in Barclays, it's in the black.I disagree that leaving Barclays would be best for the Islanders, unless another Arena is built in a suitable location. For the health of the franchise, the most viable option right now is fixing the pipes in Barclays. Moving back to Nassau Coliseum is the absolute worst option, regardless of the ice in Brooklyn.
Bingo. Even Belmont won't be better because as long as the franchise exists in Barclays, it's in the black.